Li Chao, Kadeerhan Gaohaer, Zhang Tongtong, Yeerjiang Zaiwuli, Yang Yikun, Meng Jun, Wang Dongwen
Pharmacy Department.
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Int J Surg. 2025 Feb 1;111(2):2216-2226. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002183.
Pathologic complete response (pCR) is deemed to associate with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), however, whether it is suitable to serve as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival in clinical trials of neo-adjuvant treatment for resectable NSCLC trials is still controversy. We aim to evaluate the role of pCR and its viability as a surrogate endpoint for EFS and OS in NSCLC.
To investigate the association of pCR and EFS and OS, we performed a meta-analysis involving randomized clinical trials that have reported complete information on pCR rates with hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS. A standard meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between pCR rates and EFS and OS. Additionally, weighted regression analysis was performed to assess the associations between log relative risk (RR) for pCR and log HRs for EFS and OS, with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) being used to quantify the correlations. Furthermore, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) was also used to evaluate the minimum value of the RR for pCR necessary to confidently predict a non-null effect on HRs for EFS and OS.
The meta-analysis included 14 randomized clinical trials. The high pCR rate group had significant improvement of EFS (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.55-0.86) and OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72-0.94). A strong association was found between log RR for pCR and log HR for EFS (R 2 = 0.76; 95%CI 0.48-1.00) and a moderate correlation between log RR for pCR and log HR for OS (R 2 = 0.54; 95%CI 0.04-1.00). The STEs for pCR were 4.534 and 10.278 for EFS and OS, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, similar results were only observed in a partial set of comparisons.
A high pCR rate was associated with a long-term survival outcome. Strong association and moderate association were found between pCR and EFS, pCR and OS, respectively, which supports the application of pCR as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival in RCTs for resectable NSCLC.
病理完全缓解(pCR)被认为与无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)相关,然而,在可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)新辅助治疗的临床试验中,它是否适合作为长期生存的替代终点仍存在争议。我们旨在评估pCR在NSCLC中作为EFS和OS替代终点的作用及其可行性。
为了研究pCR与EFS和OS之间的关联,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,纳入了已报告pCR率以及EFS和OS风险比(HR)完整信息的随机临床试验。进行标准荟萃分析以确定pCR率与EFS和OS之间的关系。此外,进行加权回归分析以评估pCR的对数相对风险(RR)与EFS和OS的对数HR之间的关联,使用决定系数(R²)来量化相关性。此外,还使用替代阈值效应(STE)来评估pCR的RR的最小值,以自信地预测对EFS和OS的HR有非零效应。
荟萃分析纳入了14项随机临床试验。高pCR率组的EFS(HR = 0.69,95%CI 0.55 - 0.86)和OS(HR = 0.82,95%CI 0.72 - 0.94)有显著改善。发现pCR的对数RR与EFS的对数HR之间有强关联(R² = 0.76;95%CI 0.48 - 1.00),pCR的对数RR与OS的对数HR之间有中度关联(R² = 0.54;95%CI 0.04 - 1.00)。pCR对于EFS和OS的STE分别为4.534和10.278。在亚组分析中,仅在部分比较中观察到类似结果。
高pCR率与长期生存结果相关。分别在pCR与EFS、pCR与OS之间发现了强关联和中度关联,这支持将pCR作为可切除NSCLC随机对照试验中长期生存的替代终点。