Giusti Martina, Persiani Niccolò
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, 50134, Italy.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Dec 21;23(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02355-5.
From 2014 to 2021, Tunisian government had a firm will to implement a progressive decentralization of welfare state governance, as outlined in its democratic Constitution. The Tunisian public healthcare system was selected as a pilot sector for experimenting with decentralization to reduce disparities in access to and quality of health services across different regions. This paper aimed to formulate an effective strategy for healthcare system decentralization in low- and middle-income countries, drawing on past experiences of its implementation. Country case study resulted the best methodology to achieve that goal. Top heath management, figured out by regional hospitals' directors, was consulted to describe the technical, managerial and cultural "heritage" collected during the development process of the decentralization reform in public healthcare system in Tunisia. Findings revealed the Tunisian healthcare system decentralization should be, in first instance, the establishment of different decentralization paths according with regional pre-conditions, and then, of common protocols and procedures at national level for overcoming current differences between Tunisian territories. Decentralization process must be tailored to the specific needs of the regional Tunisian contexts to be effective but with a national control on that. Drawing from the Tunisian experience, proposed suggestions were valuable for the definition of an effective national healthcare system decentralization reform strategy more generally in low- and middle- income countries, especially in Middle East and North Africa region's countries. Due to the common recent democratic history and welfare state approach, these countries could use this "heritage" to apply effective decentralizing reform strategies for reducing territorial inequalities, in this case territorial health inequalities.
2014年至2021年期间,突尼斯政府坚定决心实施福利国家治理的渐进式分权,正如其民主宪法中所概述的那样。突尼斯公共医疗系统被选为试验分权的试点部门,以减少不同地区在获得医疗服务和医疗服务质量方面的差距。本文旨在借鉴其实施的过往经验,为低收入和中等收入国家的医疗系统分权制定有效战略。国别案例研究被证明是实现该目标的最佳方法。通过地区医院院长确定的顶级健康管理被咨询,以描述在突尼斯公共医疗系统分权改革发展过程中收集到的技术、管理和文化“遗产”。研究结果显示,突尼斯医疗系统分权首先应根据地区先决条件建立不同的分权路径,然后在国家层面制定共同的协议和程序,以克服突尼斯各地区目前存在的差异。分权过程必须根据突尼斯各地区的具体需求进行调整,以确保有效,但同时要有国家层面的管控。借鉴突尼斯的经验,所提出的建议对于更广泛地在低收入和中等收入国家,特别是中东和北非地区国家定义有效的国家医疗系统分权改革战略具有重要价值。由于近期共同的民主历史和福利国家模式,这些国家可以利用这一“遗产”来应用有效的分权改革战略,以减少地区不平等,在这种情况下即地区健康不平等。