• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肉牛屠宰时胃肠道黏膜微生物群的生物地理学

The biogeography of gastrointestinal mucosal microbiota of beef cattle at harvest.

作者信息

Young J Daniel, Pinnell Lee J, Wolfe Cory A, Doster Enrique, Valeris-Chacin Robert, Lawrence Ty E, Richeson John T, Morley Paul S

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.

VERO Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 9;15:1490882. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1490882. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1490882
PMID:39717274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11663860/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The gastrointestinal microbiota profoundly influences the health and productivity of animals. This study aimed to characterize microbial community structures of the mouth, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and feces of cattle.

METHODS

Samples were collected from 18 Akaushi crossbred steers at harvest from multiple locations, including the oral cavity, rumen, abomasum, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, spiral colon, distal colon, and feces. These cattle were raised without exposure to antimicrobial drugs or hormone implants. Total microbial abundance was assessed using qPCR targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, and microbial community composition was evaluated through 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

RESULTS

Total microbial abundance was lesser in the small intestine than in other GIT regions ( ≤ 0.05). Additionally, microbial communities in the small intestine had lower richness and diversity than other regions ( ≤ 0.05). Microbial community compositions were measurably different along the GIT, with greater relatedness in adjacent GIT sections when progressing from oral to aboral locations. Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla in all samples. However, variations in composition were evident at lower taxonomic levels within these dominant phyla among samples from different regions. Genera previously associated with healthy gut microbiome communities were observed in low abundance across GIT regions. Taxa historically associated with liver abscesses (e.g., and ) were detected in low abundance (≤0.02% relative abundance) throughout the GIT. In contrast, , which recently has been identified as a dominant feature in many liver abscesses, was observed in greater relative abundance (5.2% on average) in the hindgut.

DISCUSSION

This study provides an in-depth evaluation of the GIT of harvest-ready Akaushi crossbred cattle of varying growth rates. Clear differences exist in the abundance and composition of microbial populations at different points of the GIT. Unfortunately, no single GIT location can adequately represent the microbial communities of the entire GIT, which has important implications for future research. Additionally, examining microbiome data only at the phylum level likely oversimplifies important complexities of the microbial community structures, and investigations of lower taxonomic ranks should be included.

摘要

引言

胃肠道微生物群对动物的健康和生产力有深远影响。本研究旨在描述牛口腔、胃肠道(GIT)和粪便的微生物群落结构。

方法

从18头赤牛杂交阉牛屠宰时的多个部位采集样本,包括口腔、瘤胃、皱胃、十二指肠、空肠、回肠、盲肠、螺旋结肠、远端结肠和粪便。这些牛在饲养过程中未接触过抗菌药物或激素植入物。使用靶向16S rRNA基因V3-V4区域的qPCR评估总微生物丰度,并通过16S rRNA基因测序评估微生物群落组成。

结果

小肠中的总微生物丰度低于其他GIT区域(≤0.05)。此外,小肠中的微生物群落丰富度和多样性低于其他区域(≤0.05)。沿GIT的微生物群落组成存在显著差异,从口腔到肛门位置,相邻GIT节段的相关性更高。厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门和放线菌门是所有样本中的优势菌门。然而,在这些优势菌门中,来自不同区域的样本在较低分类水平上的组成差异明显。在整个GIT区域中,先前与健康肠道微生物群落相关的属的丰度较低。历史上与肝脓肿相关的分类群(如 和 )在整个GIT中的丰度较低(相对丰度≤0.02%)。相比之下,最近在许多肝脓肿中被确定为主要特征的 在后肠中的相对丰度更高(平均为5.2%)。

