Mansueto Serafino Paolo, Romeo Zaira, Angrilli Alessandro, Spironelli Chiara
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy; Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council (CNR), via Gallucci 16, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Neuroimage. 2025 Jan;305:120986. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120986. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
The impacting research on emotions of the last decades was carried out with different methods. The most popular was based on the use of a validated sample of slides, the International Affective Pictures System (IAPS), divided mainly into pleasant, neutral and unpleasant categories, and on fMRI as a measure of brain activation induced by these stimuli. With the present coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) based on ALE approach, we aimed to unmask the main brain networks involved in the contrast of pleasant vs. neutral and unpleasant vs. neutral IAPS slide categories. Furthermore, we included studies employing both IAPS and non-IAPS (but analogously validated) pictures, a condition termed as IAPS EXTENDED. After selecting 97 papers published in the 2000-2023 interval, the planned contrasts were analyzed by also considering their interaction with the Load factor of the concomitant task, which comprised the conditions: No Load (passive viewing), Low-Load tasks and High-Load tasks. We analyzed a total of 152 experiments (106 focusing on the negative vs. neutral contrast; 46 reporting positive vs. neutral contrasts). We additionally performed conjunction and contrast analyses. Results confirmed outcomes of past meta-analyses on the involvement of a number of cortical and subcortical paralimbic and limbic regions during unpleasant picture processing, but the increase of the pubblications on this topic in last years, together with a more fine-grained analysis, allowed us to find also the involvement of additional areas, such as the right middle frontal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 9), posterior cingulate, and left inferior parietal lobule. Concerning passive viewing and low-load tasks, a clear frontal asymmetry emerged with greater right prefrontal activation (BA9) to unpleasant vs. pleasant pictures, whereas, during No Load tasks only, left frontal dominance to pleasant vs. unpleasant stimuli was found (BA13). The unpleasant vs. neutral comparison on High-Load tasks (the pleasant condition had an insufficient sample size) revealed a specific lateralization of several areas of the right hemisphere (STG-BA 38, MFG-BA 46, FG-BA 37), whereas, in the other load conditions, the inferior frontal gyrus was right lateralized, but the main activated regions were bilateral or left lateralized. Results are discussed considering the effects of both valence and task/load variables, and the involvement of hippocampus/amygdala, hemispheric asymmetries of emotions, the occipito-temporal areas, several sub-regions of the prefrontal/orbitofrontal cortex, and an extended motor network.
过去几十年间,针对情绪的影响性研究采用了不同方法。最流行的方法是使用经过验证的幻灯片样本,即国际情感图片系统(IAPS),主要分为愉悦、中性和不悦三类,并使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来测量这些刺激引发的大脑激活情况。通过基于ALE方法的当前坐标元分析(CBMA),我们旨在揭示参与愉悦与中性以及不悦与中性IAPS幻灯片类别对比的主要脑网络。此外,我们纳入了同时使用IAPS和非IAPS(但经过类似验证)图片的研究,这种情况被称为IAPS扩展版。在筛选出2000年至2023年间发表的97篇论文后,我们通过考虑它们与伴随任务的负荷因子之间的相互作用,对计划好的对比进行了分析,伴随任务的条件包括:无负荷(被动观看)、低负荷任务和高负荷任务。我们总共分析了152项实验(106项聚焦于负面与中性对比;46项报告了正面与中性对比)。我们还进行了联合分析和对比分析。结果证实了过去元分析关于在处理不悦图片期间多个皮质和皮质下边缘旁和边缘区域参与情况的结果,但近年来该主题出版物数量的增加,以及更精细的分析,使我们还发现了其他区域的参与情况,如右侧额中回、左侧额下回(BA 9)、后扣带回和左侧顶下小叶。关于被动观看和低负荷任务,出现了明显的额叶不对称,与愉悦图片相比,右侧前额叶(BA9)对不悦图片的激活更强,而仅在无负荷任务期间,发现左侧额叶对愉悦与不悦刺激占优势(BA13)。高负荷任务下的不悦与中性对比(愉悦条件的样本量不足)揭示了右半球几个区域(颞上回 - BA 38、额中回 - BA 46、梭状回 - BA 37)的特定偏侧化,而在其他负荷条件下,额下回向右偏侧化,但主要激活区域是双侧或向左偏侧化。我们结合效价和任务/负荷变量的影响、海马体/杏仁核的参与情况、情绪的半球不对称性、枕颞区、前额叶/眶额叶皮质的几个子区域以及扩展的运动网络对结果进行了讨论。