Drevitska Oksana O, Butska Lidiia V, Drevytskyi Ostap O, Ryzhak Valentyn O, Varina Hanna B, Kovalova Olha V, Medvid Inna V
EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC CENTER ≪INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE≫ OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV, KYIV, UKRAINE.
CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION OF TRANSLATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, KYIV, UKRAINE.
Wiad Lek. 2024;77(11):2148-2153. doi: 10.36740/WLek/197083.
Aim: To analyze and compare the experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) among practicing doctors and medical students.
Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted among 30 doctors and 30 fifth-year master's students enrolled in the "Medicine" program. Participants were asked about their experiences with AI, their perceptions of AI's impact on their education and practice, and their views on the benefits and drawbacks of AI in the medical field. The data were analyzed to compare the responses between the two groups.
Results: Among the respondents, 8 doctors (26,67%) and 4 students (13,33%) had not used AI in their practice or studies. The analysis was conducted on the remaining 22 doctors and 26 students. The study found that students generally rated the effectiveness of AI higher than physicians did, particularly in areas such as enhancing work and educational experiences. Both groups used AI primarily for information retrieval, with students showing a slightly greater openness to expanding AI's role in education and practice. Despite recognizing the advantages of AI, both groups expressed concerns regarding its accuracy and reliability.
Conclusions: The study indicates that while AI, particularly ChatGPT, is increasingly being adopted in medical education and practice, there is still a level of caution and skepticism among both students and professionals. Further research is needed to optimize the integration of AI in medical curricula and address the ethical implications of its use.
旨在分析和比较执业医生和医学生对人工智能（AI）的体验和看法。
对30名医生和30名就读于“医学”专业的五年级硕士生进行了一项调查。参与者被问及他们使用AI的经历、对AI对其教育和实践影响的看法，以及他们对AI在医学领域的利弊的看法。对数据进行分析以比较两组的回答。
在受访者中，8名医生（26.67%）和4名学生（13.33%）在实践或学习中未使用过AI。对其余22名医生和26名学生进行了分析。研究发现，学生对AI有效性的评价普遍高于医生，特别是在提升工作和教育体验等方面。两组主要将AI用于信息检索，学生对扩大AI在教育和实践中的作用表现出略高的开放性。尽管认识到AI的优势，但两组都对其准确性和可靠性表示担忧。
该研究表明，虽然AI，尤其是ChatGPT，在医学教育和实践中的应用越来越广泛，但学生和专业人士中仍存在一定程度的谨慎和怀疑态度。需要进一步研究以优化AI在医学课程中的整合，并解决其使用的伦理问题。
