• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解阿片类物质使用障碍患者治疗的经济障碍:一项焦点小组研究。

Understanding the financial barriers to treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder: a focus group study.

作者信息

Anyanwu Precious, Olateju Olajumoke A, Tata Vaishnavi, Varisco Tyler, Gilbert Lauren R, Ogunsanya Motolani E, Essien E James, Johnson Michael L, Thornton J Douglas

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Health 2 Building, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.

Prescription Drug Misuse and Education Research (PREMIER) Center, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Health 2 Building, 4349 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77204-5047, USA.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2024 Dec 20;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01133-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01133-4
PMID:39707438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11660775/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the established effectiveness and relatively widespread availability of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder, individuals seeking treatment frequently encounter various structural and social barriers, including costs of treatment. This study aimed to understand the financial barriers that affect treatment continuation in individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

In this qualitative study, seven semi-structured in-depth focus group interviews were conducted among 28 participants in treatment for OUD. Basic demographic information were collected in a pre-focus group survey. Focus group interviews were conducted from December 2021 to February 2022. A moderator guide was used to facilitate the discussion. Transcripts were managed using ATLAS.ti© v7. Data collected from the focus groups underwent deductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Data saturation was reached in 7 focus groups with a total of 28 participants (17 [60.7%] women; 27 [96.4%] white; 24 [85.7%] non-Hispanic). All three medications for OUD were represented (18 [64.3%] buprenorphine and naloxone, 5 [17.9%] methadone, 3 [10.7%] naltrexone, and 2 [7.1%] buprenorphine) and the time in treatment ranged from 1 month to over 36 months. Nearly all participants (27 [96.4%]) indicated a financial barrier that led to delayed treatment initiation and treatment retention. Two themes were identified from the focus group interviews: (1) OUD treatment-related financial burden- the direct and indirect cost associated with the treatment, and (2) psychosocial effects associated with the cost of OUD treatment -the mental, emotional, and social effects of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Most participants described the desire and need for resources to offset the unaffordable cost that inhibits treatment initiation and retention. Further work is required to help identify individuals susceptible to financial barriers that can lead to early discontinuation in treatment.

摘要

引言

尽管用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的药物已证实有效且相对广泛可得,但寻求治疗的个体经常遇到各种结构和社会障碍,包括治疗费用。本研究旨在了解影响阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)患者治疗持续的经济障碍。

方法

在这项定性研究中,对28名接受OUD治疗的参与者进行了7次半结构化深度焦点小组访谈。在焦点小组访谈前的调查中收集了基本人口统计学信息。焦点小组访谈于2021年12月至2022年2月进行。使用主持人指南来促进讨论。访谈记录使用ATLAS.ti© v7进行管理。从焦点小组收集的数据进行了演绎主题分析。

结果

7个焦点小组共28名参与者(17名[60.7%]女性;27名[96.4%]白人;24名[85.7%]非西班牙裔)达到了数据饱和。所有三种用于OUD的药物均有代表(18名[64.3%]使用丁丙诺啡和纳洛酮,5名[17.9%]使用美沙酮,3名[10.7%]使用纳曲酮,2名[7.1%]使用丁丙诺啡),治疗时间从1个月到超过36个月不等。几乎所有参与者(27名[96.4%])表示存在经济障碍,导致治疗开始延迟和治疗中断。从焦点小组访谈中确定了两个主题:(1)与OUD治疗相关的经济负担——与治疗相关的直接和间接成本,以及(2)与OUD治疗费用相关的心理社会影响——该疾病的心理、情感和社会影响。

