Balzen Kennedy M, Sharp Carla, Unzurruzaga Erne, Eguren Ane, Pérez Luis
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, United States.
Hirube Cooperative Organization. Council of Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2024 Dec 21;12(1):20240012. doi: 10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0012. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Given shifts to dimensional models of personality pathology and a growing consensus that personality disorder (PD) often onsets during adolescence, there is a need for validated measures of PD in adolescents. Level of Personality Functioning (LPF) is particularly relevant for the identification of emerging personality dysfunction in adolescents given its ability to capture developmental discontinuity as metacognitive capacities in self- and interpersonal-functioning emerge. However, no studies as of yet have validated a measure of LPF in a sample of Spanish-speaking adolescents. In addition, no study has evaluated whether LPF associates with status as victim of parental neglect vs. community adolescents. A total of 570 Spanish-speaking adolescents between the ages of 11 and 18 ( = 168 with a history of parental neglect, = 402 from a community sample) completed the briefest form of LPF, the LPFS-BF 2.0. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis revealed adequate fit of a unidimensional model, and invariance analyses suggested measurement invariance across gender and age (early versus late adolescents). Internal consistency was adequate, and convergent validity was supported through negative correlations of the LPFS-BF 2.0 with empathy and reflective function, and positive associations with alexithymia. Contrary to expectations, total scores on the LPFS-BF 2.0 did not distinguish adolescents with a history of parental neglect and adolescents from a community sample. Overall, results support the Spanish translation of the LPFS-BF 2.0 as a valid measure for use in adolescents.
鉴于人格病理学向维度模型的转变,以及越来越多的人达成共识,即人格障碍(PD)通常在青春期发病,因此需要对青少年的PD进行有效测量。鉴于人格功能水平(LPF)能够捕捉自我和人际功能中的元认知能力出现时的发展不连续性,它对于识别青少年中正在出现的人格功能障碍尤为相关。然而,截至目前,尚无研究在讲西班牙语的青少年样本中验证LPF的测量方法。此外,也没有研究评估LPF是否与遭受父母忽视的青少年与社区青少年的状况相关。共有570名年龄在11至18岁之间的讲西班牙语的青少年(其中168名有父母忽视史,402名来自社区样本)完成了LPF的最简形式,即LPFS-BF 2.0。验证性因素分析的结果显示一维模型拟合良好,不变性分析表明在性别和年龄(早期与晚期青少年)上具有测量不变性。内部一致性良好,LPFS-BF 2.0与同理心和反思功能的负相关以及与述情障碍的正相关支持了收敛效度。与预期相反,LPFS-BF 2.0的总分未能区分有父母忽视史的青少年和社区样本中的青少年。总体而言,结果支持将LPFS-BF 2.0的西班牙语翻译版本作为用于青少年的有效测量方法。