Asif Kaiz S, Mitra Arun, Ortega-Gutierrez Santiago, Herial Nabeel, Desai Shashvat, Jadhav Ashutosh, Al-Mufti Fawaz, Roy Adrija, Singh Romil, Brown Grant, Sarraj Amrou, Jose Arun, Alurkar Anand, Karapurkar A P, Sharma Arvind, Gupta Vipul, Goel Gaurav, Khurana Dheeraj, Das Biplab, Roy Jayanta, Das Deep, Kumar Rahul, Kuruttukulam Gigy, Kumar Vg Pradeep, Srivastava Mv Padma, Pandian Jeyaraj, Huded Vikram, Yavagal Dileep, Soman Biju, Sylaja P N
Stroke and Neuro-Endovascular Surgery, Ascension Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
Int J Stroke. 2025 Jul;20(6):708-720. doi: 10.1177/17474930241312598. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
Stroke is a leading cause of global mortality and disability, with a disproportionately high burden in low- and middle-income countries. Access to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) remains extremely limited.
We evaluated the spatial distribution and geographic accessibility of stroke centers in India.
Data on IVT capable (IVT-C) and EVT capable (EVT-C) stroke centers were collected in March 2021 from thrombectomy devices and pharmaceutical industry providers, respectively. Data were collated and geocoded to compare and calculate zonal statistics and state/union territory (UT) summaries using descriptive statistics. Data on population centers were obtained from the Survey of India website. For estimating driving times, we used the Google Distance Matrix API to find the driving distance between each population center and its nearest stroke facility. Subsequently, population coverages were estimated as a proportion of the population having access to stroke centers for each time interval and based on the population projection for the year 2020 and compared across states.
A total of 566 IVT-C stroke centers were spread across 26 states and UTs, of which 361 (63%) were EVT-C. Ten UTs lacked stroke centers. The average stroke centers per million (SCPM) population was 0.41 and 0.26 for IVT-C and EVT-C, respectively. Median distances to the nearest IVT-C and EVT-C centers were 115 km (interquartile range (IQR): 66-175) and 131 km (IQR: 79-198), respectively. Access within 1 h to an IVT-C and an EVT-C center was available to 26.3% and 20.6% of the Indian population, respectively.
Access to stroke care in India is poor, with critical regional disparities as reflected by the low SCPM population, long driving times, and a small population with access within the golden hour. There is an urgent need to establish IVT-C and EVT-C stroke centers in the existing poorly served regions of India to increase access and improve outcomes for stroke patients.
中风是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因,在低收入和中等收入国家负担尤其沉重。静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内治疗(EVT)的可及性仍然极为有限。
我们评估了印度中风中心的空间分布和地理可及性。
2021年3月分别从取栓设备和制药行业供应商处收集了具备IVT能力(IVT-C)和具备EVT能力(EVT-C)的中风中心的数据。对数据进行整理和地理编码,以使用描述性统计方法比较和计算区域统计数据以及邦/联邦属地(UT)汇总数据。人口中心的数据来自印度测量局网站。为了估算驾车时间,我们使用谷歌距离矩阵应用程序编程接口来查找每个人口中心与其最近的中风治疗机构之间的驾车距离。随后,根据每个时间间隔内能够使用中风中心的人口比例,并基于2020年的人口预测来估算人口覆盖率,并在各邦之间进行比较。
共有566个IVT-C中风中心分布在26个邦和UT,其中361个(63%)为EVT-C。10个UT没有中风中心。IVT-C和EVT-C每百万人口的中风中心平均数量分别为0.41和0.26。到最近的IVT-C和EVT-C中心的中位距离分别为115公里(四分位间距(IQR):66 - 175)和131公里(IQR:79 - 198)。分别有26.3%和20.6%的印度人口能够在1小时内到达IVT-C和EVT-C中心。
印度中风护理的可及性较差,每百万人口中风中心数量低、驾车时间长以及在黄金时间内能够获得治疗的人口较少,这些都反映出严重的地区差异。迫切需要在印度现有服务欠佳的地区建立IVT-C和EVT-C中风中心,以增加可及性并改善中风患者的治疗效果。