Melin J A, Wijns W, Vanbutsele R J, Robert A, De Coster P, Brasseur L A, Beckers C, Detry J M
Circulation. 1985 Mar;71(3):535-42. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.3.535.
Alternative strategies using conditional probability analysis for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined in 93 infarct-free women presenting with chest pain. Another group of 42 consecutive female patients was prospectively analyzed. For this latter group, the physician had access to the pretest and posttest probability of CAD before coronary angiography. These 135 women all underwent stress electrocardiographic, thallium scintigraphic, and coronary angiographic examination. The pretest and posttest probabilities of coronary disease were derived from a computerized Bayesian algorithm. Probability estimates were calculated by the four following hypothetical strategies: SO, in which history, including risk factors, was considered; S1, in which history and stress electrocardiographic results were considered; S2, in which history and stress electrocardiographic and stress thallium scintigraphic results were considered; and S3, in which history and stress electrocardiographic results were used, but in which stress scintigraphic results were considered only if the poststress probability of CAD was between 10% and 90%, i.e., if a sufficient level of diagnostic certainty could not be obtained with the electrocardiographic results alone. The strategies were compared with respect to accuracy with the coronary angiogram as the standard. For both groups of women, S2 and S3 were found to be the most accurate in predicting the presence or absence of coronary disease (p less than .05). However, it was found with use of S3 that more than one-third of the thallium scintigrams could have been avoided without loss of accuracy. It was also found that diagnostic catheterization performed to exclude CAD as a diagnosis could have been avoided in half of the patients without loss of accuracy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对93例无梗死的胸痛女性患者采用条件概率分析诊断冠心病(CAD)的替代策略进行了研究。前瞻性分析了另一组42例连续的女性患者。对于后一组患者,医生在冠状动脉造影前可获得CAD的检验前概率和检验后概率。这135名女性均接受了运动心电图、铊闪烁扫描和冠状动脉造影检查。冠心病的检验前概率和检验后概率由计算机化的贝叶斯算法得出。概率估计通过以下四种假设策略计算:SO,考虑包括危险因素在内的病史;S1,考虑病史和运动心电图结果;S2,考虑病史、运动心电图结果和运动铊闪烁扫描结果;S3,考虑病史和运动心电图结果,但仅当CAD的应激后概率在10%至90%之间时,即仅当仅靠心电图结果无法获得足够的诊断确定性时,才考虑应激闪烁扫描结果。以冠状动脉造影为标准,比较了这些策略的准确性。对于两组女性,发现S2和S3在预测冠心病的存在与否方面最准确(p小于0.05)。然而,发现使用S3时,超过三分之一的铊闪烁扫描可以避免,而不会损失准确性。还发现,在一半的患者中可以避免为排除CAD诊断而进行的诊断性导管插入术,而不会损失准确性。(摘要截短于250字)