Abbas Sumira, Khan Haris Ali, Rehman Wajeeha, Shah Mian Mufarih, Mustafa Muhammad, Abbas Muhammad
Pathology, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Hematology and Pathology, Peshawar Medical College, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 21;16(11):e74186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74186. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background Beta-thalassemia major is a genetic blood disease complicated by splenomegaly, and splenectomy is a standard therapy for this medical condition. Although splenectomy results not only in the improvement of the hematological status, the long-term consequences to the cardiovascular system are still questionable. Objective The aim of the study was to assess and compare the cardiovascular impact of splenomegaly and splenectomy in patients with beta-thalassemia major. Methodology This is a cross-sectional survey conducted at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January 2024 to June 2024. A total of 88 beta-thalassemia major patients were divided into two groups: 44 patients with splenomegaly were recruited and compared with 44 post-splenectomy patients. Outcomes that were assessed in this study from the medical records were cardiac function test, ejection fraction, left ventricular hypertrophy, thromboembolic incidences, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, blood pressure level, and the biochemical markers, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Results Patients with splenectomy exhibited slightly lower hemoglobin levels and higher transfusion requirements but had better ejection fractions compared to those with splenomegaly. In contrast, the splenomegaly group demonstrated worse cardiovascular outcomes, including higher rates of left ventricular hypertrophy, pulmonary hypertension, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and elevated BNP levels, indicating increased cardiovascular morbidity and hemodynamic strain. Logistic regression analysis further suggested that splenectomy reduces the risk of cardiomyopathy, particularly in younger patients, while the splenomegaly group experiences a greater burden of acute cardiovascular complications. Conclusion Splenectomy in beta-thalassemia major patients offers improved cardiac function and hemoglobin levels while reducing transfusion needs, but it does not eliminate the risks of long-term cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications, such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On the other hand, patients with splenomegaly face more severe and immediate cardiovascular risks, including hypertension, arrhythmias, and thromboembolic events. These findings underscore the importance of tailored management strategies to optimize outcomes for both groups.
重型β地中海贫血是一种伴有脾肿大的遗传性血液疾病,脾切除术是针对这种病症的标准治疗方法。尽管脾切除术不仅能改善血液学状况,但对心血管系统的长期影响仍存在疑问。
本研究旨在评估和比较重型β地中海贫血患者脾肿大及脾切除术后对心血管系统的影响。
这是一项于2024年1月至2024年6月在白沙瓦哈亚塔巴德医疗中心进行的横断面调查。总共88例重型β地中海贫血患者被分为两组:招募了44例脾肿大患者,并与44例脾切除术后患者进行比较。本研究从病历中评估的结果包括心脏功能测试、射血分数、左心室肥厚、血栓栓塞发生率、肺栓塞、深静脉血栓形成、血压水平以及生化标志物B型利钠肽(BNP)和肌钙蛋白。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)26版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)对数据进行分析。
与脾肿大患者相比,脾切除术后患者的血红蛋白水平略低,输血需求更高,但射血分数更好。相比之下,脾肿大组的心血管结局更差,包括左心室肥厚、肺动脉高压、心律失常、血栓栓塞事件发生率更高以及BNP水平升高,表明心血管发病率增加和血流动力学压力增大。逻辑回归分析进一步表明,脾切除术可降低心肌病风险,尤其是在年轻患者中,而脾肿大组急性心血管并发症负担更大。
重型β地中海贫血患者进行脾切除术后心脏功能和血红蛋白水平得到改善,输血需求减少,但并不能消除深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞等长期心血管和血栓栓塞并发症的风险。另一方面,脾肿大患者面临更严重和直接的心血管风险,包括高血压、心律失常和血栓栓塞事件。这些发现强调了制定个性化管理策略以优化两组患者结局的重要性。