• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在关节镜下肩袖修复术中,在肌间沟神经阻滞基础上加用竖脊肌平面导管阻滞对疼痛缓解及阿片类药物消耗的评估。

Evaluation of Pain Relief and Opioid Consumption With the Addition of an Erector Spinae Plane Catheter Block After an Interscalene Nerve Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

作者信息

Hsu Wei-Kuo, Liu Shu-Cheng, Chuang Hao-Chun, Wang Chi-Hsiu, Kuan Fa-Chuan, Hsu Kai-Lan, Su Wei-Ren, Hong Chih-Kai

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesia, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 21;12(12):23259671241303731. doi: 10.1177/23259671241303731. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23259671241303731
PMID:39711607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11663274/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block and interscalene nerve block (ISNB) on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) have been investigated separately.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether additional catheterization for the ESP block can decrease acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption above the ISNB and multimodal oral analgesics in patients after arthroscopic RCR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Included were patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR between January 1 and December 31, 2021, and received either ISNB (ISNB group) or additional ESP block catheterization (ESP block group) as part of their pain management. Patients who underwent concomitant shoulder procedures were excluded. Patient characteristics, surgical details, pre- and postoperative numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, rescue analgesic use, and possible opioid-related side effects were recorded. The primary outcome was the NPRS score immediately after surgery; secondary outcomes included rescue opioid use and opioid-related side effects until patients were discharged the next day. The Mann-Whitney test or the chi-square test was used for between-group comparisons. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine predictors for total opioid consumption.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were included-21 in the ISNB group and 33 in the ESP block group. The ESP block group exhibited significantly lower postoperative NPRS scores (2 ± 0.3 vs 3 ± 1.6 for ISNB; = .003), reduced opioid consumption during hospitalization (0.5 ± 1.3 vs 6.1 ± 8.3 morphine milligram equivalent [MME] for ISNB; < .001), and fewer opioid-related side effects (0 vs 3 for ISNB; = .022). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the analgesic protocol (β = 5.750; < .001) and the number of anchors used (β = 1.609; = .022) were independently correlated with higher opioid consumption. Subgroup analysis revealed that additional ESP block significantly reduced opioid consumption during repairs involving ≥2 tendons (7.6 ± 9 vs 0.5 ± 1.4 MME; < .001).

CONCLUSION

The study findings indicated that additional catheterization for the ESP block reduced postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and opioid-related side effects during the acute postoperative period of arthroscopic RCR when the ISNB and multimodal oral analgesics had already been administered. Future studies are needed to evaluate this treatment protocol.

摘要

背景

竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞和肌间沟神经阻滞(ISNB)对关节镜下肩袖修复术(RCR)的影响已分别进行了研究。

目的

评估在关节镜下RCR术后患者中,ESP阻滞额外置管是否能比ISNB和多模式口服镇痛药更有效地减轻术后急性疼痛并减少阿片类药物的使用。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

纳入2021年1月1日至12月31日期间接受初次关节镜下RCR且作为疼痛管理一部分接受ISNB(ISNB组)或额外ESP阻滞置管(ESP阻滞组)的患者。排除同时进行肩部其他手术的患者。记录患者特征、手术细节、术前和术后数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评分、补救镇痛药使用情况以及可能的阿片类药物相关副作用。主要结局是术后即刻的NPRS评分;次要结局包括直到次日患者出院时的补救阿片类药物使用情况和阿片类药物相关副作用。采用Mann-Whitney检验或卡方检验进行组间比较。进行多元线性回归分析以检查总阿片类药物消耗量的预测因素。

结果

共纳入54例患者,ISNB组21例,ESP阻滞组33例。ESP阻滞组术后NPRS评分显著更低(ISNB组为3±1.6,ESP阻滞组为2±0.3;P = 0.003),住院期间阿片类药物消耗量减少(ISNB组为6.1±8.3吗啡毫克当量[MME],ESP阻滞组为0.5±1.3;P < 0.001),且阿片类药物相关副作用更少(ISNB组为3例,ESP阻滞组为0例;P = 0.022)。多元线性回归分析表明,镇痛方案(β = -5.750;P < 0.001)和使用的锚钉数量(β = -1.609;P = 0.022)与更高的阿片类药物消耗量独立相关。亚组分析显示,在涉及≥2条肌腱的修复中,额外的ESP阻滞显著减少了阿片类药物消耗量(7.6±9与0.5±1.4 MME;P < 0. ... 01)。

