• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症医学中的关键绩效指标。一项回顾性匹配队列研究。

Key performance indicators in intensive care medicine. A retrospective matched cohort study.

作者信息

Kastrup M, von Dossow V, Seeling M, Ahlborn R, Tamarkin A, Conroy P, Boemke W, Wernecke K-D, Spies Claudia

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1267-84. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700502.

DOI:10.1177/147323000903700502
PMID:19930832
Abstract

Expert panel consensus was used to develop evidence-based process indicators that were independent risk factors for the main clinical outcome parameters of length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. In a retrospective, matched data analysis of patients from five ICUs at a tertiary university hospital, agreed process indicators (sedation monitoring, pain monitoring, mean arterial pressure [MAP] >or= 60 mmHg, tidal volume [TV] <or= 6 ml/kg body weight, peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] <or= 35 cmH(2)O and blood glucose [BG] >or= 80 and <or= 130 mg/dl) were validated using a prospective dataset of 4445 consecutive patients. After matching for age, sex and ICU, 634 patients were analysed. Logistic regression of the 634 patients showed that monitoring analgesia and sedation, MAP >or= 60 mmHg and BG >or= 80 mg/dl were relevant for survival. Linear regression of the 634 patients showed that analgesia monitoring, PIP <or= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <or= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay. Linear regression on all 4445 patients showed analgesia, sedation monitoring, MAP >or= 60 mmHg, BG >or= 80 mg/dl and <or= 130 mg/dl, PIP <or= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <or= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay, indicating that adherence to evidence-based key process indicators may reduce mortality and length of ICU stay.

摘要

专家小组达成共识,制定了基于证据的过程指标,这些指标是重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和死亡率等主要临床结局参数的独立危险因素。在一所三级大学医院对五个ICU的患者进行回顾性匹配数据分析时,使用4445例连续患者的前瞻性数据集对商定的过程指标(镇静监测、疼痛监测、平均动脉压[MAP]≥60 mmHg、潮气量[TV]≤6 ml/kg体重、吸气峰压[PIP]≤35 cmH₂O和血糖[BG]≥80且≤130 mg/dl)进行了验证。在对年龄、性别和ICU进行匹配后,对634例患者进行了分析。对这634例患者的逻辑回归分析表明,监测镇痛和镇静、MAP≥60 mmHg以及BG≥80 mg/dl与生存相关。对这634例患者的线性回归分析表明,镇痛监测、PIP≤35 cmH₂O以及TV≤6 ml/kg与ICU住院时间缩短相关。对所有4445例患者的线性回归分析表明,镇痛、镇静监测、MAP≥60 mmHg、BG≥80 mg/dl且≤130 mg/dl、PIP≤35 cmH₂O以及TV≤6 ml/kg与ICU住院时间缩短相关,这表明遵循基于证据的关键过程指标可能降低死亡率和ICU住院时间。

相似文献

1
Key performance indicators in intensive care medicine. A retrospective matched cohort study.重症医学中的关键绩效指标。一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1267-84. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700502.
2
I-SAVE study: impact of sedation, analgesia, and delirium protocols evaluated in the intensive care unit: an economic evaluation.I-SAVE 研究:在重症监护病房评估镇静、镇痛和谵妄方案的影响:一项经济评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q284. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
3
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.
4
Intensive care unit delirium is an independent predictor of longer hospital stay: a prospective analysis of 261 non-ventilated patients.重症监护病房谵妄是住院时间延长的独立预测因素:对261例非通气患者的前瞻性分析。
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R375-81. doi: 10.1186/cc3729. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
5
Sedation and analgesia practices in neonatal intensive care units (EUROPAIN): results from a prospective cohort study.新生儿重症监护病房镇静和镇痛实践(EUROPAIN):一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Oct;3(10):796-812. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00331-8. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
6
Protocolized intensive care unit management of analgesia, sedation, and delirium improves analgesia and subsyndromal delirium rates.规范化的重症加强护理病房镇痛、镇静和谵妄管理可提高镇痛和亚综合征性谵妄的发生率。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):451-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d7e1b8. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
7
Critical illness outcomes in specialty versus general intensive care units.专科重症监护病房与综合重症监护病房的危重病治疗结果。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr 15;179(8):676-83. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200808-1281OC. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
8
Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes.重症患者 ICU 重构前后,重症患者的院内死亡率、住院时间和可预防并发症。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2175-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.697. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.谵妄作为重症监护病房机械通气患者死亡率的预测指标。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753.
10
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study Between Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units vs. Mixed Intensive Care Units in Key Performance Indicators.医疗/外科重症监护病房与混合重症监护病房关键绩效指标的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74100. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Does adherence to a quality indicator regarding early weaning from invasive ventilation improve economic outcome? A single-centre retrospective study.遵守关于有创通气早期撤机的质量指标是否能改善经济结果?一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e045327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045327.
3
Current Perspectives on the Assessment and Management of Pain in the Intensive Care Unit.
重症监护病房疼痛评估与管理的当前观点
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 14;14:1733-1744. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256406. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study.疼痛、镇静和谵妄监测对临床和经济结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0234801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234801. eCollection 2020.
5
Chronic pain in critical care survivors: a narrative review.重症监护幸存者的慢性疼痛:叙事性综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e372-e384. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Pain Assessment in INTensive care (PAINT): an observational study of physician-documented pain assessment in 45 intensive care units in the United Kingdom.重症监护中的疼痛评估(PAINT):对英国 45 个重症监护病房中医生记录的疼痛评估的观察性研究。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):737-748. doi: 10.1111/anae.13786. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
7
Does the combination use of two pain assessment tools have a synergistic effect?两种疼痛评估工具联合使用是否具有协同效应?
J Intensive Care. 2017 Jan 3;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0195-7. eCollection 2017.
8
Clinical Practice Guideline of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征临床实践指南
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2016 Oct;79(4):214-233. doi: 10.4046/trd.2016.79.4.214. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version.重症医学中谵妄、镇痛与镇静管理的循证及共识指南。2015年修订版(DAS指南2015)-简版
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Nov 12;13:Doc19. doi: 10.3205/000223. eCollection 2015.
10
Voluntary peer review as innovative tool for quality improvement in the intensive care unit--a retrospective descriptive cohort study in German intensive care units.自愿同行评审作为重症监护病房质量改进的创新工具——德国重症监护病房的一项回顾性描述性队列研究
Ger Med Sci. 2014 Dec 15;12:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/000202. eCollection 2014.