Missey Florian, Acerbo Emma, Dickey Adam, Trajlinek Jan, Studnicka Ondrej, Lubrano Claudia, De Araujo E Silva Mariane, Brady Evan, Vsiansky Vit, Szabo Johanna Petra, Dolezalova Irena, Fabo Daniel, Pail Martin, Gutekunst Claire-Anne, Migliore Rosanna, Migliore Michele, Lagarde Stanislas, Carron Romain, Karimi Fariba, Astorga Raul, Cassara Antonino, Kuster Niels, Neufeld Esra, Bartolomei Fabrice, Pedersen Nigel Paul, Gross Robert, Jirsa Viktor, Drane Daniel, Brazdil Milan, Williamson Adam
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 14:2024.12.05.24303799. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.05.24303799.
Medication refractory focal epilepsy creates a significant challenge, with approximately 30% of patients ineligible for surgery due to the involvement of eloquent cortex in the epileptogenic network. For such patients with limited surgical options, electrical neuromodulation represents a promising alternative therapy. In this study, we investigate the potential of non-invasive temporal interference (TI) electrical stimulation to reduce epileptic biomarkers in patients with epilepsy by comparing intracerebral recordings obtained before, during, and after TI stimulation, to recordings during low and high kHz frequency (HF) sham stimulation. Thirteen patients with symptoms of mesiotemporal epilepsy (MTLE) and implanted with stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) depth electrodes received TI stimulation with an amplitude modulation (AM) frequency of 130Hz (df), where the AM was delivered with lower frequency kHz carriers (1kHz + 1.13kHz), or higher frequency carriers (9kHz + 9.13kHz), targeting the hippocampus, a common epileptic focus and consequently stimulation target in MTLE. Our results show that TI stimulation yields a statistically significant decrease in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) specifically fast ripples (FR), where the suppression is apparent in the hippocampal focus and propagation from the focus is reduced brain-wide. HF sham stimulation at 1kHz frequency also impacted the IED rate in the cortex, but without reaching the hippocampal focus. The HF sham effect diminished with increasing frequencies (2, 5, and 9kHz, respectively), specifically as a function of depth into the cortex. This depth dependence was not observed with the TI, independent of the employed carrier frequency (low or high kHz). Furthermore, a strong carry-over effect, i.e., suppression of epileptic biomarkers for a period of time after the end of stimulation, was observed for TI but not for kHz. Our findings underscore the possible application of TI in epilepsy, as an additional non-invasive brain stimulation tool, potentially offering opportunities to assess brain region response to electrical neuromodulation before committing to a deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implants. Our results further demonstrate distinct biophysical differences between kHz and focal AM stimulation.
药物难治性局灶性癫痫带来了重大挑战,约30%的患者因致痫网络中涉及明确的皮质而不符合手术条件。对于这类手术选择有限的患者,电神经调节是一种有前景的替代疗法。在本研究中,我们通过比较颞部干扰(TI)电刺激前、刺激期间和刺激后的脑内记录与低频和高频千赫兹(HF)假刺激期间的记录,来研究非侵入性TI电刺激降低癫痫患者癫痫生物标志物的潜力。13名患有内侧颞叶癫痫(MTLE)症状并植入立体脑电图(sEEG)深度电极的患者接受了频率调制(AM)频率为130Hz(df)的TI刺激,其中AM以较低频率千赫兹载波(1kHz + 1.13kHz)或较高频率载波(9kHz + 9.13kHz)传递,靶向海马体,这是MTLE中常见的癫痫病灶及相应的刺激靶点。我们的结果表明,TI刺激能使发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)和病理性高频振荡(HFOs),特别是快速涟漪(FR)在统计学上显著减少,这种抑制在海马体病灶中明显,且从病灶向全脑的传播减少。1kHz频率的HF假刺激也影响了皮质中的IED发生率,但未达到海马体病灶。HF假刺激效应随频率增加(分别为2kHz、5kHz和9kHz)而减弱,特别是作为皮质深度的函数。TI未观察到这种深度依赖性,与所采用的载波频率(低或高千赫兹)无关。此外,观察到TI有强烈的延续效应,即在刺激结束后的一段时间内抑制癫痫生物标志物,而千赫兹刺激则没有。我们的研究结果强调了TI在癫痫中的可能应用,作为一种额外的非侵入性脑刺激工具,可能为在决定进行深部脑刺激(DBS)或反应性神经刺激(RNS)植入之前评估脑区对电神经调节的反应提供机会。我们的结果进一步证明了千赫兹刺激和局灶性AM刺激之间明显的生物物理差异。