Alarifi Mohammed I, Mostafa Omnia Ali Ibrahim, Alballaa Rashid, Alqahtani Rakan M, Almutawa Nasser A, Almutawa Faisal, Almutawa Renad A, Almutawa Rema A, Almusahel Elaf, Alyahya Lama, AlNahdi Maha M, Alsaadon Abdulrahman, Temsah Mohamad-Hani
Department of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74100. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background This comparative study evaluates the performance of medical/surgical and mixed intensive care units (ICUs) at a tertiary care university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using key performance indicators (KPIs). Since its establishment in 1982, the hospital has provided comprehensive medical services, including specialized, closed-model ICUs, including medical, surgical, and pediatric ICUs. In 2021, these ICUs transitioned to a mixed ICU model to enhance efficiency and patient care. This study aims to assess the impact of this transition on various KPIs, including mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS), bed occupancy rate (bOR), ICU readmission rate within 48 hours, unplanned extubation, glycemic control, and delayed ICU discharge. Methodology Data from 2018 to 2022 were analyzed, comparing the separate medical and surgical ICUs model (2018-2020) with the mixed ICU model (2021-2022). Statistical analyses were performed, including independent t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA), to determine significant differences between the ICU models. Results The transition to the mixed ICU model significantly improved several KPIs. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) decreased from 0.575 in the specialized ICU model to 0.399 in the mixed ICU model, reflecting a marked improvement in patient outcomes. The average LOS also reduced from 4.989 days in the specialized ICUs to 4.481 days in the mixed ICU model. Additionally, the bOR significantly dropped from 91.00% to 72.08% ( = 0.000), enhancing resource efficiency. Readmission rates within 48 hours were reduced from 0.883 to 0.475 and delayed ICU discharge rates also improved, falling from 34.59% to 23.31%. Our findings revealed that the mixed ICU model outperformed the specialized ICU in most KPIs, reflecting notable enhancements in operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Conclusions The transition to a mixed ICU model led to significant improvements in KPIs, including reductions in mortality rate and average LOS, alongside enhanced bOR and lower readmission rates within 48 hours. Delayed ICU discharge rates and glycemic control also showed notable positive changes. These improvements likely stem from the interdisciplinary expertise and flexibility of the mixed ICU environment, which supports better resource allocation and patient care. The study underscores the potential of mixed ICUs to optimize both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency in hospitals. Implementing such models can serve as a robust strategy for improving ICU performance. However, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects and assess the applicability of this model in diverse healthcare settings to fully validate its benefits.
背景 本比较研究使用关键绩效指标(KPI)评估了沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医疗大学医院的内科/外科重症监护病房(ICU)和混合重症监护病房的绩效。自1982年成立以来,该医院提供全面的医疗服务,包括专门的封闭式ICU,涵盖内科、外科和儿科ICU。2021年,这些ICU转变为混合ICU模式以提高效率和改善患者护理。本研究旨在评估这一转变对各项KPI的影响,包括死亡率、ICU住院时长(LOS)、床位占用率(bOR)、48小时内ICU再入院率、非计划拔管、血糖控制以及ICU延迟出院情况。
方法 分析了2018年至2022年的数据,将独立的内科和外科ICU模式(2018 - 2020年)与混合ICU模式(2021 - 2022年)进行比较。进行了统计分析,包括独立t检验和方差分析(ANOVA),以确定ICU模式之间的显著差异。
结果 向混合ICU模式的转变显著改善了多项KPI。标准化死亡率(SMR)从专门ICU模式下的0.575降至混合ICU模式下的0.399,这反映出患者预后有显著改善。平均LOS也从专门ICU的4.989天降至混合ICU模式下的4.481天。此外,bOR从91.00%显著降至72.08%(P = 0.000),提高了资源利用效率。48小时内再入院率从0.883降至0.475,ICU延迟出院率也有所改善,从34.59%降至23.31%。我们的研究结果表明,在大多数KPI方面,混合ICU模式优于专门ICU模式,这反映出运营效率和患者预后有显著提升。
结论 向混合ICU模式的转变导致KPI有显著改善,包括死亡率和平均LOS降低,同时bOR提高,48小时内再入院率降低。ICU延迟出院率和血糖控制也呈现出显著的积极变化。这些改善可能源于混合ICU环境中的多学科专业知识和灵活性,这有助于更好地进行资源分配和患者护理。该研究强调了混合ICU在优化医院临床结局和运营效率方面的潜力。实施这种模式可作为提高ICU绩效的有力策略。然而,需要进一步研究来评估其长期影响,并评估该模式在不同医疗环境中的适用性,以充分验证其益处。