结论

研究结果表明,在已给予ISNB和多模式口服镇痛药的情况下,ESP阻滞额外置管可减轻关节镜下RCR术后急性期的疼痛、阿片类药物消耗量及阿片类药物相关副作用。未来需要进一步研究评估该治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868d/11663274/9a69dcc7c002/10.1177_23259671241303731-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868d/11663274/9a69dcc7c002/10.1177_23259671241303731-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868d/11663274/9a69dcc7c002/10.1177_23259671241303731-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Pain Relief and Opioid Consumption With the Addition of an Erector Spinae Plane Catheter Block After an Interscalene Nerve Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.在关节镜下肩袖修复术中,在肌间沟神经阻滞基础上加用竖脊肌平面导管阻滞对疼痛缓解及阿片类药物消耗的评估。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 21;12(12):23259671241303731. doi: 10.1177/23259671241303731. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Opioid requirement after rotator cuff repair is low with a multimodal approach to pain.采用多模式镇痛方法,肩袖修复术后阿片类药物的需求较低。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):e399-e408. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
3
Liposomal bupivacaine after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair moderately decreases early postoperative pain and demonstrates equivocal opioid consumption compared to traditional interscalene nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of level 1 studies.关节镜下肩袖修复术后脂质体布比卡因与传统肌间沟神经阻滞相比,可适度减轻术后早期疼痛,且阿片类药物消耗量相当:一项对一级研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Feb 17:104190. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104190.
4
Clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae block for single-level lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized, case-control study.超声引导双侧竖脊肌肌间沟阻滞在单节段腰椎融合术中的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1873-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Continuous interscalene versus phrenic nerve-sparing high-thoracic erector spinae plane block for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全肩关节置换术中连续肌间沟阻滞与保留膈神经的高位胸段竖脊肌平面阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2022 May;69(5):614-623. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02216-1. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Continuous suprascapular nerve block compared with single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block for pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜肩袖修复术后连续锁骨上神经阻滞与单次肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞镇痛效果比较。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Nov 11;75:e2026. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2026. eCollection 2020.
7
A Comprehensive Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Rotator Cuff Surgery Reduces Pain, Opioid Use, and Side Effects.全面强化康复路径用于肩袖修补术可减轻疼痛、减少阿片类药物使用并降低副作用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1740-1751. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001684.
8
Erector spinae plane block vs. peri-articular injection for pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomised controlled trial.竖脊肌平面阻滞与关节周围注射用于肩关节镜手术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机对照试验
Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):301-310. doi: 10.1111/anae.15625. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
9
Retrospective study comparing outcomes of multimodal epidural and erector spinae catheter pain protocols after pectus surgery.回顾性研究比较了胸壁手术后多模式硬膜外和竖脊肌导管疼痛方案的结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Mar;58(3):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
10
A comparison of the effects of thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block in postoperative acute pain in spinal surgery.比较胸腰筋膜平面(TLIP)阻滞与竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞在脊柱手术后急性疼痛中的效果。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1129-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08097-2. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative nausea and vomiting in orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.正颌手术后恶心和呕吐:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;28(3):1019-1028. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01235-0. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Comparing preoperative and postoperative dexamethasone effects on analgesia duration in shoulder surgery.比较术前和术后地塞米松对肩部手术镇痛持续时间的影响。
iScience. 2024 Jan 24;27(2):109019. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109019. eCollection 2024 Feb 16.
3
Erector Spinae Plane Block as the Phrenic Nerve Sparing Anaesthetic Technique for Shoulder Arthroplasty.
竖脊肌平面阻滞作为保留膈神经的肩部置换术麻醉技术
Cureus. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):e41220. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41220. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Modified Double-Pulley And Rip-Stop Suture Bridge Technique In Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修补术中改良双滑轮及防撕裂缝线桥技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Jan 18;12(2):e301-e305. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.11.007. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Erector spinae plane block for rescue analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.关节镜下肩部手术后竖脊肌平面阻滞用于补救镇痛
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Mar;130(3):e422-e423. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.004. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
6
Quality of Recovery After Rotator Cuff Repair With Interscalene Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Interscalene Nerve Catheter.肌间沟注射脂质体布比卡因与肌间沟神经导管用于肩袖修复术后的恢复质量比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Nov 22;10(11):23259671221134819. doi: 10.1177/23259671221134819. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block at the Level of the Second Thoracic Vertebra With Suprascapular Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.在关节镜肩关节手术中,与肩胛上神经阻滞相比,第二胸椎水平竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后镇痛的比较。
Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):577-585.
8
Erector spinae plane block vs interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia management in patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy.竖脊肌平面阻滞与肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在肩关节镜术后镇痛管理中的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 12;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01687-5.
9
Continuous interscalene versus phrenic nerve-sparing high-thoracic erector spinae plane block for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全肩关节置换术中连续肌间沟阻滞与保留膈神经的高位胸段竖脊肌平面阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2022 May;69(5):614-623. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02216-1. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Improving opioid stewardship programs through shared decision-making.通过共同决策来改进阿片类药物管理计划。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 May-Jun;62(3):697-700. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 7.