• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格功能水平量表简版2.0:中文版的效度与信度

Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.

作者信息

Ma Dandan, Dai Bindong, Wang Yufei, Cao Jinya, Wei Jing

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y
PMID:40598045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12219978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, the concept of personality functioning (self-functioning and interpersonal functioning) is officially introduced as the core feature for diagnosing personality disorder. The current study investigated the psychometric characteristics of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Chinese.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. We recruited psychiatric outpatients in China to test the reliability, structural and convergent validity of the LPFS-BF 2.0. The sample was randomly split half to perform exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) was used to examine the convergent validity.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients (35.84 ± 9.48 years) completed questionnaires in valid forms, of which 147 (66.8%) participants were female. The average score of the LPFS-BF 2.0 scale was 25.36 ± 7.95 (full score = 48). The Hull method supported the unidimensional structure of LPFS-BF2.0 (UniCo = 0.98, ECV = 0.85, and MIREAL = 0.28). The CFA indicated a more excellent fit for the two-factor model (χ2/df = 1.81, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04, CFI = 0.96). The LPFS-BF 2.0 and both subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83∼0.90) and significant correlation with PID-5-BF (r = 0.28∼0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of LPFS-BF 2.0 scales is a valid and reliable rating scale to measure personality functioning among Chinese patients.

摘要

背景

在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-5和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)-11中,人格功能(自我功能和人际功能)的概念被正式引入作为诊断人格障碍的核心特征。本研究调查了中文版人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)的心理测量学特征。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。我们招募了中国的精神科门诊患者来测试LPFS-BF 2.0的信度、结构效度和收敛效度。样本被随机分成两半进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》-5简版人格问卷(PID-5-BF)来检验收敛效度。

结果

共有441名患者(35.84±9.48岁)以有效形式完成了问卷,其中147名(66.8%)参与者为女性。LPFS-BF 2.0量表的平均得分为25.36±7.95(满分=48)。赫尔方法支持LPFS-BF2.0的单维结构(UniCo=0.98,ECV=0.85,MIREAL=0.28)。CFA表明两因素模型的拟合度更好(χ2/df=1.81,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.04,CFI=0.96)。LPFS-BF 2.0及其两个子量表均显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.83∼0.90),并与PID-5-BF显著相关(r=0.28∼0.66)。

结论

中文版LPFS-BF 2.0量表是测量中国患者人格功能的有效且可靠的评定量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6787/12219978/dc41c3e89c10/12888_2025_7081_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6787/12219978/dc41c3e89c10/12888_2025_7081_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6787/12219978/dc41c3e89c10/12888_2025_7081_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.人格功能水平量表简版2.0:中文版的效度与信度
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS-SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.拉脱维亚LPFS-SR在临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性。
Personal Ment Health. 2025;19(3):e70028. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70028.
3
Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2) in Germany: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in an Online and Outpatient Sample.德国修订版自杀危机量表(SCI - 2)的心理测量学评估:在线及门诊样本中的因子结构、信度和效度
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70106. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70106.
4
Validation of the uncertainty stress scale-high-risk pregnancy - Chinese brief version: Rasch analysis.不确定性应激量表-高危妊娠中文版的验证:拉施分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07078-7.
5
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
6
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF).用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格功能水平量表(LPFS)的简短自评问卷的编制与初步心理测量学评估:LPFS简表(LPFS-BF)
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000159. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
[The German Version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF): Latent Structure, Convergent Validity and Norm Values in the General Population].[人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF)德文版:一般人群中的潜在结构、收敛效度和常模值]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 Jul;71(7):284-293. doi: 10.1055/a-1343-2396. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning.人格功能水平量表-简式 2.0:评估人格功能水平的简短工具的更新。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):3-14. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1434. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi).《用于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中持续性悲伤障碍的奥胡斯结构化临床访谈(A-PGDi)的开发与验证》
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2511373. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 among older adults.人格功能水平量表-简式 2.0 在中国老年人中的心理测量评估。
Personal Disord. 2021 Nov;12(6):526-533. doi: 10.1037/per0000413. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Severity Benchmarks for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Polish Adults.波兰成年人个性功能量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)水平的严重程度基准。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;13(3):340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030340.
2
The Spanish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0): Psychometric evaluation in adolescents who have suffered from parental abuse and neglect and a community sample.人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)的西班牙语版本:对遭受父母虐待和忽视的青少年及社区样本的心理测量评估。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2024 Dec 21;12(1):20240012. doi: 10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0012. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
An Updated Validation of Persian Versions of Six Personality Questionnaires: TEMPS-A, AFECTS, TCI, PANAS, NEO-FFI, PDQ-4.
六种人格问卷波斯语版本的更新验证:TEMPS-A、AFECTS、TCI、PANAS、NEO-FFI、PDQ-4
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9:02537176241276741. doi: 10.1177/02537176241276741.
4
Research on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Iran: A Narrative Literature Review.伊朗人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)研究:叙事性文献综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 10:02537176241281888. doi: 10.1177/02537176241281888.
5
Progress in understanding personality functioning in light of the DSM-5 and ICD-11.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)和《国际疾病分类》第十一版(ICD-11)对人格功能理解的进展。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 Dec;102:104259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104259. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
6
CD4 T-cell subsets are associated with chronic stress effects in newly diagnosed anxiety disorders.CD4 T细胞亚群与新诊断焦虑症中的慢性应激效应相关。
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Jul 3;31:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100661. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.青少年人格功能评定量表-简短版 2.0 的首次心理计量学评估。
Personal Disord. 2024 Nov;15(6):492-503. doi: 10.1037/per0000674. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
ICD-11 personality disorder features in the danish general population: Cut-offs and prevalence rates for severity levels.《丹麦普通人群中的 ICD-11 人格障碍特征:严重程度的截断值和患病率》
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115484. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115484. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
9
Characterization of different types of anxiety disorders in relation to structural integration of personality and adverse and protective childhood experiences in psychotherapy outpatients - a cross-sectional study.探讨心理治疗门诊患者中不同类型焦虑障碍与人格结构整合以及不良和保护童年经历的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04988-2.
10
Differentiation of Self and Interpersonal Functioning with the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0.用人格功能水平量表-简式 2.0 区分自我和人际功能。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Jan-Feb;106(1):60-71. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2218931. Epub 2023 Jun 12.