Suppr超能文献

考察北卡罗来纳州免费纳洛酮获取方面的地理差异:一项纳洛酮分发项目的横断面调查。

Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs.

作者信息

Marley Grace, Shubel Caroline, Thorpe Carolyn T, Annis Izabela E, Delamater Paul, Carpenter Delesha, Ostrach Bayla

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70069.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to comprehensively identify the programs that distribute naloxone at no-cost in North Carolina, identify where and to whom these programs distribute naloxone, and evaluate disparities in reported naloxone distribution by geographic area.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was delivered to potential no-cost naloxone distributors in NC identified by a community advisory panel. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were utilized to identify disparities in naloxone access by population served (people who use drugs, people who inject drugs) and location of naloxone distribution (rural; urban/suburban).

RESULTS

Approximately 76.5% (241/315) of respondents representing 341 different programs reported that their program(s) distributed no-cost naloxone to community members. Programs represented included health departments (n = 81), treatment programs/centers (n = 59), and syringe service programs(SSPs) (n = 41), among others. Programs reported distributing naloxone most frequently to people who use drugs (94.2%) and people with a substance use disorder history (94.3%). No-cost naloxone distribution was reported less frequently to all patient populations in rural ZIP codes when compared to urban ZIP codes, including justice-involved populations (86.4% vs. 98.3%) and individuals leaving treatment or detox (87.9% vs. 98.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that although most areas in NC were served by at least one no-cost naloxone program, distribution to rural populations may be limited, indicating a need for increased public investment in no-cost naloxone distribution to populations at greatest risk of overdose.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是全面识别北卡罗来纳州免费分发纳洛酮的项目,确定这些项目在何处以及向谁分发纳洛酮,并评估按地理区域报告的纳洛酮分发差异。

方法

向社区咨询小组确定的北卡罗来纳州潜在免费纳洛酮分发商进行了一项横断面在线调查。使用描述性统计和费舍尔精确检验来确定按服务人群(吸毒者、注射吸毒者)和纳洛酮分发地点(农村;城市/郊区)的纳洛酮获取差异。

结果

代表341个不同项目的约76.5%(241/315)的受访者报告称,他们的项目向社区成员免费分发纳洛酮。所代表的项目包括卫生部门(n = 81)、治疗项目/中心(n = 59)和注射器服务项目(SSP)(n = 41)等。项目报告称,最常向吸毒者(94.2%)和有物质使用障碍病史的人(94.3%)分发纳洛酮。与城市邮政编码地区相比,农村邮政编码地区向所有患者群体免费分发纳洛酮的频率较低,包括涉及司法的人群(86.4%对98.3%)和离开治疗或戒毒机构的个人(87.9%对98.6%)。

结论

本研究表明,尽管北卡罗来纳州的大多数地区至少有一个免费纳洛酮项目提供服务,但向农村人口的分发可能有限,这表明需要增加对免费纳洛酮分发的公共投资,以惠及过量用药风险最高的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78b/12320204/ff11d64dd829/JRH-41-0-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验