Rapisarda Sabrina S, Kras Kimberly R, LeMoyne Grace, Hummer Don, Socia Kelly
University of Massachusetts Lowell.
San Diego State University.
Vict Offender. 2024;19(1):32-58. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2023.2263451. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
Veterans treatment court (VTC) is the fastest growing type of treatment court in the United States with over 600 VTCs in operation today. Despite this recent proliferation, minimal scholarship has been conducted investigating how the state-level statutory landscape influences VTCs. The current study begins to address this gap by comprehensively reviewing and analyzing state legislation that governs the enactment, operation, and eligibility requirements of VTCs nationwide. Our initial search reveals that 70% of states currently operating VTCs are statutorily authorized at the state-level, of which nearly two-thirds also enumerates operational and eligibility criteria, such as military status and branch, mental health diagnosis, the "nexus", criminal history, military discharge status, offense severity and type, and more. Our analysis indicates considerable variation and nuance across states but coalesced into several unifying themes. The results provide insights on one of the many important powers involved in shaping the operational and eligibility elements of VTCs-state legislatures-and can serve as a catalyst for future research on the myriad factors involved in determining how we conceptualize VTCs and who is included in them.
退伍军人治疗法庭(VTC)是美国发展最快的治疗法庭类型,目前有600多个VTC在运作。尽管最近此类法庭大量增加,但针对州级法规环境如何影响VTC的学术研究却很少。本研究通过全面审查和分析管辖全国VTC的设立、运作和资格要求的州立法,开始填补这一空白。我们最初的搜索发现,目前运作VTC的州中有70%在州一级有法定授权,其中近三分之二还列举了运作和资格标准,如军事身份和军种、心理健康诊断、“关联”、犯罪历史、军事退伍状态、罪行严重程度和类型等。我们的分析表明,各州之间存在相当大的差异和细微差别,但可归纳为几个统一的主题。研究结果揭示了在塑造VTC的运作和资格要素方面众多重要权力之一——州立法机构——的情况,并可成为未来研究众多因素的催化剂,这些因素涉及我们如何界定VTC以及哪些人被纳入其中。