Suppr超能文献

复杂性憩室炎的外科治疗:系统评价与个体患者数据网络荟萃分析:一项欧洲内镜外科学会/欧洲临床营养与代谢学会合作项目

Surgical management of complicated diverticulitis: systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis : An EAES/ESCP collaborative project.

作者信息

Huo Bright, Ortenzi Monica, Anteby Roi, Tryliskyy Yegor, Carrano Francesco Maria, Seitidis Georgios, Mavridis Dimitris, Hoek Vincent T, Serventi Alberto, Bemelman Willem A, Binda Gian Andrea, Duran Rafael, Doulias Triantafyllos, Forbes Nauzer, Francis Nader K, Grass Fabian, Jensen Jesper, Krogsgaard Marianne, Massey Lisa H, Morelli Luca, Oberkofler Christian E, Popa Dorin E, Schultz Johannes Kurt, Sultan Shahnaz, Tuech Jean-Jacques, Bonjer Hendrik Jaap, Antoniou Stavros A

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):699-715. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11457-8. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of individualized patient data (IPD) to inform the development of evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central in October 2023 to identify RCTs comparing Hartmann's resection (HR), primary resection and anastomosis (PRA), or laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) among patients with class Ib-IV Hinchey diverticulitis. Outcomes of interest were prioritized by an international, multidisciplinary panel including two patient partners. Article screening, data extraction for IPD, and risk of bias appraisal were performed by two reviewers. We used a random-effects NMA to synthesize direct and indirect evidence. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I statistic. The panel appraised the certainty of the evidence using GRADE and CINeMA.

RESULTS

Fourteen reports of seven RCTs were derived from 4,659 articles. IPD data were available for 595/678 patients (88.8%) across trials. Patients had a mean age ± SD of 64.61 ± 13.64 years and a mean BMI ± SD of 26.12 ± 5.20 kg/m, representing Hinchey classes I (1.2%), II (1.0%) III (76.3%), and IV (12.1%), respectively. Using minimal important difference thresholds, in-hospital/30-day mortality was higher among patients receiving LPL versus HR [42 more per 1000, 95% CI (41 fewer to 331 more), moderate effect; low certainty] as well as PRA [45 more per 1000 patients, 95% CI (33 fewer to 340 more) moderate effect; low certainty] without heterogeneity (I = 0%). Among 417 patients from four trials, there was a lower stoma rate among patients receiving PRA versus LPL [539 fewer per 1000, 95% CI (647 fewer to 306 fewer), large effect; low certainty].

CONCLUSION

PRA likely confers a lower stoma rate at 1 year compared to HR, while there may be no difference in 30-day/in-hospital mortality. LPL likely confers a higher in-hospital/30-day mortality rate compared to HR and PRA.

摘要

背景

我们对个体患者数据(IPD)进行了系统评价和网状荟萃分析(NMA),以为循证临床实践建议的制定提供依据。

方法

我们于2023年10月检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Central,以确定比较Ib-IV级欣奇憩室炎患者行哈特曼切除术(HR)、一期切除吻合术(PRA)或腹腔镜腹腔灌洗术(LPL)的随机对照试验(RCT)。一个包括两名患者代表的国际多学科小组确定了感兴趣的结局并进行了优先级排序。由两名审阅者进行文章筛选、IPD数据提取和偏倚风险评估。我们使用随机效应NMA来综合直接和间接证据。使用I统计量评估异质性。该小组使用GRADE和CINeMA评估证据的确定性。

结果

从4659篇文章中获得了7项RCT的14份报告。各试验中共有595/678例患者(88.8%)有IPD数据。患者的平均年龄±标准差为64.61±13.64岁,平均体重指数±标准差为26.12±5.20kg/m²,分别代表欣奇I级(1.2%)、II级(1.0%)、III级(76.3%)和IV级(12.1%)。采用最小重要差异阈值,接受LPL的患者院内/30天死亡率高于接受HR的患者[每1000例多42例,95%CI(少41例至多331例),中度效应;低确定性]以及接受PRA的患者[每1000例患者多45例,95%CI(少33例至多340例),中度效应;低确定性],且无异质性(I=0%)。在四项试验的417例患者中,接受PRA的患者造口率低于接受LPL的患者[每1000例少539例,95%CI(少647例至少306例),大效应;低确定性]。

结论

与HR相比,PRA在1年时可能使造口率更低,而在30天/院内死亡率方面可能无差异。与HR和PRA相比,LPL可能使院内/30天死亡率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验