Katchamart Wanruchada, Trudeau Judith, Phumethum Veerapong, Bombardier Claire
Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok road, Siriraj hospital, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD008495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008495.
Methotrexate (MTX) is among the most effective disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with less toxicity and better tolerability.
To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of MTX monotherapy compared to MTX combination with non-biologic DMARDs in adult with RA.
Trials were identified in MEDLINE (1950 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), the Cochrane Controlled trials Registry (CENTRAL) (up to 2009), the American and European scientific meeting abstracts 2005-9, the reference lists of all relevant studies, letters, and review articles.
Randomized controlled trials comparing MTX monotherapy versus MTX combined with other non-biologic DMARDs of at least 12 weeks of trial duration in adult RA patients.
Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies,extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias of relevant studies.The efficacy analysis was stratified into 3 groups based on previous DMARDs use: DMARD naive, MTX inadequate response, and non-MTX DMARDs inadequate response. The toxicity analysis was stratified by DMARD combination and pooled across trials for each combination. Our prespecified primary analysis was based on total withdrawal rates for efficacy or toxicity.
A total of 19 trials (2,025 patients) from 6,938 citations were grouped by the type of patients randomised. Trials in DMARD naive patients showed no significant advantage of the MTX combination versus monotherapy; withdrawals for lack of efficacy or toxicity were similar in both groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI.0.70 to 1.93, absolute risk difference(ARD) 5%, 95%CI-3% to 13%). Trials in MTX or non-MTX DMARDs inadequate responder patients also showed no difference in withdrawal rates between the MTX combo versus mono groups with RR 0.86 95% CI 0.49 to1.51, ARD -2 %, 95% CI-13 % to 8 % and RR 0.75 95% CI 0.41 to 1.35, ARD -10%, 95% CI -31% to 11%, respectively. Significant reductions of pain and improvement in physical function (measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire or HAQ) were found in the MTX combination group, but only in MTX-inadequate responders (absolute risk difference -9.72%, 95%CI -14.7% to -4.75% for pain and mean difference (MD) -0.28, 95%CI -0.36 to -0.21 (0-3) for HAQ).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When the balance of efficacy and toxicity is taken into account, the moderate level of evidence from our systematic review showed no statistically significant advantage of the MTX combination versus monotherapy. Trials are needed that compare currently used MTX doses and combination therapies.
甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是类风湿关节炎(RA)中最有效的改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)之一,毒性较小且耐受性较好。
评估MTX单药治疗与MTX联合非生物DMARDs治疗成年RA患者的疗效和毒性。
在MEDLINE(1950年至2009年)、EMBASE(1980年至2009年)、Cochrane对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)(截至2009年)、2005 - 2009年美国和欧洲科学会议摘要、所有相关研究的参考文献列表、信件及综述文章中检索试验。
比较MTX单药治疗与MTX联合其他非生物DMARDs治疗成年RA患者且试验持续时间至少12周的随机对照试验。
两名研究者独立识别符合条件的研究,提取数据并评估相关研究的偏倚风险。疗效分析根据既往DMARDs使用情况分为3组:初治DMARDs患者、MTX反应不足患者和非MTX DMARDs反应不足患者。毒性分析根据DMARDs联合用药情况分层,并在各试验中对每种联合用药进行汇总。我们预先设定的主要分析基于疗效或毒性的总撤药率。
从6938篇文献中筛选出19项试验(2025例患者),并根据随机分组的患者类型进行分组。初治DMARDs患者的试验显示,MTX联合治疗组与单药治疗组相比无显著优势;两组因疗效不佳或毒性而撤药的情况相似(风险比(RR)1.16,95%置信区间0.70至1.93,绝对风险差(ARD)5%,95%置信区间 - 3%至13%)。MTX或非MTX DMARDs反应不足患者的试验也显示,MTX联合治疗组与单药治疗组的撤药率无差异,RR分别为0.86(95%置信区间0.49至1.51,ARD - 2%,95%置信区间 - 13%至8%)和0.75(95%置信区间0.41至1.35,ARD - 10%,95%置信区间 - 31%至11%)。MTX联合治疗组疼痛有显著减轻且身体功能有改善(通过健康评估问卷或HAQ测量),但仅在MTX反应不足患者中出现(疼痛的绝对风险差 - 9.72%,95%置信区间 - 14.7%至 - 4.75%;HAQ的平均差(MD) - 0.28,95%置信区间 - 0.36至 - 0.21(0 - 3))。
综合疗效和毒性的平衡来看,我们系统评价的中等证据水平表明,MTX联合治疗组与单药治疗组相比无统计学显著优势。需要进行比较当前使用的MTX剂量和联合治疗方案的试验。