Song Chenxi, Qiao Zheng, Cheng Jiaxi, Zhang Yuze, Liu Weida, Yuan Sheng, He Jining, Song Yanjun, Bian Xiaohui, Lin Zhangyu, Fu Rui, Wang Chunyue, Liu Qianqian, Feng Lei, Tao Jin, Dou Kefei
Cardiometabolic Medicine Center, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 7;14(1):e037492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037492. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
The optimal definition and risk stratification approach to identify high-risk patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease has not been well studied to date. The objective of the current study is to compare the prognostic value of different definitions of prediabetes, and to explore the role of "very-high-risk" (VHR) criteria according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guideline in the risk stratification of patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease.
This prospective large-cohort study enrolled a total of 7930 patients with stable coronary heart disease. Prediabetes was defined according to various guidelines and further classified on the basis of the VHR criteria according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guideline. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which was defined as the composite end point of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. During a median of 3 years' follow-up, a total of 256 MACEs occurred. Prediabetes defined according to the World Health Organization/International Expert Committee criteria was associated with significant increased MACE risk compared with normoglycemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.484 [95% CI, 1.139-1.935]; =0.0035). The VHR group was associated with increased MACE risk compared with the non-VHR group (adjusted HR, 1.783 [95% CI, 1.344-2.366], <0.0001). The VHR criteria played an important role in risk stratification, and prediabetes combined with VHR criteria was associated with higher MACE risk regardless of the prediabetes definition.
Our findings suggested the potential use of the World Health Organization/International Expert Committee definition and VHR criteria in risk stratification of patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease.
迄今为止,尚未对识别糖尿病前期合并稳定型冠心病高危患者的最佳定义和风险分层方法进行充分研究。本研究的目的是比较糖尿病前期不同定义的预后价值,并根据2018年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会胆固醇指南探讨“极高危”(VHR)标准在糖尿病前期合并稳定型冠心病患者风险分层中的作用。
这项前瞻性大队列研究共纳入7930例稳定型冠心病患者。根据不同指南定义糖尿病前期,并根据2018年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会指南的VHR标准进一步分类。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为心源性死亡、非致命性急性心肌梗死和卒中的复合终点。在中位3年的随访期间,共发生256例MACE。与血糖正常者相比,根据世界卫生组织/国际专家委员会标准定义的糖尿病前期与MACE风险显著增加相关(校正风险比[HR],1.484[95%CI,1.139 - 1.935];P = 0.0035)。与非VHR组相比,VHR组与MACE风险增加相关(校正HR,1.783[95%CI,1.344 - 2.366],P < 0.0001)。VHR标准在风险分层中起重要作用,无论糖尿病前期的定义如何,糖尿病前期合并VHR标准与更高的MACE风险相关。
我们的研究结果提示,世界卫生组织/国际专家委员会定义和VHR标准在糖尿病前期合并稳定型冠心病患者的风险分层中具有潜在应用价值。