Suppr超能文献

复杂性憩室炎手术治疗的差异:欧洲外科医生的横断面研究

Variation in the surgical management of complicated diverticulitis: a cross-sectional study of European surgeons.

作者信息

Huo Bright, Massey Lisa H, Seitidis Georgios, Mavridis Dimitris, Antoniou Stavros A

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Guidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):691-698. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11456-9. Epub 2024 Dec 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are many options for the surgical management of complicated diverticulitis, and standards vary widely despite international practice recommendations. We conducted a survey to capture the variation in practice across Europe.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was distributed to fellow and surgeon members of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) via email using the Opinio survey platform. Participants shared their demographic details. We asked members to rank the most likely intervention for patients with both stable and unstable Hinchey Class III, as well as Hinchey Class IV diverticulitis based on practice standards in their country. We used descriptive statistics, including counts and percentages, to characterize survey results. We created a heatmap to visualize the percentage of votes received for each intervention.

RESULTS

We received 233 responses from surgeons and fellows across Europe from various countries, including Italy (35.6%), Greece (11.2%), and the United Kingdom (9.9%). Most members (79.4%) self-reported having expertise in colorectal surgery. For patients with stable Hinchey III diverticulitis, surgeons offered Hartmann's resection (HR) (41.6%), primary resection and anastomosis (PRA) (18.5%), laparoscopic peritonea lavage (LPL) prior to HR (16.9%), or LPL prior to PRA (15.5%), or LPL only (8.6%). In total, 31.4% of respondents offered LPL prior to sigmoid resection (HR + PRA). For patients with unstable Hinchey III diverticulitis, respondents offered HR (73.9%), PRA (3.85%), LPL only (6.84%), or LPL followed by sigmoid resection (15.4%). For patients with stable Hinchey IV diverticulitis, surgeons offered HR (71.7%), PRA (4.7%), LPL only (1.3%), or LPL then sigmoid resection (22.3%). Finally, for patients with unstable Hinchey IV diverticulitis, surgeons offered HR (83.1%), PRA (1.3%), LPL only (3.5%), or LPL followed by sigmoid resection (12.1%).

CONCLUSION

Significant variation exists in the surgical management of complicated diverticulitis across Europe. Efforts must be made to increase the awareness and uptake of surgical guideline recommendations in clinical practice.

摘要

引言

复杂憩室炎的手术治疗有多种选择,尽管有国际实践建议,但标准差异很大。我们进行了一项调查,以了解欧洲各地的实践差异。

方法

通过Opinio调查平台,通过电子邮件向欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)的会员和外科医生分发了一份在线问卷。参与者分享了他们的人口统计学细节。我们要求会员根据本国的实践标准,对Hinchey III级稳定和不稳定以及Hinchey IV级憩室炎患者最可能的干预措施进行排名。我们使用描述性统计,包括计数和百分比,来描述调查结果。我们创建了一个热图,以直观显示每种干预措施获得的投票百分比。

结果

我们收到了来自欧洲各国的外科医生和会员的233份回复,包括意大利(35.6%)、希腊(11.2%)和英国(9.9%)。大多数成员(79.4%)自我报告在结直肠手术方面有专业知识。对于Hinchey III级稳定憩室炎患者,外科医生提供Hartmann切除术(HR)(41.6%)、一期切除吻合术(PRA)(18.5%)、HR术前腹腔镜腹膜灌洗(LPL)(16.9%)或PRA术前LPL(15.5%),或仅LPL(8.6%)。总共有31.4%的受访者在乙状结肠切除术前提供LPL(HR + PRA)。对于Hinchey III级不稳定憩室炎患者,受访者提供HR(73.9%)、PRA(3.85%)、仅LPL(6.84%)或LPL后行乙状结肠切除术(15.4%)。对于Hinchey IV级稳定憩室炎患者,外科医生提供HR(71.7%)、PRA(4.7%)、仅LPL(1.3%)或LPL后行乙状结肠切除术(22.3%)。最后,对于Hinchey IV级不稳定憩室炎患者,外科医生提供HR(83.1%)、PRA(1.3%)、仅LPL(3.5%)或LPL后行乙状结肠切除术(12.1%)。

结论

欧洲复杂憩室炎的手术治疗存在显著差异。必须努力提高临床实践中对手术指南建议的认识和采用率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验