• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人治疗法庭:对制定及资格认定州法规的全国性审查。

Veterans Treatment Courts: A Nationwide Review of Enacting and Eligibility State Statutes.

作者信息

Rapisarda Sabrina S, Kras Kimberly R, LeMoyne Grace, Hummer Don, Socia Kelly

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Lowell.

San Diego State University.

出版信息

Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):32-58. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2263451. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1080/15564886.2023.2263451
PMID:39713089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658118/
Abstract

Veterans treatment court (VTC) is the fastest growing type of treatment court in the United States with over 600 VTCs in operation today. Despite this recent proliferation, minimal scholarship has been conducted investigating how the state-level statutory landscape influences VTCs. The current study begins to address this gap by comprehensively reviewing and analyzing state legislation that governs the enactment, operation, and eligibility requirements of VTCs nationwide. Our initial search reveals that 70% of states currently operating VTCs are statutorily authorized at the state-level, of which nearly two-thirds also enumerates operational and eligibility criteria, such as military status and branch, mental health diagnosis, the "nexus", criminal history, military discharge status, offense severity and type, and more. Our analysis indicates considerable variation and nuance across states but coalesced into several unifying themes. The results provide insights on one of the many important powers involved in shaping the operational and eligibility elements of VTCs-state legislatures-and can serve as a catalyst for future research on the myriad factors involved in determining how we conceptualize VTCs and who is included in them.

摘要

退伍军人治疗法庭(VTC)是美国发展最快的治疗法庭类型,目前有600多个VTC在运作。尽管最近此类法庭大量增加,但针对州级法规环境如何影响VTC的学术研究却很少。本研究通过全面审查和分析管辖全国VTC的设立、运作和资格要求的州立法,开始填补这一空白。我们最初的搜索发现,目前运作VTC的州中有70%在州一级有法定授权,其中近三分之二还列举了运作和资格标准,如军事身份和军种、心理健康诊断、“关联”、犯罪历史、军事退伍状态、罪行严重程度和类型等。我们的分析表明,各州之间存在相当大的差异和细微差别,但可归纳为几个统一的主题。研究结果揭示了在塑造VTC的运作和资格要素方面众多重要权力之一——州立法机构——的情况,并可成为未来研究众多因素的催化剂,这些因素涉及我们如何界定VTC以及哪些人被纳入其中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/eba2435d152a/nihms-2039009-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/6733a24d0d35/nihms-2039009-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/a22111575ed9/nihms-2039009-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/73edefac5e48/nihms-2039009-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/eba2435d152a/nihms-2039009-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/6733a24d0d35/nihms-2039009-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/a22111575ed9/nihms-2039009-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/73edefac5e48/nihms-2039009-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/11658118/eba2435d152a/nihms-2039009-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Veterans Treatment Courts: A Nationwide Review of Enacting and Eligibility State Statutes.退伍军人治疗法庭:对制定及资格认定州法规的全国性审查。
Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):32-58. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2263451. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
A Longitudinal Examination of Veterans Treatment Courts' Characteristics and Eligibility Criteria.退伍军人治疗法庭的特征与资格标准的纵向考察
Justice Res Policy. 2016 Dec;17(2):123-136. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
No Veteran Left Behind? Perspectives on VTC Eligibility Criteria for Justice-Involved Veterans in Multiple Jurisdictions Across the United States.不让任何退伍军人掉队?关于美国多个司法管辖区中涉及司法事务的退伍军人的职业技术学院资格标准的观点。
Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):59-79. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2288963. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
"God, I hope it doesn't fade out": Team Member Perspectives on the Future of Veterans Treatment Courts.“天哪,我希望它不会消失”:团队成员对退伍军人治疗法庭未来的看法。
Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):119-136. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2276321. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Logic Model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Role in Veterans Treatment Courts.退伍军人事务部在退伍军人治疗法庭中所扮演角色的逻辑模型。
Drug Court Rev. 2019 Summer;2:45-62.
6
Veterans treatment courts: A case study of their efficacy for Veterans' needs.退伍军人治疗法庭:针对退伍军人需求的疗效案例研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Nov-Dec;49(Pt B):221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
7
New Research on Veterans Treatment Courts: An Overview of the .退伍军人治疗法庭的新研究:概述…… (原文似乎不完整)
Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):5-31. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2295882. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
8
Diversion of Veterans With Criminal Justice Involvement to Treatment Courts: Participant Characteristics and Outcomes.将有刑事司法介入经历的退伍军人转介至治疗法庭:参与者特征与结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Apr 1;68(4):375-383. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600233. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
Trauma-Informed Training for Veterans Treatment Court Professionals: Program Development and Initial Feedback.退伍军人治疗法庭专业人员的创伤知情培训:项目开发与初步反馈
Fed Pract. 2023 Feb;40(2):40-46. doi: 10.12788/fp.0358. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
A Qualitative Examination of the Experiences of Veterans Treatment Court Graduates in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县退伍军人治疗法庭毕业生经历的定性研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Feb;63(3):339-356. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18801462. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Logic Model of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Role in Veterans Treatment Courts.退伍军人事务部在退伍军人治疗法庭中所扮演角色的逻辑模型。
Drug Court Rev. 2019 Summer;2:45-62.
2
A scoping review of military veterans involved in the criminal justice system and their health and healthcare.对涉及刑事司法系统的退伍军人及其健康与医疗保健的范围综述。
Health Justice. 2019 Apr 8;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0086-9.
3
The Prevalence of Military Sexual Trauma: A Meta-Analysis.军事性创伤的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Dec;19(5):584-597. doi: 10.1177/1524838016683459. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
A Longitudinal Examination of Veterans Treatment Courts' Characteristics and Eligibility Criteria.退伍军人治疗法庭的特征与资格标准的纵向考察
Justice Res Policy. 2016 Dec;17(2):123-136. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
A National Study of Veterans Treatment Court Participants: Who Benefits and Who Recidivates.一项关于退伍军人治疗法庭参与者的全国性研究:谁从中受益以及谁再次犯罪。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Mar;45(2):236-244. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0816-z.
6
Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience.审视退伍军人治疗法庭的实施情况及初步绩效指标:肯塔基州的经验
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Aug;63:54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
Veterans treatment courts: A case study of their efficacy for Veterans' needs.退伍军人治疗法庭:针对退伍军人需求的疗效案例研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Nov-Dec;49(Pt B):221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.