Vidman Stephen, Ma Yee Hang Ethan, Fullenkamp Nolan, Plant Giles W
Department of Neuroscience, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Neural Regen Res. 2025 Nov 1;20(11):3063-3075. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00901. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
In recent years, the progression of stem cell therapies has shown great promise in advancing the nascent field of regenerative medicine. Considering the non-regenerative nature of the mature central nervous system, the concept that "blank" cells could be reprogrammed and functionally integrated into host neural networks remained intriguing. Previous work has also demonstrated the ability of such cells to stimulate intrinsic growth programs in post-mitotic cells, such as neurons. While embryonic stem cells demonstrated great potential in treating central nervous system pathologies, ethical and technical concerns remained. These barriers, along with the clear necessity for this type of treatment, ultimately prompted the advent of induced pluripotent stem cells. The advantage of pluripotent cells in central nervous system regeneration is multifaceted, permitting differentiation into neural stem cells, neural progenitor cells, glia, and various neuronal subpopulations. The precise spatiotemporal application of extrinsic growth factors in vitro, in addition to microenvironmental signaling in vivo, influences the efficiency of this directed differentiation. While the pluri- or multipotency of these cells is appealing, it also poses the risk of unregulated differentiation and teratoma formation. Cells of the neuroectodermal lineage, such as neuronal subpopulations and glia, have been explored with varying degrees of success. Although the risk of cancer or teratoma formation is greatly reduced, each subpopulation varies in effectiveness and is influenced by a myriad of factors, such as the timing of the transplant, pathology type, and the ratio of accompanying progenitor cells. Furthermore, successful transplantation requires innovative approaches to develop delivery vectors that can mitigate cell death and support integration. Lastly, host immune responses to allogeneic grafts must be thoroughly characterized and further developed to reduce the need for immunosuppression. Translation to a clinical setting will involve careful consideration when assessing both physiologic and functional outcomes. This review will highlight both successes and challenges faced when using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cell transplantation therapies to promote endogenous regeneration.
近年来,干细胞疗法的进展在推动再生医学这一新兴领域方面显示出了巨大的前景。鉴于成熟中枢神经系统的非再生特性,“空白”细胞能够被重编程并在功能上整合到宿主神经网络中的概念一直很吸引人。先前的研究还证明了这类细胞刺激有丝分裂后细胞(如神经元)内源性生长程序的能力。虽然胚胎干细胞在治疗中枢神经系统疾病方面显示出了巨大潜力,但伦理和技术问题依然存在。这些障碍,以及对这类治疗的明确需求,最终促使了诱导多能干细胞的出现。多能细胞在中枢神经系统再生中的优势是多方面的,它能够分化为神经干细胞、神经祖细胞、神经胶质细胞以及各种神经元亚群。除了体内微环境信号外,体外精确的时空应用外源性生长因子会影响这种定向分化的效率。虽然这些细胞的多能性或多潜能性很有吸引力,但也存在不受控制的分化和畸胎瘤形成的风险。神经外胚层谱系的细胞,如神经元亚群和神经胶质细胞,已经得到了不同程度的研究。虽然癌症或畸胎瘤形成的风险大大降低了,但每个亚群的效果各不相同,并且受到许多因素的影响,如移植时间、病理类型以及伴随祖细胞的比例。此外,成功的移植需要创新方法来开发能够减轻细胞死亡并支持整合的递送载体。最后,必须全面了解宿主对异体移植物的免疫反应并进一步加以改进,以减少免疫抑制的需求。在评估生理和功能结果时,向临床应用的转化需要仔细考虑。本综述将重点介绍使用人诱导多能干细胞衍生细胞移植疗法促进内源性再生时所面临的成功与挑战。