结论

大多数参与者表示希望并需要资源来抵消抑制治疗开始和持续的难以承受的费用。需要进一步开展工作,以帮助识别易受导致治疗早期中断的经济障碍影响的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e3/11660775/36583102cf17/12954_2024_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e3/11660775/36583102cf17/12954_2024_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e3/11660775/36583102cf17/12954_2024_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the financial barriers to treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder: a focus group study.了解阿片类物质使用障碍患者治疗的经济障碍:一项焦点小组研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Dec 20;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01133-4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder.阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的成本效益。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):767-777. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0247.
3
A mixed-method comparison of physician-reported beliefs about and barriers to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder.一种混合方法比较了医生对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的信念和障碍的报告。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Sep 14;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00312-3.
4
Overcoming barriers to traditional care delivery and pharmacy challenges: a qualitative study of buprenorphine, telehealth, and a digital therapeutic for opioid use disorder.克服传统护理服务的障碍和药房面临的挑战:丁丙诺啡、远程医疗及一种用于阿片类物质使用障碍的数字疗法的定性研究
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Feb 18;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00631-9.
5
Evaluation of medications used for opioid use disorder in emergency departments: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.评估急诊科用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物:2020 年国家医院门诊医疗调查的横断面分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Payment-related barriers to medications for opioid use disorder: A critical review of the literature and real-world application.支付相关的阿片类药物使用障碍治疗障碍:文献综述及真实世界应用的批判性评价。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Oct;165:209441. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209441. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.患者在初级保健中使用治疗阿片类药物使用障碍药物的障碍和促进因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(14):2409-2419. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1653324. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Assessing perceptions about medications for opioid use disorder and Naloxone on Twitter.评估关于阿片类药物使用障碍和纳洛酮药物在 Twitter 上的认知。
J Addict Dis. 2021 Jan-Mar;39(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1811456. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone Compared With Methadone Maintenance and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Dependence.与美沙酮维持治疗和丁丙诺啡维持治疗相比,注射用长效纳曲酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的成本效益分析
Subst Abus. 2015;36(2):226-31. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1010031. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
10
Healthcare utilization and costs associated with treatment for opioid dependence.与阿片类药物依赖治疗相关的医疗保健利用情况和费用。
J Med Econ. 2018 Apr;21(4):406-415. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1427101. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs.考察北卡罗来纳州免费纳洛酮获取方面的地理差异:一项纳洛酮分发项目的横断面调查。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70069.
2
Social Safety Net Programs: The Relationship With Drug Treatment Among Women.社会安全网项目:女性与药物治疗的关系
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun 14;69(3):107948. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107948.
3
Delving into the Elements Impacting Treatment Acceptance among patients with Substance Use Disorder using Health Belief Model: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
After the MATE Act: Integrating Buprenorphine Prescribing Into Mainstream Family Medicine Education and Practice.《药物成瘾治疗法案》之后:将丁丙诺啡处方纳入主流家庭医学教育与实践
Fam Med. 2024 Feb;56(2):74-75. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.877215. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
Use of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among US Adolescents and Adults With Need for Opioid Treatment, 2019.2019 年美国需要阿片类药物治疗的青少年和成年人中,阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3821.
3
Comparing inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand health service implementation problems: a case study of childhood vaccination barriers.
运用健康信念模型探究影响物质使用障碍患者治疗接受度的因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 28;13(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02469-7.
比较归纳和演绎分析技术以理解卫生服务实施问题:儿童疫苗接种障碍的案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Sep 15;2(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00202-0.
4
Switching pharmacies leads to gaps in medication possession in individuals treated with buprenorphine.切换药房会导致接受丁丙诺啡治疗的个体在药物持有率方面出现差距。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Sep-Oct;61(5):589-595. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
5
Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians.阿片类物质使用障碍的药物治疗:一项针对基层医疗医生的全国性调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):160-162. doi: 10.7326/M19-3975. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Differences in Availability and Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Residential Treatment Settings in the United States.美国住宅治疗环境中阿片类药物使用障碍药物的可及性和使用差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20843.
7
Medicaid expansion and treatment for opioid use disorders in Oregon: an interrupted time-series analysis.俄勒冈州医疗补助扩张与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗:一项中断时间序列分析。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Aug 15;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0160-6.
8
Receipt of Timely Addiction Treatment and Association of Early Medication Treatment With Retention in Care Among Youths With Opioid Use Disorder.及时接受成瘾治疗与早期药物治疗对阿片类药物使用障碍青年患者治疗保留率的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1029-1037. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2143.
9
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
State-Targeted Funding and Technical Assistance to Increase Access to Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.针对目标的资金投入和技术援助,以增加阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的可及性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Apr 1;69(4):448-455. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700196. Epub 2017 Dec 15.