Feng Jiajun, Huang Yuqian, Hu Zhenbin, Guo Junjie
Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, No.1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510030, Guangdong, China.
Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou City Baiyun District Peoples Hospital, No. 23, Yuanxiadi Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510430, Guangdong, China.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 May;63(5):1343-1353. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03263-0. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the semantic segmentation model in predicting cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and heart enlargement and compare its consistency with the reference standard. A total of 650 consecutive chest radiographs from our center and 756 public datasets were retrospectively included to develop a segmentation model. Three semantic segmentation models were used to segment the heart and lungs. A soft voting integration method was used to improve the segmentation accuracy and measure CTR automatically. Bland-Altman and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to compare the consistency and correlation between CTR automated measurements and reference standards. CTR automated measurements were compared with reference standard using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The diagnostic efficacy of the model for heart enlargement was evaluated using the AUC. The soft voting integration model was strongly correlated (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and consistent (average standard deviation of 0.0048 cm/s) with the reference standard. No statistical difference between CTR automated measurement and reference standard in healthy subjects, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and lung mass patients (P > 0.05). In the external test data, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in determining heart enlargement were 96.0%, 79.5%, 99.1%, and 0.988, respectively. The deep learning method was calculated faster per chest radiograph than the average time manually calculated by the radiologist (about 2 s vs 25.75 ± 4.35 s, respectively, P < 0.001). This study provides a semantic segmentation integration model of chest radiographs to measure CTR and determine heart enlargement with chest structure changes due to different chest diseases effectively, faster, and accurately. The development of the automated segmentation integration model is helpful in improving the consistency of CTR measurement, reducing the workload of radiologists, and improving their work efficiency.
本研究的目的是探讨语义分割模型在预测心胸比率(CTR)和心脏扩大方面的有效性,并将其与参考标准的一致性进行比较。回顾性纳入了来自我们中心的650例连续胸部X线片和756个公共数据集,以建立分割模型。使用三种语义分割模型对心脏和肺部进行分割。采用软投票集成方法提高分割精度并自动测量CTR。使用Bland-Altman分析和Pearson相关分析来比较CTR自动测量值与参考标准之间的一致性和相关性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验将CTR自动测量值与参考标准进行比较。使用AUC评估模型对心脏扩大的诊断效能。软投票集成模型与参考标准高度相关(r = 0.98,P < 0.001)且一致性良好(平均标准差为0.0048 cm/s)。在健康受试者、气胸、胸腔积液和肺部肿块患者中,CTR自动测量值与参考标准之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。在外部测试数据中,确定心脏扩大的准确性、敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为96.0%、79.5%、99.1%和0.988。深度学习方法每张胸部X线片的计算速度比放射科医生手动计算的平均时间更快(分别约为2秒和25.75 ± 4.35秒,P < 0.001)。本研究提供了一种胸部X线片的语义分割集成模型,可有效、快速且准确地测量CTR并确定因不同胸部疾病导致胸部结构改变的心脏扩大情况。自动分割集成模型的开发有助于提高CTR测量的一致性,减轻放射科医生的工作量并提高其工作效率。