Robinaugh Donald J, Haslbeck Jonas M B, Waldorp Lourens J, Kossakowski Jolanda J, Fried Eiko I, Millner Alexander J, McNally Richard J, Ryan Oisín, de Ron Jill, van der Maas Han L J, van Nes Egbert H, Scheffer Marten, Kendler Kenneth S, Borsboom Denny
Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University.
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University.
Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov;131(6):1482-1508. doi: 10.1037/rev0000515.
The network theory of psychopathology posits that mental disorders are systems of mutually reinforcing symptoms. This framework has proven highly generative but does not specify precisely how any specific mental disorder operates as such a system. Cognitive behavioral theories of mental disorders provide considerable insight into how these systems may operate. However, the development of cognitive behavioral theories has itself been stagnant in recent years. In this article, we advance both theoretical frameworks by developing a network theory of panic disorder rooted in cognitive behavioral theory and formalized as a computational model. We use this computational model to evaluate the theory's ability to explain five fundamental panic disorder-related phenomena. Our results demonstrate that the network theory of panic disorder can explain core panic disorder phenomena. In addition, by formalizing this theory as a computational model and using the model to evaluate the theory's implications, we reveal gaps in the empirical literature and shortcomings in theories of panic disorder. We use these limitations to develop a novel, theory-driven agenda for panic disorder research. This agenda departs from current research practices and places its focus on (a) addressing areas in need of more rigorous descriptive research, (b) investigating novel phenomena predicted by the computational model, and (c) ongoing collaborative development of formal theories of panic disorder, with explanation as a central criterion for theory evaluation. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for research investigating mental disorders as complex systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
精神病理学的网络理论认为,精神障碍是相互强化的症状系统。这一框架已被证明具有高度的生成性,但并未精确说明任何特定的精神障碍是如何作为这样一个系统运作的。精神障碍的认知行为理论为这些系统可能如何运作提供了相当多的见解。然而,近年来认知行为理论的发展本身一直停滞不前。在本文中,我们通过开发一种基于认知行为理论并形式化为计算模型的惊恐障碍网络理论,推进了这两个理论框架。我们使用这个计算模型来评估该理论解释与惊恐障碍相关的五个基本现象的能力。我们的结果表明,惊恐障碍网络理论可以解释惊恐障碍的核心现象。此外,通过将该理论形式化为计算模型并使用该模型来评估该理论的影响,我们揭示了实证文献中的差距以及惊恐障碍理论中的缺陷。我们利用这些局限性为惊恐障碍研究制定了一个新颖的、理论驱动的议程。这个议程与当前的研究实践不同,它将重点放在:(a)解决需要更严格描述性研究的领域;(b)研究计算模型预测的新现象;(c)持续合作开发惊恐障碍的形式理论,并将解释作为理论评估的核心标准。我们最后讨论了这项工作对将精神障碍作为复杂系统进行研究的意义。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)