Olakotan Olufisayo, Lim Jennifer N W, Pillay Thillagavathie
Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Directorate, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07056-z.
In clinical settings, digital dashboards display medical data, with the aim of identifying trends and signals. In so doing these contribute towards improving service delivery and care within hospitals. It is not clear whether the utility of perinatal health equity dashboards could be used to identify health inequality trends that could potentially impact on health service delivery, care and public health interventions. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of health inequality dashboards that address disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes, with a specific focus on identifying key challenges encountered during their deployment and use in healthcare settings.
Three databases, namely Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were searched to identify relevant studies in English Language published between 2010 and 2022. All findings were reported according to PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews.
Of 670 identified articles, only 13 met the inclusion criteria. The study identified three key themes: dashboard functionality, data accuracy, and challenges in collecting health inequality data. Dashboards were used to visualize disparities, with functionalities focusing on specific audiences, contents, and utility. Issues with data completeness, standardization, and challenges in collecting consistent health inequality data, especially from diverse ethnic groups, hindered the accurate tracking of maternal and neonatal disparities.
The use of perinatal health inequality dashboards is a critical step forward in optimizing maternal and neonatal care by providing targeted interventions. However, further research is needed to assess their long-term impact on reducing health inequalities, while addressing challenges related to data accuracy, completeness, and standardization to improve their effectiveness.
在临床环境中,数字仪表盘展示医疗数据,旨在识别趋势和信号。这样做有助于改善医院的服务提供和护理。围产期健康公平仪表盘的效用是否可用于识别可能影响医疗服务提供、护理和公共卫生干预措施的健康不平等趋势尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估解决孕产妇和新生儿结局差异的健康不平等仪表盘的实施情况,特别关注确定在医疗环境中部署和使用这些仪表盘时遇到的关键挑战。
检索了三个数据库,即Embase、CINAHL和Medline,以识别2010年至2022年期间发表的英文相关研究。所有研究结果均按照PRISMA范围综述指南进行报告。
在670篇已识别的文章中,只有13篇符合纳入标准。该研究确定了三个关键主题:仪表盘功能、数据准确性以及收集健康不平等数据方面的挑战。仪表盘用于可视化差异,其功能侧重于特定受众、内容和效用。数据完整性、标准化问题以及收集一致的健康不平等数据(尤其是来自不同种族群体的数据)方面的挑战阻碍了对孕产妇和新生儿差异的准确跟踪。
使用围产期健康不平等仪表盘是通过提供有针对性的干预措施优化孕产妇和新生儿护理的关键一步。然而,需要进一步研究来评估它们对减少健康不平等的长期影响,同时应对与数据准确性、完整性和标准化相关的挑战,以提高其有效性。