• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚三个州由紧急医疗服务响应的院外心脏骤停病例的特征与结局

Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases responded by emergency medical services across three states in Malaysia.

作者信息

Sarah A K, Mohd Sidqi M S, Md Noor J, Wong K D, Umul K M, Low M Y, Chia B Y, Sharifah F S A, Mahathar A W

机构信息

Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Emergency and Trauma Department, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Emergency and Trauma Department, Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2025 Mar;80(2):147-152.

PMID:40145155
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

IOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is globally a critical, time-sensitive emergency with varying outcomes. In Asia, the Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcome Study reported survival rates between 0.5% to 8.5%. We aim to describe the characteristics and outcomes of OHCA cases responded to by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) across several cities in Sarawak, Penang and Klang Valley in Malaysia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study analysed EMS data from Sarawak, Penang and Klang Valley from 2010 to 2019. All OHCA cases where EMS performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were included, regardless of age or aetiology. The primary outcome was survival to hospital admission with the secondary outcome a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) prior to Emergency Department arrival.

RESULTS

A total of 2,435 OHCA cases were analysed. Median patient age was 58 years, 70% of them are male with 63% had underlying medical conditions, with hypertension being the most common. Out of all cases, 71% of arrests occurred at home, 60% witnessed. Median time from arrest to 999 call was 20 minutes, median time for ambulance arrival thereafter is 17 minutes. Bystander CPR rate was 38%, bystander Automated External Defibrillator (AED) use 1.5- 2.6%. Detection of shockable rhythm on first analysis by EMS was 3.9 to 7.7%. Overall survival to admission rate was 4.76%. ROSC rate before Emergency Department arrival was 2.8%. Survival to admission among bystander-witnessed arrests with shockable rhythm was 14.7%.

CONCLUSION

Survival to admission rates for OHCA patients in the studied Malaysian regions (1.3-6.7%) are lower compared to some Asian countries. Areas for improvement include reducing time from arrest to 999 calls, decreasing time to EMS arrival, and increasing bystander CPR and AED use rates. Implementing the Utstein ten-step implementation strategy, focusing on community-based interventions and improving EMS response, could potentially enhance survival rates in Malaysia.

摘要

引言

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)在全球范围内都是一种危急且对时间敏感的紧急情况,其结果各不相同。在亚洲,泛亚复苏结局研究报告的生存率在0.5%至8.5%之间。我们旨在描述马来西亚砂拉越、槟城和巴生谷多个城市的紧急医疗服务(EMS)所应对的OHCA病例的特征和结局。

材料与方法

这项回顾性观察研究分析了2010年至2019年来自砂拉越、槟城和巴生谷的EMS数据。纳入所有EMS进行心肺复苏(CPR)的OHCA病例,无论年龄或病因如何。主要结局是存活至入院,次要结局是在急诊科到达之前恢复自主循环(ROSC)。

结果

共分析了2435例OHCA病例。患者中位年龄为58岁,其中70%为男性,63%有基础疾病,高血压最为常见。在所有病例中,71%的心脏骤停发生在家中,60%为有目击者的情况。从心脏骤停到拨打999的中位时间为20分钟,此后救护车到达的中位时间为17分钟。旁观者心肺复苏率为38%,旁观者自动体外除颤器(AED)使用率为1.5%至2.6%。EMS首次分析时可电击心律的检测率为3.9%至7.7%。总体存活至入院率为4.76%。急诊科到达之前的ROSC率为2.8%。有目击者且为可电击心律的心脏骤停患者存活至入院的比例为14.7%。

结论

与一些亚洲国家相比,所研究的马来西亚地区OHCA患者的存活至入院率(1.3%至6.7%)较低。需要改进的方面包括减少从心脏骤停到拨打999的时间、缩短EMS到达时间以及提高旁观者心肺复苏和AED使用率。实施乌斯坦十步实施策略,侧重于基于社区的干预措施并改善EMS反应,可能会提高马来西亚的生存率。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases responded by emergency medical services across three states in Malaysia.马来西亚三个州由紧急医疗服务响应的院外心脏骤停病例的特征与结局
Med J Malaysia. 2025 Mar;80(2):147-152.
2
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
3
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes of mass cardiac arrests caused by a crowd crush.旁观者心肺复苏与人群挤压导致的大规模心脏骤停的结局
Resuscitation. 2025 Jan;206:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110476. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Variations in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Performance and Outcomes in Ohio.俄亥俄州院外心脏骤停复苏表现及结果的差异
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 15;26(3):541-548. doi: 10.5811/westjem.19422.
5
Bystander CPR Technique and Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest With and Without Opioid Toxicity.旁观者心肺复苏术对伴有和不伴有阿片类药物中毒的心脏骤停的技术及效果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16340.
6
Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.院外心脏骤停生存的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
7
Incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from initial asystole: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初始心搏停止所致院外心脏骤停的发病率及转归:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Resuscitation. 2025 Jul;212:110629. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110629. Epub 2025 May 3.
8
Effectiveness of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.机械胸外按压设备与手动心肺复苏的效果比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 19;22(4):810-819. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50932.
9
Bystander automated external defibrillator use and clinical outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.旁观者使用自动体外除颤器与院外心脏骤停后临床结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Global variation in the incidence and outcome of emergency medical services witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球范围内,急救医疗服务目击的院外心脏骤停发生率和结局存在差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jun;175:120-132. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.03.026. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use an automated external defibrillator (AED) among non-healthcare community participants in a CPR fun run.影响心肺复苏趣味跑中非医疗社区参与者进行心肺复苏(CPR)及使用自动体外除颤器(AED)意愿的因素
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):2944. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24412-6.