Valle-Palomino Nicolás, Talledo-Sebedón Danae de Lourdes, Fernández-Mantilla Mirtha Mercedes, Córdova-Cánova Boris Ricardo, Saldarriaga-Villar Miguel Ángel, Montero-Chuyes María de Fátima, Orlandini-Valle Brunella, Carrera-Risco Mariana Belén, Reyes-Quezada Favio André, Vela-Miranda Óscar Manuel
Universidad César Vallejo, Piura, Perú.
Universidad César Vallejo, Trujillo, Perú.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;12(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02272-w.
Anxiety and depression are two of the main psychological disorders that affect thousands of people in the world, including university students. This research is justified because it seeks to reevaluate, compare and confirm the psychometric properties and establish the sociodemographic profile of the Anxiety and Depression Disorders Symptom Scale in Peruvian university students. The main objective of this study was to determine the evidence of psychometric properties, and the sociodemographic profile, of the Symptom Scale for Anxiety and Depression Disorders in university students from the region of Piura, Peru.
The sample was determined using proportional, probabilistic sampling that included 6 universities in Piura, Peru, consisting of 1243 participants. The scale has 35 Items within 7 subscales.
The results identified that the items fall within the range of ± 1.5 for skewness and kurtosis, except for items 22 and 35. The construct validity, assessed through factor analysis, shows that 100% of the items achieve scores greater than 0.5, with a significance level of less than < 0.001. The goodness-of-fit index through confirmatory factor analysis aligns with the transdiagnostic theoretical model, with scores for CFI and TLI ≥ 0.90, and for RMSEA and SRMR ≤ 0.60. The scale demonstrates adequate composite reliability according to MacDonald's Omega Coefficient (0.959). Furthermore, there is a moderate significant association (p = 0.001; γ = - 0.192) between age, the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms. A strong significant association (p = 0.001; γ = 0.365) is observed between sex and the presence of core symptoms of anxiety and depression.
In conclusion, the scale evidence an adequate psychometric consistency, presenting itself as a valid and reliable instrument. Of the university students evaluated, it was generally identified that 24% reach a high level and 50% reach a moderate level of anxiety and depression symptoms. Additionally, being a woman and an adolescent increases the likelihood of presenting elevated levels of the symptoms evaluated by the scale.
焦虑和抑郁是影响全球数千人的两种主要心理障碍,包括大学生。这项研究具有合理性,因为它旨在重新评估、比较和确认秘鲁大学生焦虑和抑郁障碍症状量表的心理测量特性,并建立其社会人口学特征。本研究的主要目的是确定秘鲁皮斯科地区大学生焦虑和抑郁障碍症状量表的心理测量特性证据及其社会人口学特征。
采用比例概率抽样确定样本,包括秘鲁皮斯科的6所大学,共1243名参与者。该量表在7个分量表中有35个项目。
结果表明,除项目22和35外,各项目的偏度和峰度在±1.5范围内。通过因子分析评估的结构效度表明,100%的项目得分大于0.5,显著性水平小于<0.001。通过验证性因子分析得到的拟合优度指数与跨诊断理论模型一致,CFI和TLI得分≥0.90,RMSEA和SRMR得分≤0.60。根据麦克唐纳欧米茄系数(0.959),该量表显示出足够的组合信度。此外,年龄与焦虑和抑郁症状的存在之间存在中度显著关联(p = 0.001;γ = -0.192)。性别与焦虑和抑郁核心症状的存在之间存在强烈显著关联(p = 0.001;γ = 0.365)。
总之,该量表证明了足够的心理测量一致性,是一种有效且可靠的工具。在接受评估的大学生中,总体上确定有24%达到高水平,50%达到中度焦虑和抑郁症状水平。此外,女性和青少年出现该量表所评估症状高水平的可能性增加。