Yang Zijing, Alveyn Edward, Russell Mark, Bechman Katie, Coalwood Callum, Price Elizabeth, Abhishek Abhishek, Norton Sam, Galloway James
Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
British Society for Rheumatology, Bride House, London, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3379-3387. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae717.
To update the first-line conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) prescribing pattern, describe change and variation across demographical and geographical factors in the RA population, and identify individual and hospital factors associated with it.
This retrospective cohort study included newly diagnosed RA adult patients from 1 May 2018 to 1 April 2023 in the UK. We used adjusted multinomial logistic regression with random effect to explore associations with different first-line csDMRAD prescription and to account for hospital-level clustering.
We identified 15 462 RA patients who received csDMARD treatment. Overall, 57% received MTX monotherapy and 14% received MTX combination therapy as first-line treatment. MTX is the most frequently medication, following by HCQ and SSZ. Compared with non-MTX prescription, prescription of MTX monotherapy [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.25 95% CI (1.22-1.29)] and MTX combination therapy [aOR 1.45 (1.38-1.52)] was significantly higher in patients with higher DAS28, but lower in the non-White individuals with comorbidities: lung disease, cancer, fracture and heart attack. Among those who received MTX, monotherapy is more likely be prescribed in patients with higher DAS28 [aOR 1.08 (1.05-1.11)] and without lung disease [aOR 0.5 (0.44-0.56)], compared with combination therapy. Around 20% of the variability in first-line csDMARD prescribing was attributed to the hospital level.
In this cohort study of new-onset RA population, both individual- and institution-level variation in first-line csDMARD treatment strategy was evident. Gender, ethnicity, disease activity, and comorbidities, especially lung disease, were associated with disparities at the individual level.
更新一线传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARDs)的处方模式,描述类风湿关节炎(RA)患者人群在人口统计学和地理因素方面的变化及差异,并确定与之相关的个体和医院因素。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年5月1日至2023年4月1日在英国新诊断的成年RA患者。我们使用具有随机效应的调整多项逻辑回归来探讨与不同一线csDMRAD处方的关联,并考虑医院层面的聚类情况。
我们确定了15462例接受csDMARD治疗的RA患者。总体而言,57%的患者接受甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药治疗,14%的患者接受MTX联合治疗作为一线治疗。MTX是最常用的药物,其次是羟氯喹(HCQ)和柳氮磺胺吡啶(SSZ)。与未使用MTX处方相比,疾病活动评分28(DAS28)较高的患者使用MTX单药治疗[调整优势比(aOR)1.25,95%置信区间(CI)(1.22 - 1.29)]和MTX联合治疗[aOR 1.45(1.38 - 1.52)]的比例显著更高,但在患有肺部疾病、癌症、骨折和心脏病发作等合并症的非白人个体中比例较低。在接受MTX治疗的患者中,与联合治疗相比,DAS28较高[aOR 1.08(1.05 - 1.11)]且无肺部疾病[aOR 0.5(0.44 - 0.56)]的患者更有可能接受单药治疗。一线csDMARD处方中约20%的变异性归因于医院层面。
在这项针对新发病RA患者人群的队列研究中,一线csDMARD治疗策略在个体和机构层面均存在明显差异。性别、种族、疾病活动度和合并症,尤其是肺部疾病,在个体层面与差异相关。