• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Study Between Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units vs. Mixed Intensive Care Units in Key Performance Indicators.医疗/外科重症监护病房与混合重症监护病房关键绩效指标的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74100. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Impact of Big Data Analytics on Emergency Department Efficiency in Saudi Ministry of Health Hospitals: A Retrospective Data Analysis.大数据分析对沙特卫生部医院急诊科效率的影响:一项回顾性数据分析。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 6;18:775-784. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S503744. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating the performance of an institution using an intensive care unit benchmark.使用重症监护病房基准评估机构的绩效。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Feb;80(2):174-80. doi: 10.4065/80.2.174.
4
Are readmissions to the intensive care unit a useful measure of hospital performance?重症监护病房的再入院率是衡量医院绩效的有用指标吗?
Med Care. 1999 Apr;37(4):399-408. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199904000-00009.
5
Impact of an intensive care unit telemedicine program on patient outcomes in an integrated health care system.重症监护病房远程医疗项目对综合医疗体系中患者结局的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1160-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1503.
6
A cross-cultural comparison of critical care delivery: Japan and the United States.重症监护服务的跨文化比较:日本与美国
Chest. 2002 Feb;121(2):539-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.2.539.
7
Intensive care units in Croatia: 2001 survey.克罗地亚重症监护病房:2001年调查。
Croat Med J. 2002 Dec;43(6):713-21.
8
Effects of ICU characters, human resources and workload to outcome indicators in Thai ICUs: the results of ICU-RESOURCE I study.泰国重症监护病房中重症监护病房特征、人力资源和工作量对结局指标的影响:重症监护病房资源I研究结果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jan;97 Suppl 1:S22-30.
9
Outcomes among patients discharged from busy intensive care units.从繁忙的重症监护病房出院的患者的结局。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 1;159(7):447-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-7-201310010-00004.
10
Variation in rates of ICU readmissions and post-ICU in-hospital mortality and their association with ICU discharge practices.重症监护病房(ICU)再入院率和ICU后院内死亡率的差异及其与ICU出院实践的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2234-z.

本文引用的文献

1
ICU Staffing in the United States.美国的 ICU 人员配备。
Chest. 2024 Oct;166(4):743-753. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Case volume and specialization in critically ill emergency patients: a nationwide cohort study in Japanese ICUs.危重症急诊患者的病例量与专科化:一项日本重症监护病房的全国性队列研究
J Intensive Care. 2024 May 17;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00733-3.
3
Quality Indicators in Adult Critical Care Medicine.成人重症医学中的质量指标。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 May 2;7(2):75-84. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-23-30. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Personalized Medicine Transformed: ChatGPT's Contribution to Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Alarm Management in Intensive Care Units.个性化医疗的变革:ChatGPT对重症监护病房持续肾脏替代治疗警报管理的贡献。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 22;14(3):233. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030233.
5
ChatGPT-4 and the Global Burden of Disease Study: Advancing Personalized Healthcare Through Artificial Intelligence in Clinical and Translational Medicine.ChatGPT-4与全球疾病负担研究:通过临床与转化医学中的人工智能推动个性化医疗
Cureus. 2023 May 23;15(5):e39384. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39384. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Impact of Implementing Key Performance Indicators on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Rates Among Adult ICU Patients in Saudi Arabia.实施关键绩效指标对沙特阿拉伯成年重症监护病房患者导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)发生率的影响
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jan 19;15:41-49. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S396160. eCollection 2023.
7
Intensive care unit models: Do you want them to be open or closed? A critical review.重症监护病房模式:你希望它们是开放式还是封闭式?一项批判性综述。
Neurol India. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):39-45. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.198205.
8
What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine.什么是重症监护病房?国际重症与危重症医学学会联合会特别工作组报告。
J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Changes after transformation from a specialized surgical unit to a general mixed intensive care unit.从专科外科病房转变为综合混合重症监护病房后的变化。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014 Jan-Mar;37(1):115-24. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000010.
10
Key performance indicators in intensive care medicine. A retrospective matched cohort study.重症医学中的关键绩效指标。一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1267-84. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700502.

医疗/外科重症监护病房与混合重症监护病房关键绩效指标的比较研究

Comparative Study Between Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units vs. Mixed Intensive Care Units in Key Performance Indicators.

