Suppr超能文献

急性肾衰竭的鉴别诊断。

Differential diagnosis of acute renal failure.

作者信息

Espinel C H, Gregory A W

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 1980 Feb;13(2):73-7.

PMID:7363517
Abstract

This prospective study compares the fractional excretion of sodium, FENa, urinary sodium concentration, UNa, urine osmolality, Uosm, and the U/P creatinine ratio in their diagnostic effectiveness in 87 patients with acute renal failure: 22 acute tubular necrosis, 18 non-oliguric acute tubular necrosis, 12 acute urinary tract obstruction, 14 acute glomerulonephritis, and 21 pre-renal azotemia. Discriminant analysis demonstrated a correct diagnostic classification in 86 of 87 patients using FENa, and only 46, 60 and 65 correct using Uosm, UNa, and U/P Cr, respectively. FENa is identified as the most effective non-invasive test for the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. An FENa of 1 classifies all entities into two groups: FENa more than 1; acute tubular necrosis, non-oliguric acute tubular necrosis and urinary tract obstruction and less than 1; pre-renal azotemia and acute glomerulonephritis (P less than 0.001).

摘要

这项前瞻性研究比较了钠排泄分数(FENa)、尿钠浓度(UNa)、尿渗透压(Uosm)以及尿/血肌酐比值在87例急性肾衰竭患者中的诊断效能,这些患者包括:22例急性肾小管坏死、18例非少尿型急性肾小管坏死、12例急性尿路梗阻、14例急性肾小球肾炎以及21例肾前性氮质血症。判别分析显示,使用FENa时87例患者中有86例诊断分类正确,而使用Uosm、UNa和尿/血肌酐比值时,正确诊断的分别只有46例、60例和65例。FENa被认为是急性肾衰竭鉴别诊断中最有效的非侵入性检查。FENa为1可将所有病例分为两组:FENa大于1的,包括急性肾小管坏死、非少尿型急性肾小管坏死和尿路梗阻;FENa小于1的,包括肾前性氮质血症和急性肾小球肾炎(P<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验