Suppr超能文献

人格功能水平量表简版2.0:中文版的效度与信度

Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.

作者信息

Ma Dandan, Dai Bindong, Wang Yufei, Cao Jinya, Wei Jing

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, the concept of personality functioning (self-functioning and interpersonal functioning) is officially introduced as the core feature for diagnosing personality disorder. The current study investigated the psychometric characteristics of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Chinese.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. We recruited psychiatric outpatients in China to test the reliability, structural and convergent validity of the LPFS-BF 2.0. The sample was randomly split half to perform exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) was used to examine the convergent validity.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients (35.84 ± 9.48 years) completed questionnaires in valid forms, of which 147 (66.8%) participants were female. The average score of the LPFS-BF 2.0 scale was 25.36 ± 7.95 (full score = 48). The Hull method supported the unidimensional structure of LPFS-BF2.0 (UniCo = 0.98, ECV = 0.85, and MIREAL = 0.28). The CFA indicated a more excellent fit for the two-factor model (χ2/df = 1.81, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04, CFI = 0.96). The LPFS-BF 2.0 and both subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83∼0.90) and significant correlation with PID-5-BF (r = 0.28∼0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of LPFS-BF 2.0 scales is a valid and reliable rating scale to measure personality functioning among Chinese patients.

摘要

背景

在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-5和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)-11中,人格功能(自我功能和人际功能)的概念被正式引入作为诊断人格障碍的核心特征。本研究调查了中文版人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)的心理测量学特征。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。我们招募了中国的精神科门诊患者来测试LPFS-BF 2.0的信度、结构效度和收敛效度。样本被随机分成两半进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》-5简版人格问卷(PID-5-BF)来检验收敛效度。

结果

共有441名患者(35.84±9.48岁)以有效形式完成了问卷,其中147名(66.8%)参与者为女性。LPFS-BF 2.0量表的平均得分为25.36±7.95(满分=48)。赫尔方法支持LPFS-BF2.0的单维结构(UniCo=0.98,ECV=0.85,MIREAL=0.28)。CFA表明两因素模型的拟合度更好(χ2/df=1.81,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.04,CFI=0.96)。LPFS-BF 2.0及其两个子量表均显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.83∼0.90),并与PID-5-BF显著相关(r=0.28∼0.66)。

结论

中文版LPFS-BF 2.0量表是测量中国患者人格功能的有效且可靠的评定量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6787/12219978/dc41c3e89c10/12888_2025_7081_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS-SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.
Personal Ment Health. 2025;19(3):e70028. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70028.
4
Validation of the uncertainty stress scale-high-risk pregnancy - Chinese brief version: Rasch analysis.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07078-7.
9
Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi).
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2511373. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 among older adults.
Personal Disord. 2021 Nov;12(6):526-533. doi: 10.1037/per0000413. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

3
An Updated Validation of Persian Versions of Six Personality Questionnaires: TEMPS-A, AFECTS, TCI, PANAS, NEO-FFI, PDQ-4.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9:02537176241276741. doi: 10.1177/02537176241276741.
4
Research on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Iran: A Narrative Literature Review.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 10:02537176241281888. doi: 10.1177/02537176241281888.
5
Progress in understanding personality functioning in light of the DSM-5 and ICD-11.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 Dec;102:104259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104259. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
6
CD4 T-cell subsets are associated with chronic stress effects in newly diagnosed anxiety disorders.
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Jul 3;31:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100661. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.
Personal Disord. 2024 Nov;15(6):492-503. doi: 10.1037/per0000674. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
ICD-11 personality disorder features in the danish general population: Cut-offs and prevalence rates for severity levels.
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115484. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115484. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
10
Differentiation of Self and Interpersonal Functioning with the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0.
J Pers Assess. 2024 Jan-Feb;106(1):60-71. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2218931. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验