• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统与终末期肝病模型之间的相关性。

The correlation between the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease in patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

作者信息

Ludusanu Andreea, Ciuntu Bogdan-Mihnea, Tanevski Adelina, Bernic Valentin, Tinica Grigore

机构信息

Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences I, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2024 Oct;17(10):926-933. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0311.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2024-0311
PMID:39720173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11665745/
Abstract

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is a widely used tool for quantifying hepatic dysfunction, providing greater accuracy and a wider range of values compared to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, being also used in prioritizing patients who are eligible for liver transplantation. This study assessed the correlation between the MELD score and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), a reliable system for categorizing risk levels in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. This retrospective study analyzed data from 589 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu' in Iași between January 2011 and December 2020. Data collected included demographical, clinical, biochemical, and intraoperative parameters. The average MELD score was 6.09 ± 4.1 (median = 5.72), and the average EuroSCORE II was 6.28 ± 8 (median = 3.85). A significant but relatively modest positive relationship was found between the MELD score and EuroSCORE II, with a correlation coefficient of 0.23 and a corresponding significance level of 0.001. This study demonstrates a positive correlation between MELD and EuroSCORE II in patients who underwent CABG. Incorporating the MELD score into the preoperative risk assessment of cardiac surgery patients could help identify high-risk individuals and guide clinical decision-making.

摘要

终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分是一种广泛用于量化肝功能障碍的工具,与Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分相比,它具有更高的准确性和更广泛的值范围,也用于对符合肝移植条件的患者进行优先级排序。本研究评估了MELD评分与欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)之间的相关性,EuroSCORE II是一种用于对心血管手术患者的风险水平进行分类的可靠系统。这项回顾性研究分析了2011年1月至2020年12月期间在雅西的“Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu”心血管疾病研究所接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的589例患者的数据。收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床、生化和术中参数。平均MELD评分为6.09±4.1(中位数=5.72),平均EuroSCORE II为6.28±8(中位数=3.85)。在MELD评分与EuroSCORE II之间发现了显著但相对适度的正相关关系,相关系数为0.23,相应的显著性水平为0.001。本研究表明,在接受CABG的患者中,MELD与EuroSCORE II之间存在正相关。将MELD评分纳入心脏手术患者的术前风险评估中,有助于识别高危个体并指导临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbb/11665745/c67c68bcc253/JMedLife-17-926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbb/11665745/a86a5eecc627/JMedLife-17-926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbb/11665745/c67c68bcc253/JMedLife-17-926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbb/11665745/a86a5eecc627/JMedLife-17-926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbb/11665745/c67c68bcc253/JMedLife-17-926-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The correlation between the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease in patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统与终末期肝病模型之间的相关性。
J Med Life. 2024 Oct;17(10):926-933. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0311.
2
Liver Status Assessment After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后的肝脏状态评估
Cureus. 2024 Oct 23;16(10):e72210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72210. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Impact of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score for mortality in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.模型终末期肝病评分(MELD)对接受冠状动脉旁路手术患者死亡率的影响。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(2):125-131. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_019.
4
European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Liver Dysfunction.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II与肝功能障碍
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 10;13(1):154. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010154.
5
Off-Pump Reduces Risk of Coronary Bypass Grafting in Patients with High MELD-XI Score.非体外循环可降低高MELD-XI评分患者冠状动脉搭桥术的风险。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;73(3):191-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786039. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Cardiac surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: risk factors for predicting mortality.肝硬化患者的心脏手术:预测死亡率的危险因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 21;20(35):12608-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12608.
7
Concomitant cardiac surgery and liver transplantation: an alternative approach in patients with end stage liver failure?同期心脏手术与肝移植:终末期肝衰竭患者的一种替代治疗方法?
Perfusion. 2021 Oct;36(7):737-744. doi: 10.1177/0267659120966549. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
8
Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis (CASTER) Study: Early and Long-Term Outcomes.肝硬化患者心脏手术(CASTER)研究:早期和长期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr;111(4):1242-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.110. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
EuroSCORE II with SYNTAX score to assess risks of coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.采用欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和SYNTAX评分来评估冠状动脉旁路移植术的预后风险。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu045. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
A Novel Risk Stratification System for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery with Impaired Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.一种用于预测左心室射血分数降低的冠状动脉旁路移植术后院内死亡率的新型风险分层系统。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Aug 28;23(5):E621-E626. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3089.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-year mortality, readmission, and medical expenses in critical care survivors: A population-based cohort study.重症监护幸存者的三年死亡率、再入院率和医疗费用:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2024 Mar;37(2):251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.036. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
Cardiovascular Assessment up to One Year After COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis.新冠疫苗相关心肌炎后长达一年的心血管评估
Circulation. 2023 Aug;148(5):436-439. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064772. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
MELD-score for risk stratification in cardiac surgery.
MELD 评分用于心脏手术中的风险分层。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Sep;38(9):1156-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02262-9. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
Assessing the risk of surgery in patients with cirrhosis.评估肝硬化患者的手术风险。
Hepatol Commun. 2023 Mar 30;7(4). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000086. eCollection 2023 Apr 1.
5
Perceptions and Expectations of Academic Staff in Bucharest towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Dental Education.布加勒斯特高校教职人员对新冠疫情对牙科教育影响的认知和期望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031782.
6
Worldwide prevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus among patients with cirrhosis at country, region, and global levels: a systematic review.全球各国、各地区及全球范围内肝硬化患者中乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒的流行情况:系统评价。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;7(8):724-735. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00050-4. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Factors that Affect the Surveillance and Late-Stage Detection of a Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma.影响新诊断肝细胞癌监测和晚期检测的因素。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):3293-3298. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3293.
8
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predicts the Mortality of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.终末期肝病模型评分可预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者的死亡率。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2021 Apr 17;2021:6401092. doi: 10.1155/2021/6401092. eCollection 2021.
9
Spectral Decomposition of the Flow and Characterization of the Sound Signals through Stenoses with Different Levels of Severity.血流的频谱分解及不同严重程度狭窄处声音信号的特征分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Mar 19;8(3):41. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8030041.
10
Post-Intensive Care Unit Care. A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Priorities and Implications for Redesign.重症监护病房后护理。患者优先事项的定性分析及其对重新设计的意义。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Feb;17(2):221-228. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-332OC.