Falahchai Mehran, Neshandar Asli Hamid, Faghani Morteza, Hendi Amirreza
Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Department of Dental Prosthesis, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1520. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05348-6.
Achieving a stable bond with zirconia requires mechanical and chemical bonding methods. Information regarding the optimal treatment method for zirconia with varying yttrium content is scarce. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of zirconia with various yttria contents.
A total of 168 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were classified into 12 groups based on the surface treatment method, including airborne-particle abrasion (APA), selective infiltration etching (SIE), hot etching (HE), and control group with no treatment; and yttria contents including Zolid Zi (4.5-5.6 wt% yttrium), Zolid HT White (6.7-7.2 wt% yttrium), and Ceramill Zolid FX (9.15-9.55 wt% yttrium). The surface roughness (Ra and Rz) of the specimens and the shear bond strength was measured (α = 0.05).
The results indicated that the mean bond strength of all specimens was higher after different surface treatments compared to the control group, of which the APA method resulted in higher bonding strength in all kinds of zirconia than other methods (P < 0.05). In all types of zirconia, a significant difference was observed in surface roughness (Ra and Rz) resulting from various surface treatment methods (P < 0.001). Interaction of surface treatment methods and zirconia type significantly affected shear bond strength and surface roughness (P < 0.05).
APA significantly enhanced shear bond strength and surface roughness across all zirconia types and yttria contents. The SIE and HE methods also showed promising results. Zolid Zi showed superior bond strength, whereas Zolid FX demonstrated reduced bond strength.
实现与氧化锆的稳定结合需要机械和化学结合方法。关于不同钇含量氧化锆的最佳处理方法的信息很少。本研究评估了不同表面处理对不同氧化钇含量氧化锆剪切粘结强度的影响。
总共168个圆盘形氧化锆标本根据表面处理方法分为12组,包括空气颗粒研磨(APA)、选择性渗透蚀刻(SIE)、热蚀刻(HE),以及未处理的对照组;氧化钇含量包括Zolid Zi(钇含量为4.5 - 5.6 wt%)、Zolid HT White(钇含量为6.7 - 7.2 wt%)和Ceramill Zolid FX(钇含量为9.15 - 9.55 wt%)。测量标本的表面粗糙度(Ra和Rz)以及剪切粘结强度(α = 0.05)。
结果表明,与对照组相比,所有标本在不同表面处理后的平均粘结强度更高,其中APA方法在各种氧化锆中产生的粘结强度高于其他方法(P < 0.05)。在所有类型的氧化锆中,观察到不同表面处理方法导致的表面粗糙度(Ra和Rz)存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。表面处理方法和氧化锆类型的相互作用显著影响剪切粘结强度和表面粗糙度(P < 0.05)。
APA显著提高了所有氧化锆类型和氧化钇含量的剪切粘结强度和表面粗糙度。SIE和HE方法也显示出有希望的结果。Zolid Zi显示出优异的粘结强度,而Ceramill Zolid FX显示出降低的粘结强度。