Wälchli Gwendolyn, Berger Thomas, Nissen Christoph, Moggi Franz, Bielinski Laura Luisa
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116326. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116326. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
The feasibility and the preliminary effectiveness of an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care were assessed with a randomized controlled pilot trial. Sixty patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group or treatment as usual (TAU). Feasibility was evaluated via patient satisfaction, system usability, and program usage. The primary outcome was symptom severity (Brief-Syptom-Inventory-18-GSI), secondary outcomes included two emotion regulation measures. Assessments occurred at baseline, after four weeks (T1), eight weeks (T2), and patient discharge. Satisfaction scores (CSQ-8: M = 2.97, SD = 0.64) and usability ratings (SUS: M = 69.89, SD = 10.34) were positive. Program usage was low, with only 12 of 30 patients completing at least 50 % of the program. In the ITT-analysis, no significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for symptom severity or emotion regulation. Descriptively, effect sizes favored the intervention for symptom severity at T1 (d = 0.16) and T2 (d = 0.12) and favored TAU for the emotion regulation parameters at both time points. Thus, while the internet-based program showed good usability and satisfaction, it did not significantly impact symptom severity or emotion regulation. Future research should examine how to enhance program use in this treatment context.
通过一项随机对照试验评估了在急性精神科住院治疗中增加基于互联网的情绪调节干预措施的可行性和初步效果。60名患者按1:1的比例被分配到干预组或常规治疗组(TAU)。通过患者满意度、系统可用性和程序使用情况来评估可行性。主要结局是症状严重程度(简明症状量表-18-总体严重程度指数),次要结局包括两项情绪调节指标。在基线、四周后(T1)、八周后(T2)以及患者出院时进行评估。满意度得分(CSQ-8:M = 2.97,SD = 0.64)和可用性评分(SUS:M = 69.89,SD = 10.34)均为阳性。程序使用率较低,30名患者中只有12名完成了至少50%的程序。在意向性分析中,未发现症状严重程度或情绪调节方面存在显著的组×时间交互效应。从描述性角度来看,效应量在T1(d = 0.16)和T2(d = 0.12)时倾向于干预组对症状严重程度的影响,而在两个时间点的情绪调节参数方面则倾向于常规治疗组。因此,虽然基于互联网的程序显示出良好的可用性和满意度,但它对症状严重程度或情绪调节没有显著影响。未来的研究应探讨如何在这种治疗背景下提高程序的使用率。