Nunna Ravi S, Gruber Maxwell D, Karuparti Sasidhar, Taylor Zachary, Genovese Sabrina, Jumah Fareed, Godolias Periklis, Tataryn Zachary, Hollern Douglas, Oskouian Rod, Chapman Jens R
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2514-2535. doi: 10.1177/21925682241310864. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Study DesignSystematic Review Study.ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.ResultsOf the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.ConclusionsThere is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.
系统评价研究。
本研究的目的是评估重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2(rhBMP-2)在脊柱手术中的成本效益和成本效用。
系统检索PubMed、MEDLINE、OVID和CENTRAL(Cochrane对照试验中心注册库)数据库,查找报告rhBMP-2用于脊柱手术并与自体骨和/或异体骨及其他替代移植材料进行比较的研究,同时考虑成本效益、成本效益、成本最小化和/或成本效用分析。提取并整理相关数据点。使用CHEERS标准对所选研究的标准化进行评分。
在88篇符合条件的出版物中,17篇符合纳入标准。总体而言,8项研究显示出有利的成本分析概况。3项研究进行了成本后果分析,均未报告阳性结果。在7项成本效用分析和7项成本效益分析中,分别有3项和5项报告rhBMP-2的使用可能有益。纳入研究的CHEERS评分在24分中从15分到23分不等,中位数为19分。
关于rhBMP-2在脊柱融合中的成本效益或成本效用尚无共识。在某些情况下,rhBMP-2可能作为脊柱融合手术中具有成本效益的辅助手段。