• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性护理手术模式下胃肠道穿孔患者的预后因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Sung Kiyoung, Hwang Sanguk, Lee Jaeheon, Cho Jinbeom

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Artificial Intelligence, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02687-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02687-7
PMID:39709362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a life-threatening condition that necessitates immediate surgical intervention. This study aims to identify prognostic factors in patients with GIP treated within a standardized acute care surgery (ACS) framework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single center retrospective cohort study analyzed patients diagnosed with GIP who underwent emergent surgery and were admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2013 and March 2023.

RESULTS

Among 354 patients, the mortality was 11%, and 38% of survivors experienced significant complications (Clavien-Dindo class III or higher). Independent prognostic factors for mortality included initial sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (at the time of admission or ACS activation), postoperative SOFA (p-SOFA) scores, and postoperative body temperatures. For morbidity, independent predictors were the extent of peritonitis, the open surgery, postoperative albumin levels, and p-SOFA scores. These factors showed significant predictive accuracy for patient outcomes, as evidenced by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Random Forest model identified p-SOFA scores and postoperative albumin levels as the most significant predictors for both survival and complications, with feature importances of 40.46% and 36.61% for survival, and 39.97% and 37.28% for complications, respectively. Postoperative body temperature also played a moderately important role, contributing 14.63% to mortality and 15.9% to morbidity predictions. Patients with a p-SOFA score ≥ 7, postoperative albumin ≤ 2, and body temperature ≤ 36 °C, as well as those with a p-SOFA score ≥ 10, albumin ≤ 2.9, and body temperature ≤ 36 °C, had a 100% mortality rate. These factors are critical indicators for predicting patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to establish a system that ensures rapid preoperative work-up, accurate surgical intervention, and evidence-based postoperative critical care. Implementing such a system and assessing patient outcomes after surgery using the identified factors could provide a more detailed evaluation.

摘要

背景

胃肠道穿孔(GIP)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要立即进行手术干预。本研究旨在确定在标准化急性护理手术(ACS)框架内接受治疗的GIP患者的预后因素。

材料与方法

这项单中心回顾性队列研究分析了2013年1月至2023年3月期间诊断为GIP并接受急诊手术且入住重症监护病房的患者。

结果

在354例患者中,死亡率为11%,38%的幸存者出现了严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo III级或更高)。死亡率的独立预后因素包括初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(入院时或ACS启动时)、术后SOFA(p-SOFA)评分和术后体温。对于发病率,独立预测因素是腹膜炎的程度、开放手术、术后白蛋白水平和p-SOFA评分。这些因素对患者预后具有显著的预测准确性,受试者工作特征曲线下面积证明了这一点。随机森林模型确定p-SOFA评分和术后白蛋白水平是生存和并发症的最重要预测因素,生存的特征重要性分别为40.46%和36.61%,并发症的特征重要性分别为39.97%和37.28%。术后体温也起到了中等重要的作用,对死亡率的贡献为14.63%,对发病率预测的贡献为15.9%。p-SOFA评分≥7、术后白蛋白≤2且体温≤36°C的患者,以及p-SOFA评分≥10、白蛋白≤2.9且体温≤36°C的患者,死亡率为100%。这些因素是预测患者预后的关键指标。

结论

建立一个确保快速术前检查、准确手术干预和循证术后重症监护的系统至关重要。实施这样一个系统并使用确定的因素评估术后患者预后可以提供更详细的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a152/11662852/3a97f2dcb009/12893_2024_2687_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a152/11662852/f2c4f760d92d/12893_2024_2687_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a152/11662852/3a97f2dcb009/12893_2024_2687_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a152/11662852/f2c4f760d92d/12893_2024_2687_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a152/11662852/3a97f2dcb009/12893_2024_2687_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study.急性护理手术模式下胃肠道穿孔患者的预后因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02687-7.
2
Colonic perforation due to colorectal cancer: predicting postoperative organ failure with a preoperative scoring system and selecting the optimal surgical method based on the prognosis.结直肠癌致结肠穿孔:术前评分系统预测术后器官衰竭,并根据预后选择最佳手术方式。
Surg Today. 2012 Nov;42(11):1082-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0220-y. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
3
The use of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS 3, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and lactate to predict mortality of surgical critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)、C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值及乳酸来预测外科危重症患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16204. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016204.
4
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Comparison of Four Intensive Care Scores in Predicting Outcomes After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-center Retrospective Study.四种重症监护评分在预测静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合术后结局中的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Jan;39(1):131-142. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.027. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
6
Increased Survival for Patients With Cirrhosis and Organ Failure in Liver Intensive Care and Validation of the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System.肝衰竭患者的生存增加和肝重症监护中的器官衰竭和慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评分系统的验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;13(7):1353-1360.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
7
Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对当代心脏重症监护病房人群死亡率的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 10;7(6):e008169. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008169.
8
Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.描述重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍:一项涉及 20000 名患者的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9.
9
Predictors of Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存预测因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0328. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
[Evaluation value of sequential organ failure assessment score for predicting the prognosis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to severe pneumonia].序贯器官衰竭评估评分对预测重症肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的评估价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Sep;33(9):1057-1062. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210115-00076.

本文引用的文献

1
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Acute Care Surgery Models Worldwide: A Systematic Review.全球急性护理外科学模式:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2020 Aug;44(8):2622-2637. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05536-9.
3
Risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with gastrointestinal perforation.胃肠道穿孔患者术后脓毒症的危险因素。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Feb 26;8(4):670-678. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.670.
4
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Intestinal Perforation.肠穿孔手术后发病和死亡的预测因素。
Ann Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;32(6):221-227. doi: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.221. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
5
Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.提高穿孔性消化性溃疡急诊手术效果的策略。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e51-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9368. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
6
Surgical delay is a critical determinant of survival in perforated peptic ulcer.手术时机是影响穿孔性消化性溃疡患者生存的关键决定因素。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jul;100(8):1045-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9175.
7
Perspective on fever: the basic science and conventional medicine.发热的认识:基础科学与常规医学。
Complement Ther Med. 2013 Apr;21 Suppl 1:S54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 17.
8
Random forests for genetic association studies.用于基因关联研究的随机森林算法。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2011;10(1):32. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1691. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Early peak temperature and mortality in critically ill patients with or without infection.有或无感染的重症患者的早期体温峰值与死亡率
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2478-3.
10
Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.多中心试验:围手术期方案减少消化性溃疡穿孔患者死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):802-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7429. Epub 2011 Mar 25.