Egbe Alexander C, Jain C Charles, Burchill Luke J, Karnakoti Snigdha, Ahmed Marwan H, Jokhadar Maan, Connolly Heidi M
From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2024 Feb 16;15:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100501. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Patients with palliated pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS) have less cardiac remodeling and symptoms as compared to patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) presenting with similar severity of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) disease. What is not known is whether patients with PVS versus TOF presenting with similar severity of RVOT disease at baseline, would have similar (or different) pace of cardiac remodeling and disease progression over time. The study objective was to compare temporal changes in clinical and cardiac function indices between adults with palliated PVS and repaired TOF presenting with moderate/severe RVOT disease.
Cardiac function indices (based on strain imaging) and clinical indices (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio [MELD-XI], peak oxygen consumption [VO]), were assessed at baseline, 3 years, and 5 years. Temporal changes were calculated as relative changes from baseline (Δ). Cardiovascular adverse event was assessed as time-to-event outcome.
Compared to TOF group (n = 173), the PVS group (n = 173) had less temporal change in right atrial reservoir strain (-9±4% versus -21 ± 6%, p < 0.001), RV free wall strain (-8±4% versus -20 ± 5%, p < 0.001), NT-proBNP (8 ± 5% versus 17 ± 6 %, p < 0.001), MELD-XI (6 ± 4% versus 19 ± 4%, p = 0.008), and peak VO (-7±3% versus -12 ± 7%, p < 0.001) at 5 years. The 5-year freedom from cardiovascular adverse event was higher in the PVS group (76% versus 54%, p = 0.01).
These data suggest that a less frequent clinical and imaging follow-up may be appropriate in patients with PVS (as compared to patients with TOF).
与患有相似严重程度右心室流出道(RVOT)疾病的法洛四联症(TOF)修复术后患者相比,姑息性肺动脉瓣狭窄(PVS)患者的心脏重塑和症状较轻。目前尚不清楚,基线时患有相似严重程度RVOT疾病的PVS患者与TOF患者,随着时间推移,其心脏重塑和疾病进展的速度是否相似(或不同)。本研究的目的是比较患有中度/重度RVOT疾病的姑息性PVS成人患者和TOF修复术后成人患者临床及心脏功能指标的时间变化。
在基线、3年和5年时评估心脏功能指标(基于应变成像)和临床指标(N末端B型利钠肽原[NT-proBNP]、排除国际标准化比值的终末期肝病模型[MELD-XI]、峰值耗氧量[VO])。时间变化计算为相对于基线的相对变化(Δ)。心血管不良事件评估为事件发生时间结局。
与TOF组(n = 173)相比,PVS组(n = 173)在5年时右心房储备应变的时间变化较小(-9±4%对-21±6%,p < 0.001)、右心室游离壁应变(-8±4%对-20±5%,p < 0.001)、NT-proBNP(8±5%对17±6%,p < 0.001)、MELD-XI(6±4%对1九±4%,p = 0.008)和峰值VO(-7±3%对-12±7%,p < 0.001)。PVS组5年无心血管不良事件的发生率更高(76%对54%,p = 0.01)。
这些数据表明,对于PVS患者(与TOF患者相比),可能适合进行不太频繁的临床和影像学随访。