• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于吲哚布芬的双联抗血小板治疗用于接受药物洗脱支架植入的多支冠状动脉疾病患者:来自OPTION试验的见解

Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation insight from the OPTION trial.

作者信息

Xu Lili, Xu Huajie, Wu Shujing, Zhang Huanyi, Cheng Kang, Wang Xiaoyan, Chen Manhua, Li Guangping, Huang Jiangnan, Lan Jun, Wei Guanghe, Zhao Xin, Qi Zhiyong, Qian Juying, Wu Hongyi, Ge Junbo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2025 Apr;282:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.007. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.007
PMID:39710353
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) preserves ischemic protection while limiting bleeding risk in patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of indobufen-based DAPT in patients with MVD.

METHODS

Patients in the OPTION trial were stratified based on the presence of MVD. We compared the ischemic and bleeding risks of indobufen-based DAPT (indobufen 100mg twice a day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) vs conventional DAPT (aspirin 100 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) in patients with and without MVD, using landmarks at 6 months and 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

RESULTS

Patients with MVD tended to be older and contained a higher prevalence of high-risk features. Compared with patients without MVD, those with MVD were at higher risk for net adverse clinical events and ischemic events. The risk of ischemic events between indobufen-based DAPT vs conventional DAPT was similar either in patients with MVD or without MVD during the first and second 6 months. During the first 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT decreased the risk of bleeding events consistently in patients with and without MVD. Of note, during the second 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT continually decreased the risk of bleeding events in patients with MVD but not in those without MVD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MVD, indobufen plus clopidogrel DAPT compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel DAPT could reduce the risk of bleeding events while preserving ischemic protection during both the first and second 6 months post-PCI. Indobufen presents an effective option for patients with MVD, especially those at high ischemic risk requiring DAPT beyond 6 months post-PCI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at www.chictr.org. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Indobufen vs Aspirin after Coronary Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: the OPTION Trial (ChiCTR-IIR-17013505).

摘要

背景

基于吲哚布芬的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在多支冠状动脉疾病(MVD)患者中是否能在限制出血风险的同时保持缺血保护作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查基于吲哚布芬的DAPT在MVD患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

OPTION试验中的患者根据是否存在MVD进行分层。我们比较了基于吲哚布芬的DAPT(吲哚布芬100mg,每日两次,加氯吡格雷75mg/d,共12个月)与传统DAPT(阿司匹林100mg/d加氯吡格雷75mg/d,共12个月)在有或无MVD的患者中的缺血和出血风险,采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后6个月和1年的时间节点。

结果

MVD患者往往年龄较大,且高危特征的患病率较高。与无MVD的患者相比,有MVD的患者发生净不良临床事件和缺血事件的风险更高。在第一个6个月和第二个6个月期间,基于吲哚布芬的DAPT与传统DAPT相比,有或无MVD的患者发生缺血事件风险相似。在第一个6个月期间,基于吲哚布芬的DAPT在有或无MVD的患者中均持续降低出血事件风险。值得注意的是,在第二个6个月期间,基于吲哚布芬的DAPT持续降低MVD患者的出血事件风险,但对无MVD的患者则无此作用。

结论

在MVD患者中,与阿司匹林加氯吡格雷DAPT相比,吲哚布芬加氯吡格雷DAPT在PCI术后的第一个和第二个6个月期间均可降低出血事件风险,同时保持缺血保护作用。吲哚布芬为MVD患者,尤其是那些在PCI术后6个月以上需要DAPT且缺血风险高的患者提供了一种有效的选择。

试验注册

该试验在www.chictr.org注册。冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入术后吲哚布芬与阿司匹林的随机对照试验:OPTION试验(ChiCTR-IIR-17013505)

相似文献

1
Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation insight from the OPTION trial.基于吲哚布芬的双联抗血小板治疗用于接受药物洗脱支架植入的多支冠状动脉疾病患者:来自OPTION试验的见解
Am Heart J. 2025 Apr;282:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.007. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
2
Indobufen or Aspirin on Top of Clopidogrel After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation (OPTION): A Randomized, Open-Label, End Point-Blinded, Noninferiority Trial.冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入术后氯吡格雷基础上加用吲哚布芬或阿司匹林(OPTION):一项随机、开放标签、终点设盲的非劣效性试验。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 17;147(3):212-222. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062762. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Rationale and Design of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Multi-Vessel Disease (DAPT-MVD): A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.冠状动脉多支血管病变(DAPT-MVD)患者双联抗血小板治疗的理由和设计:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70049. doi: 10.1002/clc.70049.
4
Extended Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs DAPT in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes at High Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: The OPT-BIRISK Randomized Clinical Trial.高缺血和出血风险的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的氯吡格雷单药治疗与 DAPT 治疗比较:OPT-BIRISK 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;9(6):523-531. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0534.
5
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
6
6- Versus 24-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Nonresistant to Aspirin: Final Results of the ITALIC Trial (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel).抗阿司匹林药物洗脱支架植入术后 6 个月与 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗:ITALIC 试验(停用氯吡格雷后 DES 是否仍有生命力)的最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.049.
7
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
8
The safety and efficacy of indobufen or aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.吲哚布芬或阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死患者的安全性和有效性。
Platelets. 2024 Dec;35(1):2364748. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2024.2364748. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
9
Prediction of Ischemic and Bleeding Events Using the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in an Unrestricted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Population.在不受限制的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗人群中使用双联抗血小板治疗评分预测缺血和出血事件。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006853.
10
One-Month Versus Three-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.高出血风险慢性肾脏病患者的 1 个月与 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 15;225:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of indobufen versus aspirin in reducing target vessel restenosis after drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease.一项比较吲哚布芬与阿司匹林在降低冠心病患者药物洗脱球囊血管成形术后靶血管再狭窄方面的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jun 23;80:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100716.
2
The correlation between proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and adiponectin in the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes mellitus.前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素/克新9型与脂联素在从糖尿病前期进展为2型糖尿病过程中的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93750-7.