Bogo Gherardo, Porrini Martín P, Aguilar-Monge Ingrid, Aldea-Sánchez Patricia, de Groot Grecia S, Velarde Rodrigo A, Xolalpa-Aroche Aurora, Vázquez Diego E
Sociedad Latinoamericana de Investigación en Abejas (SoLatInA), Montevideo, Uruguay; CREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy.
Sociedad Latinoamericana de Investigación en Abejas (SoLatInA), Montevideo, Uruguay; Centro de Investigación en Abejas Sociales (CIAS)-Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM CONICET-UNMdP), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata-CONICET, Centro de Asociación Simple CIC PBA, Estación Costera J.J. Nágera, Ruta Provincial 11 Km 5395 Playa Chapadmalal, 7603 Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jan 10;959:178229. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178229. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Stingless bees (tribe Meliponini), comprising over 600 known species within the largest group of eusocial bees, play a critical role in ecosystem functioning through their pollination services. They contribute to the reproduction of numerous plant species, including many economically important crops such as cacao, coffee, and various fruits. Beyond their ecological significance, stingless bees hold cultural and economic importance for many native and rural communities, where they are managed for their honey, pollen, and propolis for nutritional and health purposes. The overwhelming majority of studies on pesticide toxicity and risk assessment on bees are conducted on the model species Apis mellifera in the United States and Europe, where stingless bees are absent. In May 2023, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its revised guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products (PPPs) for bees, including, beyond honey bees, other bee species from Bombus and Osmia genera. Despite the Meliponini widespread distribution in tropical and subtropical regions, the impact of pesticides on stingless bees remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a systematic review of stingless bee toxicological studies which highlights a substantial knowledge gap. Up to October of 2024, only 144 research articles on the effects of pesticides on Meliponini had been identified, 80 % of those were conducted in a single country (Brazil). The number of bee species and PPPs tested is extremely low, with just five species accounting for almost 50 % of the collected data and only 79 PPPs tested, among which biopesticides were the most common. Concerning the experimental methodologies, there is a significant lack of studies focusing on chronic exposure and field assays, as well as a scarcity of studies focusing on sublethal effects. Furthermore, we pinpoint to areas where research is needed for the development of risk assessment guidelines to protect these vital pollinators.
无刺蜂(Meliponini族)是群居性蜜蜂中最大的群体,包含600多种已知物种,它们通过授粉服务在生态系统功能中发挥着关键作用。它们有助于众多植物物种的繁殖,包括许多具有重要经济价值的作物,如可可、咖啡和各种水果。除了具有生态意义外,无刺蜂对许多当地和农村社区具有文化和经济重要性,在这些社区中,人们为了获取蜂蜜、花粉和蜂胶用于营养和健康目的而对它们进行管理。关于农药对蜜蜂毒性和风险评估的绝大多数研究是在美国和欧洲以模式物种意大利蜜蜂进行的,而这些地区没有无刺蜂。2023年5月,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)发布了其关于植物保护产品(PPPs)对蜜蜂风险评估的修订指导文件,其中除了蜜蜂外,还包括来自熊蜂属和壁蜂属的其他蜜蜂物种。尽管无刺蜂在热带和亚热带地区广泛分布,但农药对无刺蜂的影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在这里,我们对无刺蜂毒理学研究进行了系统综述,突出了一个巨大的知识空白。截至2024年10月,仅确定了144篇关于农药对Meliponini族影响的研究文章,其中80%是在一个国家(巴西)进行的。所测试的蜜蜂物种和植物保护产品数量极低,仅5个物种占收集数据的近50%,仅测试了79种植物保护产品,其中生物农药最为常见。关于实验方法,严重缺乏关注慢性暴露和田间试验的研究,以及关注亚致死效应的研究也很少。此外,我们指出了为制定保护这些重要传粉者的风险评估指南而需要开展研究的领域。