• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子患者报告结局指标(ePAQ-MPH)评估妇科长期候诊患者的潜在危害。

Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology.

作者信息

Gray Thomas, Johnson Sandra, Prosser-Snelling Edward, Simpson Paul

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0
PMID:39707325
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662428/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient waits for gynaecology appointments increased by 60% in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to use the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Menstrual, Pain and Hormonal (ePAQ-MPH) electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) to assess symptoms, impact and potential harm for patients waiting > 60 weeks for general gynaecology appointments at a teaching hospital.

METHODS

1070 patients waiting > 60 weeks for a new appointment (range 60-72 weeks) were invited to complete ePAQ-MPH online to measure gynaecological symptoms and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Patients could also call to cancel appointments no longer needed. Non-responders were telephoned weekly for three further weeks and asked to complete ePAQ-MPH. Patients scoring > 80/100 for ePAQ-MPH domains relating to HRQoL had their appointment escalated to be seen within six-eight weeks. Thematic content analysis was undertaken of free-text concerns recorded using ePAQ-MPH.

RESULTS

526 patients completed ePAQ-MPH (49.2%), 169 of these scored greater than 80/100 for one or more HRQoL domains and were seen within 6-8 weeks. 103 patients (9.6%) requested to cancel their appointment. Reasons included problem resolving spontaneously (33%), problem treated by general practitioner (10%) and being seen by a private provider (28%). Commonly recorded free-text concerns related to wanting a diagnosis (n = 142), management of condition (n = 98) and pain management (n = 77).

CONCLUSIONS

ePAQ-MPH may be used effectively to prioritise patients waiting for an outpatient appointment in gynaecology. Wider use of ePROMs to support waiting list validation within the NHS and elsewhere should be considered.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中妇科门诊预约的等待时间增加了60%。本研究的目的是使用电子个人评估问卷-月经、疼痛和激素(ePAQ-MPH)这一电子患者报告结局指标(ePROM),来评估在一家教学医院等待普通妇科门诊预约超过60周的患者的症状、影响及潜在危害。

方法

邀请1070名等待新预约超过60周(范围为60 - 72周)的患者在线完成ePAQ-MPH,以测量妇科症状和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。患者也可以致电取消不再需要的预约。对于无回应者,在接下来的三周内每周进行电话随访,并要求他们完成ePAQ-MPH。在与HRQoL相关的ePAQ-MPH领域得分超过80/100的患者,其预约被提前至6 - 8周内就诊。对使用ePAQ-MPH记录的自由文本关注点进行了主题内容分析。

结果

526名患者完成了ePAQ-MPH(49.2%),其中169名患者在一个或多个HRQoL领域得分超过80/100,并在6 - 8周内就诊。103名患者(9.6%)要求取消预约。原因包括问题自行解决(33%)、由全科医生治疗(10%)以及由私立医疗机构诊治(28%)。常见的自由文本关注点包括想要确诊(n = 142)、病情管理(n = 98)和疼痛管理(n = 77)。

结论

ePAQ-MPH可有效用于对等待妇科门诊预约的患者进行优先排序。应考虑在NHS及其他地方更广泛地使用ePROM来支持候诊名单的确认。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bdc/11662428/1efb9d276ed0/12905_2024_3506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bdc/11662428/d69c70c4b627/12905_2024_3506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bdc/11662428/1efb9d276ed0/12905_2024_3506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bdc/11662428/d69c70c4b627/12905_2024_3506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bdc/11662428/1efb9d276ed0/12905_2024_3506_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using an electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePAQ-MPH) to assess potential harm for long-waiting patients in gynaecology.使用电子患者报告结局指标(ePAQ-MPH)评估妇科长期候诊患者的潜在危害。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03506-0.
2
Development and initial validation of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire for menstrual, pelvic pain and gynaecological hormonal disorders (ePAQ-MPH).开发并初步验证了一种用于月经、盆腔疼痛和妇科激素紊乱的电子个人评估问卷(ePAQ-MPH)。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jul;238:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
What are the concerns and goals of women attending a urogynaecology clinic? Content analysis of free-text data from an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire (ePAQ-PF).前往泌尿妇科诊所就诊的女性有哪些担忧和目标?对电子盆底评估问卷(ePAQ-PF)中的自由文本数据进行内容分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan;30(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3697-0. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
4
Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.在择期骨科环境中电子采集患者报告和临床医生报告的结局指标:一项回顾性队列分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 20;6(6):e011975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011975.
5
Retrospective review of history vs. ePAQ-PF in complex urogynaecology patients.回顾性研究历史与 ePAQ-PF 在复杂泌尿妇科患者中的应用。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Sep;276:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
A prospective observational study of the impact of an electronic questionnaire (ePAQ-PO) on the duration of nurse-led pre-operative assessment and patient satisfaction.一项电子问卷(ePAQ-PO)对护士主导的术前评估时间和患者满意度影响的前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 19;13(10):e0205439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205439. eCollection 2018.
7
Italian electronic personal assessment questionnaire-pelvic floor (I.ePAQ-PF): Psychometric validation of the urinary section.意大利电子个人评估问卷-盆底(I.ePAQ-PF):尿液部分的心理测量学验证
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2192-2197. doi: 10.1002/nau.24472. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Electronic personal assessment questionnaire for vascular conditions (ePAQ-VAS): development and validity.电子个人血管状况评估问卷 (ePAQ-VAS):制定与有效性。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jul;107(8):1004-1012. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11531. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Development and Psychometric Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Vulval Disorders (ePAQ-Vulva).外阴疾病电子患者报告结局工具(ePAQ-Vulva)的开发与心理测量测试
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Oct;21(4):319-326. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000345.
10
Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative): Development and validation.患者完成的、术前基于网络的麻醉评估问卷(电子个人评估问卷术前):开发和验证。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):221-228. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000545.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症患者报告的结局指标
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 30;10(21):5106. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215106.
2
A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine.用于尿妇科和女性盆底医学的英文患者报告结局测量的系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2033-2092. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04810-1. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Patient experience of telephone consultations in gynaecology: a service evaluation.患者在妇科电话咨询中的体验:服务评估。
BJOG. 2021 Nov;128(12):1958-1965. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16771. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Prioritisation of outpatient appointments and elective surgery in gynaecology.妇科门诊预约和择期手术的优先级排序。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jun;73:2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Implications for the future of Obstetrics and Gynaecology following the COVID-19 pandemic: a commentary.2019年冠状病毒病大流行后对妇产科未来的影响:一篇评论
BJOG. 2020 Oct;127(11):1318-1323. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16431. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
"Women and children last"-effects of the covid-19 pandemic on reproductive, perinatal, and paediatric health.“妇女和儿童优先”——新冠疫情对生殖、围产期及儿科健康的影响
BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m2287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2287.
7
Development and initial validation of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire for menstrual, pelvic pain and gynaecological hormonal disorders (ePAQ-MPH).开发并初步验证了一种用于月经、盆腔疼痛和妇科激素紊乱的电子个人评估问卷(ePAQ-MPH)。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jul;238:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Evaluation of coital incontinence by electronic questionnaire: prevalence, associations and outcomes in women attending a urogynaecology clinic.通过电子问卷评估性交性尿失禁:在一家泌尿妇科诊所就诊的女性中的患病率、相关性及结局
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jul;29(7):969-978. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3380-x. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Increasing Discussion Rates of Incontinence in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.提高初级保健中尿失禁的讨论率:一项随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Nov;24(11):940-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5230.