讨论

本研究对不同生长速度的即将屠宰的赤牛杂交牛的GIT进行了深入评估。GIT不同部位的微生物种群丰度和组成存在明显差异。不幸的是,没有一个单一的GIT位置能够充分代表整个GIT的微生物群落,这对未来的研究具有重要意义。此外,仅在门水平上检查微生物组数据可能会过度简化微生物群落结构的重要复杂性,并应包括对较低分类等级的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/b514377c5025/fmicb-15-1490882-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/b975ce917d01/fmicb-15-1490882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/cf035dcf534d/fmicb-15-1490882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/6a0f281dbd23/fmicb-15-1490882-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/145fdb553364/fmicb-15-1490882-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/3906587463eb/fmicb-15-1490882-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/b514377c5025/fmicb-15-1490882-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/b975ce917d01/fmicb-15-1490882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/cf035dcf534d/fmicb-15-1490882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/6a0f281dbd23/fmicb-15-1490882-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/145fdb553364/fmicb-15-1490882-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/3906587463eb/fmicb-15-1490882-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a50a/11663860/b514377c5025/fmicb-15-1490882-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The biogeography of gastrointestinal mucosal microbiota of beef cattle at harvest.肉牛屠宰时胃肠道黏膜微生物群的生物地理学
Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 9;15:1490882. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1490882. eCollection 2024.
2
The gastrointestinal tract microbiome of Holstein × Angus cross cattle is negatively impacted by the pre-harvest process.荷斯坦×安格斯杂交牛的胃肠道微生物群在收获前的过程中受到负面影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 May 21;91(5):e0259924. doi: 10.1128/aem.02599-24. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Liver abscess microbiota of feedlot steers finished in natural and traditional management programs.育肥场牛在自然和传统管理方案下的肝脓肿微生物群。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Nov 1;100(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac252.
4
Characterization of the Microbial Communities along the Gastrointestinal Tract in Crossbred Cattle.杂交牛胃肠道微生物群落特征分析
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;12(7):825. doi: 10.3390/ani12070825.
5
Bacterial Community Dynamics across the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Dairy Calves during Preweaning Development.在犊牛断奶前的发育过程中,奶牛胃肠道中的细菌群落动态。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Apr 16;84(9). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02675-17. Print 2018 May 1.
6
Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.饲养场牛的盲肠微生物群,喂食四种芽孢杆菌补充剂。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 1;100(10). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac258.
7
Characterisation of the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts of elk (Cervus canadensis).加拿大马鹿胃肠道细菌群落的特征分析
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2019 Feb;112(2):225-235. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1150-5. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Comparative study of the bacterial communities throughout the gastrointestinal tract in two beef cattle breeds.两个肉牛品种整个胃肠道细菌群落的比较研究。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan;105(1):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-11019-7. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Characterizing the bacterial community across the gastrointestinal tract of goats: Composition and potential function. characterizing the bacterial community across the gastrointestinal tract of goats: Composition and potential function.
Microbiologyopen. 2019 Sep;8(9):e00820. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.820. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
10
Spatial heterogeneity and stability of bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts of broiler chickens.肉鸡胃肠道细菌群落的空间异质性和稳定性。
Poult Sci. 2014 Aug;93(8):1942-50. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03974. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of gastrointestinal and fecal microbial communities as markers of liver abscess risk in beef feedlot cattle.评估胃肠道和粪便微生物群落作为肉牛饲养场牛肝脏脓肿风险标志物的情况。
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf210.
2
Safety and efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03734-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing the link between microbial communities in bovine liver abscesses and the gastrointestinal tract.建立牛肝脏脓肿中的微生物群落与胃肠道之间的联系。
Anim Microbiome. 2023 Nov 20;5(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00278-0.
2
The gut microbiota and its biogeography.肠道微生物组及其生物地理学。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024 Feb;22(2):105-118. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00969-0. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Human microbiome myths and misconceptions.人类微生物组的误区和误解。
Nat Microbiol. 2023 Aug;8(8):1392-1396. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01426-7. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
The gastrointestinal microbiome in dairy cattle is constrained by the deterministic driver of the region and the modified effect of diet.奶牛胃肠道微生物组受区域确定性驱动因素和饮食的修正作用的限制。
Microbiome. 2023 Jan 20;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01453-2.
5
The effect of supplementing CLOSTAT 500 ( PB6) to yearling steers in a commercial feedyard on health, spp. prevalence, feedlot growth performance and carcass characteristics.在商业饲养场向一岁育肥牛补充CLOSTAT 500(PB6)对健康、特定菌种流行率、饲养场生长性能和胴体特性的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 18;6(4):txac131. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac131. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Efficacy of and -Based Feed Additives in Reducing -Associated Health and Performance Effects in Commercial Beef Calves.基于[具体成分]和[具体成分]的饲料添加剂在减轻商品肉牛犊牛与[相关因素]相关的健康和生产性能影响方面的功效。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;11(10):1328. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101328.
7
The Microbial Ecology of Liver Abscesses in Cattle.牛肝脓肿的微生物生态学。
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2022 Nov;38(3):367-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2022.08.004.
8
Dysbiosis and predicted function of dental and ruminal microbiome associated with bovine periodontitis.与牛牙周炎相关的牙齿和瘤胃微生物群失调及预测功能
Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 12;13:936021. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.936021. eCollection 2022.
9
Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.饲养场牛的盲肠微生物群,喂食四种芽孢杆菌补充剂。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 1;100(10). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac258.
10
Liver abscess microbiota of feedlot steers finished in natural and traditional management programs.育肥场牛在自然和传统管理方案下的肝脓肿微生物群。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Nov 1;100(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac252.