文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of regional disparities in China.

作者信息

Zhao Zhonghua, Jiang Xiongying, Wen Shiping, Hao Yanzhang

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, China.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 6;14:1491404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1491404. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1491404
PMID:39711961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11659146/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of combining camrelizumab with rivoceranib versus sorafenib as initial treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across different developmental regions in China. METHODS: Utilizing TreeAge Pro and data from the phase III randomized CARES-310 clinical trial, a model based on Markov state transitions was developed. Health state utility values were derived from the CARES-310 trial, and direct medical costs were obtained from relevant literature and local pricing data. The primary outcome measured was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained per person. The ICERs were compared against the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of different regions in China, including low-income ($16,426.80), medium-income ($34,319.01), and high-income regions ($81,036.63). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to assess the robustness and reliability of the model under various assumptions. A tornado diagram was used to illustrate the impact of parameter variations on the model's cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: For base case analysis, QALYs per person for the cohort receiving sorafenib were 0.91, with a corresponding cost of $8,860.97. For the cohort receiving camrelizumab plus rivoceranib, the QALYs per person were 1.71, with a corresponding cost of $16,190.72. The camrelizumab plus rivoceranib treatment group exhibited an increase of 0.80 QALYs and an additional expenditure of $7,329.75. The calculated ICER was $9,150.75 per QALY, which is below the WTP thresholds for all regions in China. The camrelizumab plus rivoceranib regimen is regarded as highly cost-effective in medium-income areas of China, with a probability of 99.9%. In high-income regions, the probability reaches 100.0%. Even in low-income regions, this regimen is considered 95.6% cost-effective. Sensitivity analysis further verified that these findings were robust across various assumptions. CONCLUSION: The combination of camrelizumab and rivoceranib as a treatment strategy not only improves health outcomes but also represents a cost-effective option across different developmental regions in China.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/9460a91e757f/fonc-14-1491404-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/36e35e012a43/fonc-14-1491404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/68c0570b1d8a/fonc-14-1491404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/aa0c8c3f6c6b/fonc-14-1491404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/a9ee24b2bf55/fonc-14-1491404-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/9460a91e757f/fonc-14-1491404-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/36e35e012a43/fonc-14-1491404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/68c0570b1d8a/fonc-14-1491404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/aa0c8c3f6c6b/fonc-14-1491404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/a9ee24b2bf55/fonc-14-1491404-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747f/11659146/9460a91e757f/fonc-14-1491404-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of regional disparities in China.

Front Oncol. 2024-12-6

[2]
First-Line Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A China-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024-11-23

[3]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System.

Clin Drug Investig. 2024-3

[4]
Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025-1-2

[5]
Economic evaluation of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States and China.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2024-10

[6]
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared sorafenib as first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BMJ Open. 2024-12-11

[7]
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CARES-310): a randomised, open-label, international phase 3 study.

Lancet. 2023-9-30

[8]
Promising first-line immuno-combination therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Cancer Med. 2024-8

[9]
Economic Evaluation of First-Line Camrelizumab for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in China.

Front Public Health. 2021

[10]
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab plus rivoceranib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a multicenter propensity score-matching analysis.

Hepatol Int. 2024-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
A bibliometric and visual analysis based on immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2014 - 2024.

Front Pharmacol. 2025-4-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Additional Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy to Sorafenib Was Cost-Effective for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024-7-30

[2]
Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Health Econ Rev. 2024-7-5

[3]
Defining clinically useful biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumours.

Nat Rev Cancer. 2024-7

[4]
Economic evaluation of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States and China.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2024-10

[5]
Patient-Reported Outcomes From the Phase III HIMALAYA Study of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

J Clin Oncol. 2024-8-10

[6]
Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024-6

[7]
Recommended 10-Year Follow-Up Strategy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiofrequency Ablation: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024-10-1

[8]
Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Targeted-Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Cost-effectiveness Analyses.

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024-6

[9]
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024-4

[10]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System.

Clin Drug Investig. 2024-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索