Schumacher G E
Clin Pharm. 1985 Jan-Feb;4(1):84-92.
Recent advances linking pharmacokinetic theory with the selection of optimal sampling times and the influence of sampling times on the interpretation of serum drug concentrations are discussed. For serum drug assay results to be interpreted easily, samples should be obtained during the postdistributive phase (for loading and maintenance doses) or at steady state (for maintenance doses). Beyond this, the choice of sampling times depends on whether peak, trough, or intermediate concentrations are being monitored. When intrapatient and interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic values are considered to be the principal components of variability, the best time for taking a single sample after a test dose in order to predict the average concentration during the steady-state dosage interval is when sample time equals 1.4 times the population half-life of the drug. Optimal sampling times to predict maximum or minimum steady-state concentrations may differ from those used to estimate the average concentration. Efforts to decrease the number of samples needed to estimate accurately steady-state drug concentrations have led investigators to test "single-point" prediction methods following a test dose. However, for drugs administered by continuous infusion, it seems prudent to assay more than one serum sample obtained before steady state is achieved; a single sample obtained too early could contribute to inaccurate predictions. Recommendations are presented for optimal sampling times for commonly monitored drugs.
本文讨论了药代动力学理论与最佳采样时间选择之间的最新进展,以及采样时间对血清药物浓度解释的影响。为了便于解释血清药物检测结果,样本应在分布后阶段(用于负荷剂量和维持剂量)或稳态时(用于维持剂量)采集。除此之外,采样时间的选择取决于监测的是峰值、谷值还是中间浓度。当药代动力学值的患者内和患者间变异被视为变异性的主要组成部分时,在给予试验剂量后采集单个样本以预测稳态给药间隔期间的平均浓度的最佳时间是采样时间等于药物总体半衰期的1.4倍时。预测最大或最小稳态浓度的最佳采样时间可能与用于估计平均浓度的时间不同。为减少准确估计稳态药物浓度所需的样本数量所做的努力,促使研究人员在给予试验剂量后测试“单点”预测方法。然而,对于持续输注给药的药物,在达到稳态之前检测多个血清样本似乎更为谨慎;过早采集的单个样本可能导致预测不准确。文中给出了常见监测药物的最佳采样时间建议。