• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《急性卒中管理问卷》土耳其语版本的信度与效度

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.

作者信息

Adadıoğlu Öznur, Acar Bilgehan Atılgan, Acar Türkan

机构信息

Internal Medicine Nursing Department, Sakarya University, Faculty of Health Science, Sakarya, Türkiye.

Department of Neurology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70191. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70191.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.70191
PMID:39711021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11664040/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current research was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ), developed to determine the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals.

METHODS

This methodological study was performed in a training and research hospital. Data were collected using the "Participant Interview Form" and the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was found to be 0.91. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), it was revealed that the scale, which was adapted to Turkish, consisted of 3-factor and 29 items, as in its original form. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the 3-factor structure of the scale. The ASMaQ exhibited strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96) and test-retest reliability (0.879).

CONCLUSION

The 29-item and three-dimensional structure of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire was revealed to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be utilized in evaluating the acute stroke management awareness of health-care professionals in the Turkish language and culture.

摘要

目的

开展本研究以检验土耳其语版急性卒中管理问卷（ASMaQ）的有效性和可靠性，该问卷旨在确定医护人员对急性卒中管理的认知情况。

方法

本方法学研究在一家培训和研究医院进行。使用“参与者访谈表”和急性卒中管理问卷收集数据。

结果

发现急性卒中管理问卷的内容效度指数（CVI）为0.91。探索性因素分析（EFA）结果显示，改编为土耳其语的该量表与原始形式一样，由3个因素和29个项目组成。验证性因素分析证实了该量表的3因素结构。ASMaQ表现出很强的内部一致性（克朗巴哈系数0.96）和重测信度（0.879）。

结论

急性卒中管理问卷的29个项目和三维结构被证明是一种有效且可靠的测量工具，可用于评估土耳其语言和文化背景中医护人员对急性卒中管理的认知情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b56/11664040/7edeebdd2c2e/BRB3-14-e70191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b56/11664040/06273a616831/BRB3-14-e70191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b56/11664040/7edeebdd2c2e/BRB3-14-e70191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b56/11664040/06273a616831/BRB3-14-e70191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b56/11664040/7edeebdd2c2e/BRB3-14-e70191-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire.《急性卒中管理问卷》土耳其语版本的信度与效度
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70191. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70191.
2
Headache Disability Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version.头痛残疾问卷：土耳其语版本的跨文化适应与验证
BMC Neurol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03987-4.
3
Turkish adaptation of the pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire-revised 2: Validity and reliability study in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy.《妊娠相关焦虑问卷修订版2》的土耳其语改编版：经产妇和初产妇妊娠中的效度和信度研究
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form.土耳其语版准备出院量表/简表的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Apr;26(3):295-301. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12547. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.中风公众污名量表：土耳其语版的效度与信度研究
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70003.
7
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Factor Analytic Adaptation Study of the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS) in Senior Nursing Students.格罗宁根反思能力量表（GRAS）在高级护理专业学生中的因素分析适应性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Jul;150:106690. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106690. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
9
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses.护士情境下实施领导力量表土耳其语版的有效性和信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11721-6.
10
Turkish validity and reliability study of the adolescent asthma self-efficacy questionnaire.青少年哮喘自我效能感问卷的土耳其有效性和可靠性研究。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;77:e450-e457. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of acute stroke management and the predictors among Malaysian healthcare professionals.马来西亚医护人员对急性脑卒中管理的认知及其影响因素。
PeerJ. 2022 Apr 20;10:e13310. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13310. eCollection 2022.
2
Effectiveness of an educational program on improving healthcare providers' knowledge of acute stroke: A randomized block design study.一项关于提高医疗服务提供者急性中风知识的教育项目的有效性：一项随机区组设计研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(2):93-98. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.02.002.
3
Healthcare professionals' competence in stroke care pathways: A mixed-methods systematic review.
医疗保健专业人员在脑卒中护理路径方面的能力：一项混合方法系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 May;30(9-10):1206-1235. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15612. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Knowledge of Acute Stroke Management Among Healthcare Professionals: Development and Validation of Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ).医护专业人员对急性脑卒中管理的认知：急性脑卒中管理问卷（ASMaQ）的制定与验证。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jan;30(1):105421. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105421. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
6
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践：入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
7
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI：他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
8
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Factors delaying management of acute stroke: An Indian scenario.急性中风治疗延迟的因素：印度的情况。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):224-230. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_20_17.
10
Stroke awareness among Dubai emergency medical service staff and impact of an educational intervention.迪拜紧急医疗服务人员的中风认知情况及一项教育干预措施的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 6;10(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2585-x.