Suppr超能文献

犬在不同高度的障碍训练中行走的运动学和动力学

Kinematics and kinetics of dogs walking over increasing heights of cavaletti exercise.

作者信息

Clarke Katie, Terry Jade, Blake Scott, Ferro de Godoy Roberta

机构信息

Anglia Ruskin University, Writtle School of Agriculture, Animal and Environmental Sciences, Lordship Road, Chelmsford, CM1 3RR, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Dec 4;10(24):e40952. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40952. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of four heights of cavaletti exercise on canine kinematics and kinetics. Eight dogs had kinematics and kinetics data collected whilst completing cavaletti pole exercises at four different heights (floor, mid-metatarsal, hock, and stifle). Dogs had anatomical markers placed on bony landmarks of the fore and hindlimb joints. Each trial was recorded via a high-speed camera and two pressure mats. Kinematics outcomes were joint range of motion (ROM). Kinetic outcomes were force (%BW), impulse and peak pressure. Friedman and Wilcoxon's tests were performed to identify significant differences between cavaletti heights. A statistically significant increase was found at hock height placement across all joints whilst maintaining kinetic parameters similar to floor height. No significant differences were found for hip range of motion at any pole height. It was found that stifle height showed no increase in joint range of motion but has the highest forces involved. This determines that hock height is the most beneficial height for improving joint range of motion whilst not increasing forces upon the limbs. Stifle height should be avoided, in some conditions, due to high peak pressures, which do not necessarily lead to a significant further increase in range of motion.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定四种高度的马镫运动对犬类运动学和动力学的影响。八只狗在完成四种不同高度(地面、跖骨中部、跗关节和膝关节)的马镫杆运动时收集了运动学和动力学数据。在狗的前肢和后肢关节的骨性标志上放置了解剖标记。每次试验通过高速摄像机和两个压力垫进行记录。运动学结果是关节活动范围(ROM)。动力学结果是力(%体重)、冲量和峰值压力。进行了弗里德曼检验和威尔科克森检验,以确定马镫高度之间的显著差异。发现在跗关节高度放置时,所有关节的活动范围均有统计学显著增加,同时保持与地面高度相似的动力学参数。在任何杆高度下,髋关节活动范围均未发现显著差异。发现膝关节高度时关节活动范围没有增加,但涉及的力最大。这表明跗关节高度是改善关节活动范围同时又不增加肢体受力的最有益高度。在某些情况下,由于峰值压力较高,应避免使用膝关节高度,因为这不一定会导致活动范围进一步显著增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae4/11665453/a204bfc53c5e/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验