• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片:关于手术时间、术后疼痛及复发的对比研究

Self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study about surgical time, post-operative pain and recurrence.

作者信息

Aragone Lucía, Pasquini Mariana Toffolo, Croceri Raul, Medina Pablo, Pirchi Daniel

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 1;21(3):292-296. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24. Epub 2024 Dec 24.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24
PMID:39718940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12327777/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), fixation means for meshes (FMMs) are commonly used to reduce hernia recurrence risk. Their use may result in post-operative pain (PP) and may even increase surgical time (ST). Recently, self-gripping meshes (SGMs) have been developed, which leave aside fixation devices; they could potentially reduce PP and even decrease ST. Our primary outcome was to compare ST, PP and recurrence rates in LIHR using SGM versus FMM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comparative retrospective study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent LIHR with transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach from January to December 2022 in a high-volume centre were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of mesh used in surgery (SGM vs. FMM). Demographic variables, hernia type and size, mesh type and size, ST, PP, recurrence and other morbidities were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 411 LIHRs were performed during the period, of which 283 were included in the study. Of these, 234 patients were repaired with FMM and 49 with SGM. ST had a statistically significant reduction in the SGM group ( P = 0.0004) with a mean time of 58.9 min (±13.6), compared to 68.1 min (±18.9) for the FMM group. A trend towards lower PP in the SGM group was noted ( P = 0.08). No recurrences were found in the SGM group with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range: 3).

CONCLUSIONS

SGMs have proven to be a safe, efficient and fast for LIHR in our series. They are a feasible alternative for LIHR, reducing ST and potentially reducing PP. Prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm this trend, along with a longer follow-up period to determine potential advantages in terms of recurrences.

摘要

引言

在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)中,网片固定装置(FMMs)常用于降低疝复发风险。其使用可能导致术后疼痛(PP),甚至可能增加手术时间(ST)。最近,自固定网片(SGMs)已被研发出来,无需使用固定装置;它们有可能减轻PP,甚至缩短ST。我们的主要结果是比较使用SGM与FMM进行LIHR时的ST、PP和复发率。

患者与方法

进行了一项带有前瞻性病例登记的比较性回顾性研究。分析了2022年1月至12月在一个高容量中心接受经腹腹膜前入路LIHR的所有患者。根据手术中使用的网片类型(SGM与FMM)将患者分为两组。比较了两组之间的人口统计学变量、疝的类型和大小、网片类型和大小、ST、PP、复发及其他并发症。

结果

在此期间共进行了411例LIHR,其中283例纳入研究。其中,234例患者使用FMM修复,49例使用SGM修复。SGM组的ST有统计学显著降低(P = 0.0004),平均时间为58.9分钟(±13.6),而FMM组为68.1分钟(±18.9)。注意到SGM组有PP较低的趋势(P = 0.08)。SGM组中位随访18个月(四分位间距:3)未发现复发。

结论

在我们的系列研究中,SGM已被证明对LIHR是安全、有效且快速的。它们是LIHR的一种可行替代方案,可缩短ST并有可能减轻PP。需要进行前瞻性随机试验来证实这一趋势,并进行更长时间的随访以确定在复发方面的潜在优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/f4dc94fc4b7d/JMAS-21-292-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/483b24c7f6da/JMAS-21-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/8b98d96b1e73/JMAS-21-292-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/f4dc94fc4b7d/JMAS-21-292-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/483b24c7f6da/JMAS-21-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/8b98d96b1e73/JMAS-21-292-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1605/12327777/f4dc94fc4b7d/JMAS-21-292-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study about surgical time, post-operative pain and recurrence.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片:关于手术时间、术后疼痛及复发的对比研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 1;21(3):292-296. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_62_24. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
3
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
4
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
5
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
6
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
7
A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair.系统评价随机对照试验评估网片固定在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1093-8. Epub 2013 May 7.
8
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
9
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
10
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery with self-adhesive mesh in 552 patients: a two surgeon experience.552 例应用自黏补片行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的生活质量:两位外科医生的经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2487-2491. doi: 10.1111/ans.17860. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of long-term results.
开放式腹股沟疝修补术中自固定网片与缝合网片的比较:长期结果的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):351-360. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
The HIPPO Trial, a Randomized Double-blind Trial Comparing Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh and Sutured Parietex Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: A Long-term Follow-up Study.HIPPO试验:一项在Lichtenstein疝修补术中比较自固定Parietex Progrip补片与缝合Parietex补片的随机双盲试验——长期随访研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):939-945. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002169.
5
Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result.开放性腹股沟疝修补术中自固定半可吸收补片(PROGRIP)与聚丙烯补片对比的随机试验:6年结果
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
6
Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: A prospective study based on Herniamed Register.自粘补片在经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用:一项基于Herniamed注册库的前瞻性研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):226-34. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181388.
7
Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.开放腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片(Progrip)与缝合补片的Meta分析。
Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.024. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
8
Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months.腹腔镜放置 Parietex ProGrip™ 网片治疗腹股沟疝的低复发率和低慢性疼痛:220 例疝平均随访 23 个月的临床结果。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):313-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1053-3. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison.自固定网片与钉合固定在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的前瞻性比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1798-802. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2683-8. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
10
The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember.欧洲疝学会腹股沟疝分类:简单易记。
Hernia. 2007 Apr;11(2):113-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3. Epub 2007 Mar 13.