Suppr超能文献

基于冠状动脉斑块的糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者不良心血管事件终点的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of adverse cardiovascular event endpoints between patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes based on coronary artery plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ma Yuchen, Gao Huiying, Wu Huiqun

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Dec 20;19(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03157-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The classification of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) endpoints in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and either confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) or high CAD risk, as well as the extent of the association between T2DM and coronary plaque characteristics, remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to compare MACE endpoints between patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes based on coronary artery plaques.

METHODS

We searched studies from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up until September 1, 2023. Two independent researchers evaluated the quality and bias of the included studies. We used odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the effect of individual lesion parameters and coronary artery plaque characteristics on MACE endpoints.

RESULTS

Seven studies covered 1218 patients with diabetes and 3038 patients without diabetes. The follow-up time ranged from 2 to 5.4 years. The pooled results indicated that in all CAD lesions, DM was more strongly associated with MACE, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and rehospitalization for unstable or progressive angina. The pooled OR was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.42 to 2.33, I = 0%, P < 0.00001) for MACE, 2.36 (95% CI: 1.47 to 3.79, I = 0%, P = 0.0004) for MI, 1.83 (95% CI: 1.33 to 2.53, I = 0%, P = 0.0002) for revascularization, and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.27, I = 0%, P = 0.002) for rehospitalization respectively. Subgroup analysis of culprit lesions (CLs) revealed significant differences between DM and non-DM for MACE, MI, revascularization, and stent thrombosis. While non-culprit lesions (NCLs) showed differences for MACE, MI, revascularization, and rehospitalization between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The rates of MACE, MI, and revascularization are greater in DM than in non-DM patients in terms of all lesions, CLs, and NCLs. Except for CLs, the readmission rate is greater for unstable or progressive angina. Plaque characteristics are similar between patients with and without diabetes. Prospero registration number CRD42023474226.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中主要不良心血管事件(MACE)终点的分类,以及确诊冠心病(CAD)或CAD高风险患者的情况,还有T2DM与冠状动脉斑块特征之间的关联程度仍不确定。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在比较基于冠状动脉斑块的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间的MACE终点。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年9月1日来自Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的研究。两名独立研究人员评估了纳入研究的质量和偏倚。我们使用比值比(OR)和标准化均数差(SMD)以及95%置信区间(CI)来评估个体病变参数和冠状动脉斑块特征对MACE终点的影响。

结果

七项研究涵盖了1218例糖尿病患者和3038例非糖尿病患者。随访时间为2至5.4年。汇总结果表明,在所有CAD病变中,糖尿病与MACE、心肌梗死(MI)、血运重建以及因不稳定或进行性心绞痛再次住院的关联更强。MACE的汇总OR为1.82(95%CI:1.42至2.33,I=0%,P<0.00001),MI为2.36(95%CI:1.47至3.79,I=0%,P=0.0004),血运重建为1.83(95%CI:1.33至2.53,I=0%,P=0.0002),再次住院为1.65(95%CI:1.20至2.27,I=0%),P=0.002)。罪犯病变(CL)的亚组分析显示,糖尿病组和非糖尿病组在MACE、MI、血运重建和支架血栓形成方面存在显著差异。而非罪犯病变(NCL)在两组之间的MACE、MI、血运重建和再次住院方面显示出差异。

结论

就所有病变、CL和NCL而言,糖尿病患者的MACE、MI和血运重建发生率高于非糖尿病患者。除CL外,不稳定或进行性心绞痛的再入院率更高。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的斑块特征相似。Prospero注册号CRD42023474226。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa4/11660669/da16de549ede/13019_2024_3157_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验