Braun Ashlea C, Portner James, Grainger Elizabeth M, Clinton Steven K, Xu Menglin, Darragh Amy, Pratt Keeley J, Weaver Lindy L, Spees Colleen K
Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02552-4.
Food is medicine (FIM) interventions are a strategy for preventing and managing chronic disease via diet. These interventions often combine the provision of food with access to behavior change support (e.g., from registered dietitians (RDs)), though the ideal approach for the latter is not fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to evaluate integrated motivational interviewing (MI) from an RD (RDMI) on outcomes among adults living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) with overweight and obesity enrolled in a FIM intervention (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03489213 (02/09/2018)). Specifically, RDMI with autonomy in the mode of delivery (i.e., phone, email, text, video) and dose (frequency) was offered within a 6-month intensive FIM intervention followed by a 6-month step-down maintenance phase. Dose and engagement with RDMI were measured. There were 52 and 33 participants who requested RDMI during the intensive and maintenance phases, respectively. Completion of ≥ 1 RDMI telephonic encounter significantly predicted weight loss post-intervention (R = 0.07, p = 0.03); there were no differences in dose, engagement, or weight loss based on the mode of delivery. The dose during the intensive intervention was moderately and significantly correlated with weight loss post-intervention and maintenance (r = 0.43, p < 0.01; r = 0.33, p = 0.02, respectively); there was a weak correlation for engagement at the same follow-up points (r = 0.28 and r = 0.15). In conclusion, higher doses of RDMI improved weight loss for adults LWBC with overweight or obesity. Careful consideration of the implementation of MI from providers, including RDs, in the context of cancer-focused FIM interventions should be further examined.
食物即药物(FIM)干预措施是一种通过饮食预防和管理慢性病的策略。这些干预措施通常将提供食物与获得行为改变支持(例如来自注册营养师(RD))相结合,不过后者的理想方法尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是评估注册营养师提供的综合动机性访谈(MI)对参加FIM干预(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03489213(2018年9月2日))的超重和肥胖癌症患者及癌症康复者(LWBC)结局的影响。具体而言,在为期6个月的强化FIM干预期间提供具有自主交付模式(即电话、电子邮件、短信、视频)和剂量(频率)的注册营养师动机性访谈(RDMI),随后是为期6个月的逐步减量维持阶段。测量了RDMI的剂量和参与度。在强化阶段和维持阶段分别有52名和33名参与者请求进行RDMI。完成≥1次RDMI电话访谈显著预测干预后体重减轻(R = 0.07,p = 0.03);基于交付模式的剂量、参与度或体重减轻没有差异。强化干预期间的剂量与干预后及维持期的体重减轻呈中度且显著相关(分别为r = 0.43,p < 0.01;r = 0.33,p = 0.02);在相同随访点参与度的相关性较弱(r = 0.28和r = 0.15)。总之,更高剂量的RDMI改善了超重或肥胖的癌症患者及癌症康复者的体重减轻情况。应进一步研究在以癌症为重点的FIM干预背景下,包括注册营养师在内的提供者实施动机性访谈的情况。