Levy Cynthia, Bowlus Christopher L
Schiff Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Hepatology. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001166.
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an enigmatic, autoimmune disease targeting the small intralobular bile ducts resulting in cholestasis and potentially progression to biliary cirrhosis. Primarily affecting middle-aged women, the diagnosis of PBC is typically straightforward, with most patients presenting with cholestatic liver tests and the highly specific antimitochondrial antibody. For decades, the foundational treatment of PBC has been ursodeoxycholic acid, which delays disease progression in most patients but has no impact on PBC symptoms. Large cohort studies of patients with PBC have established the benefit of maximizing the reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase levels with ursodeoxycholic acid and the need to add second-line agents in patients who do not achieve an adequate response. Advances in the understanding of bile acid physiology have led to the development of new agents that improve cholestasis in patients with PBC and are predicted to reduce the risk of disease progression. Obeticholic acid, the first second-line therapy to be approved for PBC, significantly improves liver biochemistries and has been associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes but is limited by its propensity to induce pruritus. Elafibranor and seladelpar are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists recently approved for use in patients with PBC, whereas bezafibrate and fenofibrate are available as off-label therapies. They also have shown biochemical improvements among patients with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid but may improve symptoms of pruritus. Herein, we review the patient features to consider when deciding whether a second-line agent is indicated and which agent to consider for a truly personalized approach to PBC patient care.
原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)是一种神秘的自身免疫性疾病,其靶标为小叶内小胆管,可导致胆汁淤积,并可能发展为胆汁性肝硬化。PBC主要影响中年女性,其诊断通常较为直接,大多数患者表现为胆汁淤积性肝功能检查异常以及具有高度特异性的抗线粒体抗体。几十年来,PBC的基础治疗药物一直是熊去氧胆酸,它能在大多数患者中延缓疾病进展,但对PBC症状并无影响。对PBC患者的大型队列研究已证实,使用熊去氧胆酸使血清碱性磷酸酶水平最大程度降低具有益处,并且对于未获得充分反应的患者需要加用二线药物。对胆汁酸生理学认识的进展促使了新型药物的研发,这些药物可改善PBC患者的胆汁淤积情况,并预计能降低疾病进展风险。奥贝胆酸是首个被批准用于PBC的二线治疗药物,它能显著改善肝脏生化指标,并与改善长期临床结局相关,但因其易于诱发瘙痒而受到限制。依拉伐诺和塞拉地帕是最近被批准用于PBC患者的过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体激动剂,而苯扎贝特和非诺贝特可作为非适应证用药。它们在对熊去氧胆酸反应不佳的患者中也显示出了生化指标的改善,但可能会改善瘙痒症状。在此,我们回顾在决定是否需要使用二线药物以及考虑使用哪种药物以真正实现PBC患者个性化治疗时应考虑的患者特征。