作者信息

Alarifi Mohammed I, Mostafa Omnia Ali Ibrahim, Alballaa Rashid, Alqahtani Rakan M, Almutawa Nasser A, Almutawa Faisal, Almutawa Renad A, Almutawa Rema A, Almusahel Elaf, Alyahya Lama, AlNahdi Maha M, Alsaadon Abdulrahman, Temsah Mohamad-Hani

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74100. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.74100
PMID:39712857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11661697/
Abstract

Background This comparative study evaluates the performance of medical/surgical and mixed intensive care units (ICUs) at a tertiary care university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using key performance indicators (KPIs). Since its establishment in 1982, the hospital has provided comprehensive medical services, including specialized, closed-model ICUs, including medical, surgical, and pediatric ICUs. In 2021, these ICUs transitioned to a mixed ICU model to enhance efficiency and patient care. This study aims to assess the impact of this transition on various KPIs, including mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS), bed occupancy rate (bOR), ICU readmission rate within 48 hours, unplanned extubation, glycemic control, and delayed ICU discharge. Methodology Data from 2018 to 2022 were analyzed, comparing the separate medical and surgical ICUs model (2018-2020) with the mixed ICU model (2021-2022). Statistical analyses were performed, including independent t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA), to determine significant differences between the ICU models. Results The transition to the mixed ICU model significantly improved several KPIs. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) decreased from 0.575 in the specialized ICU model to 0.399 in the mixed ICU model, reflecting a marked improvement in patient outcomes. The average LOS also reduced from 4.989 days in the specialized ICUs to 4.481 days in the mixed ICU model. Additionally, the bOR significantly dropped from 91.00% to 72.08% ( = 0.000), enhancing resource efficiency. Readmission rates within 48 hours were reduced from 0.883 to 0.475 and delayed ICU discharge rates also improved, falling from 34.59% to 23.31%. Our findings revealed that the mixed ICU model outperformed the specialized ICU in most KPIs, reflecting notable enhancements in operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Conclusions The transition to a mixed ICU model led to significant improvements in KPIs, including reductions in mortality rate and average LOS, alongside enhanced bOR and lower readmission rates within 48 hours. Delayed ICU discharge rates and glycemic control also showed notable positive changes. These improvements likely stem from the interdisciplinary expertise and flexibility of the mixed ICU environment, which supports better resource allocation and patient care. The study underscores the potential of mixed ICUs to optimize both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency in hospitals. Implementing such models can serve as a robust strategy for improving ICU performance. However, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects and assess the applicability of this model in diverse healthcare settings to fully validate its benefits.

摘要

背景 本比较研究使用关键绩效指标(KPI)评估了沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医疗大学医院的内科/外科重症监护病房(ICU)和混合重症监护病房的绩效。自1982年成立以来,该医院提供全面的医疗服务,包括专门的封闭式ICU,涵盖内科、外科和儿科ICU。2021年,这些ICU转变为混合ICU模式以提高效率和改善患者护理。本研究旨在评估这一转变对各项KPI的影响,包括死亡率、ICU住院时长(LOS)、床位占用率(bOR)、48小时内ICU再入院率、非计划拔管、血糖控制以及ICU延迟出院情况。

方法 分析了2018年至2022年的数据,将独立的内科和外科ICU模式(2018 - 2020年)与混合ICU模式(2021 - 2022年)进行比较。进行了统计分析,包括独立t检验和方差分析(ANOVA),以确定ICU模式之间的显著差异。

结果 向混合ICU模式的转变显著改善了多项KPI。标准化死亡率(SMR)从专门ICU模式下的0.575降至混合ICU模式下的0.399,这反映出患者预后有显著改善。平均LOS也从专门ICU的4.989天降至混合ICU模式下的4.481天。此外,bOR从91.00%显著降至72.08%(P = 0.000),提高了资源利用效率。48小时内再入院率从0.883降至0.475,ICU延迟出院率也有所改善,从34.59%降至23.31%。我们的研究结果表明,在大多数KPI方面,混合ICU模式优于专门ICU模式,这反映出运营效率和患者预后有显著提升。

结论 向混合ICU模式的转变导致KPI有显著改善,包括死亡率和平均LOS降低,同时bOR提高,48小时内再入院率降低。ICU延迟出院率和血糖控制也呈现出显著的积极变化。这些改善可能源于混合ICU环境中的多学科专业知识和灵活性,这有助于更好地进行资源分配和患者护理。该研究强调了混合ICU在优化医院临床结局和运营效率方面的潜力。实施这种模式可作为提高ICU绩效的有力策略。然而,需要进一步研究来评估其长期影响,并评估该模式在不同医疗环境中的适用性,以充分验证其益处。