当堕胎合法受限时的伦理研究。
Ethical research when abortion access is legally restricted.
机构信息
Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
出版信息
Science. 2023 Jun 23;380(6651):1224-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.adh3104. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
Abstract
Risks and benefits of some clinical research may be altered.
摘要
一些临床研究的风险和获益可能会发生改变。
相似文献
1
Ethical research when abortion access is legally restricted.
Science. 2023 Jun 23;380(6651):1224-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.adh3104. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Abortion in Islamic Ethics, and How it is Perceived in Turkey: A Secular, Muslim Country.
J Relig Health. 2017 Jun;56(3):884-895. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0277-9.
3
Another Defense of Abortion: What Transplant Ethics Tells Us about the Ethics of Abortion after Dobbs.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 May;54(3):28-34. doi: 10.1002/hast.1582.
4
Ethical Conflicts for Clinicians under Tennessee Abortion Law.
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 11;388(19):1735-1737. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2303213. Epub 2023 May 6.
5
Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Aug;44(8):513-517. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104728. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Ethical aspects concerning termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Jul;102(1):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.03.002.
7
[Abortion: legal, deontological and ethical framework].
Acta Med Port. 2011 Dec;24 Suppl 4:791-8. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
8
Abortion and postabortion care: ethical, legal, and policy issues in developing countries.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;50(4):341-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.03.004.
9
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1695-1696. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453.
10
Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective.
J Perinatol. 2024 May;44(5):628-634. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01884-9. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
引用本文的文献
1
Clinical Psychology in the Post-Dobbs Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1177/21677026251346150.
2
Epigenetic signatures in surrogate tissues are able to assess cancer risk and indicate the efficacy of preventive measures.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 2;5(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00779-w.
3
Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S73-S83. doi: 10.1002/hast.4932.
4
Meta-analysis of Pregnancy Events in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Gender Transformative Trials.
AIDS Behav. 2024 Nov;28(11):3850-3872. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04459-z. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;38(7):627-634. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13080. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
6
Renewed calls for abortion-related research in the post-Roe era.
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 18;11:1322299. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322299. eCollection 2023.
7
Teratology research in the shadow of the Dobbs decision.
Birth Defects Res. 2023 Aug 15;115(14):1315-1321. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2241. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
本文引用的文献
1
Roe v Wade's 50th Anniversary: New Legal Frontiers for Safeguarding Reproductive Freedoms.
JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):877-878. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1004.
2
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1695-1696. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453.
3
Scientific, ethical, and legal considerations for the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):805-811. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.037. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Ending the constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
BMJ. 2022 Aug 1;378:o1897. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1897.
5
Key lessons and strategies for implementing single IRB review in the Trial Innovation Network.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr 19;6(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.391. eCollection 2022.
6
The feasibility of recruiting and retaining men who have sex with men and transgender women in a multinational prospective HIV prevention research cohort study in sub-Saharan Africa (HPTN 075).
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Oct;23 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):e25600. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25600.
7
New and Improved? 21 Century Cures Act Revisions to Certificates of Confidentiality.
Am J Law Med. 2018 May;44(2-3):343-358. doi: 10.1177/0098858818789431.
8
Development and implementation of participant safety plans for international research with stigmatised populations.
Lancet HIV. 2018 Aug;5(8):e468-e472. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30073-0. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
9
Ethical issues in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs.
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):239-45. doi: 10.1177/1740774513505157. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Sustaining public trust: falling short in the protection of human research participants.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 May-Jun;38(3):8-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0012.
Zotero 插件