Sciascia Aaron, Jeffrey Grantham W, Stone Austin, Tremble Corey, Uhl Tim, Camp Christopher, Ben Kibler W
Institute for Clinical Outcomes and Research, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, KY, USA.
Department of Orthopedics-Sports Medicine, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, KY, USA.
J Sport Rehabil. 2024 Dec 20;34(5):523-535. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2024-0171. Print 2025 Jul 1.
A common component within rehabilitation recommendations for baseball pitchers is employment of an interval throwing program. However, there is a lack of a consistent set of advocated guidelines for program content and implementation for athletes at the professional and collegiate levels.
Cross-sectional study.
A survey was developed to obtain clinician views regarding the composition and implementation of interval throwing programs for baseball pitchers. The survey was divided into demographic information and sections on criteria to begin throwing programs, frequency of throwing, soreness management, warm-up components, program components and regulation of a program, and criteria to achieve permitting live throwing. Clinicians including physicians, physical therapists, and certified athletic trainers who evaluate and treat musculoskeletal injuries among baseball pitchers at the professional-level and/or collegiate-level clinician received the survey. Responses were tabulated and compared between the professional-level clinician and collegiate-level clinician groups using chi-square analyses with statistical significance set at P ≤ .05.
The survey was completed by 166 clinicians (collegiate level = 81, professional-level clinician = 85). There were no statistical differences between groups for allowing warm-up throws, program regulation, maximum distance allowed, managing soreness, or criteria to achieve before permitting live throwing. Between-group differences included criteria to begin a program (≤.03), warm-up distance (P ≤ .02), nonthrowing warm-up methods (P ≤ .04), non-warm-up distance (P ≤ .01), using ratings of perceived exertion (P < .01), throwing frequency (P < .01), and program components (P ≤ .04).
Responses appear to mirror interval throwing program designs previously reported in the literature but there are modifications and additions utilized by clinicians at different playing levels.
棒球投手康复建议中的一个常见组成部分是采用间歇投球计划。然而,对于职业和大学水平的运动员,缺乏一套关于计划内容和实施的统一倡导指南。
横断面研究。
开展一项调查,以获取临床医生对棒球投手间歇投球计划的组成和实施的看法。该调查分为人口统计学信息以及关于开始投球计划的标准、投球频率、疼痛管理、热身组成部分、计划组成部分和计划规则,以及允许进行实战投球的标准等部分。评估和治疗职业水平和/或大学水平棒球投手肌肉骨骼损伤的临床医生,包括医生、物理治疗师和认证运动训练师收到了该调查。使用卡方分析将专业水平临床医生组和大学水平临床医生组的回答制成表格并进行比较,设定统计学显著性为P≤0.05。
166名临床医生完成了调查(大学水平 = 81名,专业水平临床医生 = 85名)。在允许热身投球、计划规则、允许的最大距离、疼痛管理或允许实战投球前要达到的标准方面,两组之间没有统计学差异。组间差异包括开始计划的标准(≤0.03)、热身距离(P≤0.02)、非投球热身方法(P≤0.04)、非热身距离(P≤0.01)、使用主观用力程度评分(P<0.01)、投球频率(P<0.01)和计划组成部分(P≤0.04)。
回答似乎反映了文献中先前报道的间歇投球计划设计,但不同比赛水平的临床医生有一些修改和补充。