Cavedon Valentina, Sandri Marco, Zuccolotto Paola, Biasiolo Caterina, Zancanaro Carlo, Milanese Chiara
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
BODaI-Lab, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Dec 6;6:1471094. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1471094. eCollection 2024.
This study was planned to assess the association between serve efficacy and match outcome, and to investigate which factors are associated with serve efficacy in high-level male and female Sitting Volleyball players.
The study sample was comprised of a total of 3,664 serving actions, performed during the 2020 Paralympic Games and the 2022 Sitting Volleyball World Championship. For each serving action, we considered serve efficacy (i.e., Point lost, Negative Serve, Positive serve and Point won), serve zone, type of serve technique, target zone of the serve, type of reception, receiving player and match outcome (i.e., match won, or match lost).
The Mixed-effects logistic regression model showed that serve efficacy is significantly associated with the match outcome, increasing serve efficacy being associated with increased chances of winning the game. The ratio between the probability of winning and losing the game started at 0.86 for a Point lost and increased to 1.67 for a Point won. Compared to Negative serves, Positive serves were associated with a higher probability that the opponent team would use a low reception rather than a high reception. In turn, a low reception was associated with a higher chance (from 45.1% to 58.3%) of the receiving team committing an error in the side-out phase.
Based on these results, it is recommended that high-level coaches focus on improving their players' serve efficacy by instructing them on managing risk, avoiding serves to the front zone, and reducing the likelihood of overhead receptions.
本研究旨在评估发球效果与比赛结果之间的关联,并调查在高水平男女坐式排球运动员中,哪些因素与发球效果相关。
研究样本包括在2020年残奥会和2022年坐式排球世界锦标赛期间进行的总共3664次发球动作。对于每次发球动作,我们考虑了发球效果(即失分、负面发球、正面发球和得分)、发球区域、发球技术类型、发球目标区域、接发球类型、接发球球员和比赛结果(即比赛获胜或比赛失利)。
混合效应逻辑回归模型显示,发球效果与比赛结果显著相关,发球效果的提高与赢得比赛的机会增加相关。比赛胜负概率之比从失分情况下的0.86开始,到得分情况下增加到1.67。与负面发球相比,正面发球与对方球队采用低接发球而非高接发球的更高概率相关。反过来,低接发球与接发球球队在边出阶段犯错的更高几率(从45.1%到58.3%)相关。
基于这些结果,建议高水平教练通过指导球员管理风险、避免向前区发球以及降低头顶接发球的可能性,来专注于提高球员的发球效果。