Suppr超能文献

添加大环内酯类抗生素用于社区获得性肺炎的医院治疗。

Addition of Macrolide Antibiotics for Hospital Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

作者信息

Wei Jia, Walker A Sarah, Eyre David W

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Medicine.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 15;231(4):e713-e722. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae639.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend combining macrolides with β-lactam antibiotics for moderate-to-high severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however, macrolides pose risks of adverse events and anti-microbial resistance.

METHODS

We analyzed electronic health data from 8872 adults hospitalized with CAP in Oxfordshire, UK (2016-2024), initially treated with amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav. Using inverse probability treatment weighting, we examined the effects of adjunctive macrolides on 30-day all-cause mortality, time to hospital discharge, and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of an association between adjunctive macrolides and 30-day mortality (marginal odds ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.75-1.47] for amoxicillin with vs. without macrolide; 1.12 [0.93-1.34] for co-amoxiclav with vs. without macrolide); and no evidence of a difference in time to discharge (restricted mean days lost +1.76 days [-1.66, +5.19] for amoxicillin, +0.44 days [-1.63, +2.51] for co-amoxiclav). Macrolide use was not associated with SOFA score decreases. Results were consistent across severity sub-groups and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed.

CONCLUSIONS

At a population level, the addition of macrolides was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with CAP. The potential benefits of additional macrolides should be weighed against the risks of adverse effects and anti-microbial resistance.

摘要

背景

指南推荐将大环内酯类药物与β-内酰胺类抗生素联合用于中重度社区获得性肺炎(CAP);然而,大环内酯类药物存在不良事件和抗菌耐药性风险。

方法

我们分析了英国牛津郡8872例因CAP住院的成年人(2016 - 2024年)的电子健康数据,这些患者最初接受阿莫西林或阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗。使用逆概率处理加权法,我们研究了辅助使用大环内酯类药物对30天全因死亡率、出院时间和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分变化的影响。

结果

没有证据表明辅助使用大环内酯类药物与30天死亡率之间存在关联(使用大环内酯类药物的阿莫西林组与未使用大环内酯类药物的阿莫西林组相比,边际优势比为1.05 [95% CI 0.75 - 1.47];使用大环内酯类药物的阿莫西林克拉维酸组与未使用大环内酯类药物的阿莫西林克拉维酸组相比,边际优势比为1.12 [0.93 - 1.34]);也没有证据表明出院时间存在差异(阿莫西林组平均住院天数增加 +1.76天 [-1.66, +5.19],阿莫西林克拉维酸组平均住院天数增加 +0.44天 [-1.63, +2.51])。使用大环内酯类药物与SOFA评分降低无关。在严重程度亚组和对缺失协变量进行插补的敏感性分析中,结果一致。

结论

在总体人群水平上,添加大环内酯类药物与CAP患者临床结局改善无关。应权衡额外使用大环内酯类药物的潜在益处与不良反应和抗菌耐药性风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b5/11998547/92a873bd5a0b/jiae639f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验